World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10683 10003 5580 5095 88 3111

Han-Joo Lee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Han-Joo Lee between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Han-Joo Lee published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2013. 8 of the 100 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2013. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
2003 2025

100 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Han-Joo Lee: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 0
2005 6
2006 0
2007 3
2008 2
2009 1
2010 3
2011 3
2012 5
2013 12
2014 5
2015 7
2016 4
2017 6
2018 5
2019 3
2020 8
2021 9
2022 4
2023 4
2024 5
2025 3
Total 100
Download as CSV

Han-Joo Lee publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Han-Joo Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 88
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Han-Joo Lee D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Han-Joo Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Han-Joo Lee is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in the United States. Their primary research areas span Psychology and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology as subfields. Additionally, their work touches on Psychiatry and Mental Health as well as Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's research topics cover a variety of psychological and behavioral domains. Key areas include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. They also have produced work related to Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, and Behavioral Health and Interventions.

Han-Joo Lee has contributed to several notable publication venues. Frequent journals for their work include the Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Cognitive Therapy and Research, NeuroRegulation, and Journal of Addictions Nursing.

Several papers highlight the range of Lee's research contributions. These include:

  • Body-focused repetitive behaviors and non-suicidal self-injury: A comparison of clinical characteristics and symptom features, 2020, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • State anxiety reduces working memory capacity but does not impact filtering cost for neutral distracters, 2020, Psychophysiology
  • Effects of computerized cognitive training for children with dyslexia: An ERP study, 2020, Journal of Neurolinguistics
  • Hippocampal volume and volume asymmetry prospectively predict PTSD symptom emergence among Iraq-deployed soldiers, 2021, Psychological Medicine
  • Association between spatial working memory and Re-experiencing symptoms in PTSD, 2021, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Throughout their career, they have frequently collaborated with other researchers. Key coauthors include Abel S. Mathew, Salahadin Lotfi, Ívar Snorrason, Christine L. Larson, and Richard T. Ward.

Best Publications

  • Two different types of obsession: autogenous obsessions and reactive obsessions.

    H.-J Lee;S.-M Kwon

  • Quantifying the impact of recent negative life events on suicide attempts.

    Courtney L. Bagge;Catherine Rose Glenn;Han-Joo Lee

  • Mechanisms of change in ERP treatment of compulsive hand washing: does primary threat make a difference?

    Jesse R. Cougle;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Han-Joo Lee;Michael J. Telch

  • Association of predeployment gaze bias for emotion stimuli with later symptoms of PTSD and depression in soldiers deployed in Iraq.

    Christopher G. Beevers;Han Joo Lee;Han Joo Lee;Tony T. Wells;Tony T. Wells;Alissa J. Ellis;Alissa J. Ellis

  • Alcohol as an acute risk factor for recent suicide attempts: a case-crossover analysis.

    Courtney L. Bagge;Han-Joo Lee;Julie A. Schumacher;Kim L. Gratz

  • Testing the autogenous–reactive model of obsessions

    Han-Joo Lee;Seok-Man Kwon;Jun Soo Kwon;Michael J. Telch

  • Near-term predictors of the intensity of suicidal ideation: an examination of the 24 h prior to a recent suicide attempt.

    Courtney L. Bagge;Andrew K. Littlefield;Kenneth R. Conner;Julie A. Schumacher

  • Autogenous/reactive obsessions and their relationship with OCD symptoms and schizotypal personality features.

    Han-Joo Lee;Michael J. Telch

  • Negative Reinforcement and Premonitory Urges in Youth With Tourette Syndrome An Experimental Evaluation

    Matthew R. Capriotti;Bryan C. Brandt;Jennifer E. Turkel;Han-Joo Lee

  • Thought–action fusion and its relationship to schizotypy and OCD symptoms

    Han-Joo Lee;Jesse R. Cougle;Michael J. Telch

  • Studies on self-esteem of penile size in young Korean military men.

    Hwancheol Son;Hanjoo Lee;Jung-Sik Huh;Soo Woong Kim

  • Are responsibility beliefs inflated in non-checking OCD patients?

    Jesse R. Cougle;Han-Joo Lee;Paul M. Salkovskis

  • Attentional biases in social anxiety: An investigation using the inattentional blindness paradigm

    Han Joo Lee;Michael J. Telch

  • Associations between serotonin transporter gene promoter region (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism and gaze bias for emotional information.

    Christopher G. Beevers;C. Nathan Marti;Han Joo Lee;Deborah L. Stote

  • A comparison of autogenous/reactive obsessions and worry in a nonclinical population: a test of the continuum hypothesis.

    Han Joo Lee;Soon Hee Lee;Hyang Suk Kim;Seok Man Kwon

  • Patterns and predictors of tic suppressibility in youth with Tic disorders

    Christine A. Conelea;Brianna Wellen;Douglas W. Woods;Deanna J. Greene

  • An exploration of the relationship between mental pollution and OCD symptoms.

    Jesse R. Cougle;Han-Joo Lee;Jonathan D. Horowitz;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor

  • The functional value of preventive and restorative safety behaviors: a systematic review of the literature

    Amy R. Goetz;Taylor P. Davine;Stephan G. Siwiec;Han-Joo Lee

  • A multi-method examination of the role of incompleteness in compulsive checking.

    Jesse R. Cougle;Kristin E. Fitch;Samantha Jacobson;Han-Joo Lee

  • Emotional Reactivity to a Single Inhalation of 35% Carbon Dioxide and Its Association With Later Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Anxiety in Soldiers Deployed to Iraq

    Michael J. Telch;David Rosenfield;Han Joo Lee;Anushka V Pai

  • Differential performance on the go/no-go task as a function of the autogenous-reactive taxonomy of obsessions: findings from a non-treatment seeking sample.

    Han-Joo Lee;Brittanie P. Yost;Michael J. Telch

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Telch
Michael J. Telch The University of Texas at Austin
Douglas W. Woods
Douglas W. Woods Marquette University
Jesse R. Cougle
Jesse R. Cougle Florida State University
Ahmad R. Hariri
Ahmad R. Hariri Duke University
Christine L. Larson
Christine L. Larson University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Matthew R. Capriotti
Matthew R. Capriotti San Jose State University
Courtney L. Bagge
Courtney L. Bagge University of Michigan Medical School
Christopher G. Beevers
Christopher G. Beevers The University of Texas at Austin
Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor
Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor University of California, Los Angeles
Robert E. Ferrell
Robert E. Ferrell University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open doors to various career opportunities, especially in the growing field of mental health. Many universities now offer flexible online programs that allow you to earn your degree while balancing personal commitments. Online degrees are ideal for those seeking to enter professions like licensed counseling, clinical therapy, or school counseling.

Career pathways for psychology graduates are diverse. Becoming a licensed therapist, for example, requires specific education and certification depending on the state. Steps often include earning a relevant master's degree, completing supervised clinical experience, and passing state-issued exams. You can learn about becoming a licensed therapist in Bakersfield, becoming a licensed therapist in Baltimore, and becoming a licensed therapist in Boise for state-specific guidance and requirements.

Certification and licensure requirements can vary widely, so it's essential to research the rules in your area. For instance, the Boston licensed therapist education requirements differ from those in other cities. If you’re passionate about helping others and committed to ongoing learning, an online psychology degree is a great starting point for a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Han-Joo Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles