World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Amparo Belloch

Amparo Belloch

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
3495
World Ranking
10995
National Ranking
139

Amparo Belloch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amparo Belloch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Amparo Belloch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amparo Belloch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Comorbidity, age of onset and suicidality in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD): An international collaboration☆☆☆

    V. Brakoulias;V. Starcevic;A. Belloch;C. Brown

  • Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents

    Adam S. Radomsky;Gillian M. Alcolado;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Pino Alonso

  • To seek advice or not to seek advice about the problem: the help-seeking dilemma for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Amparo Belloch;Gema del Valle;Carmen Morillo;Carmen Carrió

  • Clinical obsessions in obsessive-compulsive patients and obsession-relevant intrusive thoughts in non-clinical, depressed and anxious subjects: where are the differences?

    Carmen Morillo;Amparo Belloch;Gemma García-Soriano

  • Intrusive Thoughts in Non-Clinical Subjects: The Role of Frequency and Unpleasantness on Appraisal Ratings and Control Strategies.

    Amparo Belloch;Carmen Morillo;Mariela Lucero;Elena Cabedo

  • Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: from normal cognitive intrusions to clinical obsessions.

    Gemma García-Soriano;Amparo Belloch;Carmen Morillo;David A. Clark

  • Dysfunctional belief domains related to obsessive-compulsive disorder: a further examination of their dimensionality and specificity.

    Amparo Belloch;Carmen Morillo;Juan V. Luciano;Gemma García-Soriano

  • Confirmatory factor analysis of the White Bear Suppression Inventory and the Thought Control Questionnaire: A comparison of alternative models.

    Juan V. Luciano;Amparo Belloch;Salvador Algarabel;José M. Tomás

  • Gender differences in health-related quality of life among patients with asthma.

    Amparo Belloch;Miguel Perpiñá;Eva Martínez-Moragón;Alfredo de Diego

  • La evaluación del perfeccionismo: utilidad de la Escala Multidimensional de Perfeccionismo en población española

    Ángel Carrasco;Amparo Belloch;Conxa Perpiñá

  • The HEXACO–100 Across 16 Languages: A Large-Scale Test of Measurement Invariance

    Isabel Thielmann;Nazar Akrami;Toni Babarović;Amparo Belloch

  • Effects of suppressing neutral and obsession-like thoughts in normal subjects: beyond frequency

    Amparo Belloch;Carmen Morillo;Amparo Giménez

  • Determinants of dyspnea in patients with different grades of stable asthma.

    Eva Martínez-Moragón;Miguel Perpiñá;Amparo Belloch;Alfredo de Diego

  • Calidad de vida en el asma: validación del cuestionario AQLQ para su utilización en población española

    M. Perpiñá;A. de Diego;L. Compte;A. Belloch

  • Incompleteness and not just right experiences in the explanation of Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

    Amparo Belloch;Gertrudis Fornés;Angel Carrasco;Clara López-Solá

  • Intrusive Thoughts in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder and Eating Disorder Patients: A Differential Analysis

    Gemma García-Soriano;Maria Roncero;Conxa Perpiñá;Conxa Perpiñá;Amparo Belloch

  • Can Brief, Daily Training Using a Mobile App Help Change Maladaptive Beliefs? Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

    María Roncero;Amparo Belloch;Guy Doron

  • A novel approach to challenging OCD related beliefs using a mobile-app: An exploratory study.

    María Roncero;Amparo Belloch;Guy Doron

  • Ego-syntonicity and ego-dystonicity of eating-related intrusive thoughts in patients with eating disorders

    María Roncero;Amparo Belloch;Conxa Perpiñá;Conxa Perpiñá;Janet Treasure

  • Part 3: A question of perspective: The association between intrusive thoughts and obsessionality in 11 countries

    David A. Clark;Jon Abramowitz;Gillian M. Alcolado;Pino Alonso

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonardo F. Fontenelle
Leonardo F. Fontenelle Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Guy Doron
Guy Doron Reichman University
Richard Moulding
Richard Moulding Deakin University
Marta Ghisi
Marta Ghisi University of Padua
David A. Clark
David A. Clark University of New Brunswick
Claudio Sica
Claudio Sica University of Florence
María del Pino Alonso Ortega
María del Pino Alonso Ortega Bellvitge University Hospital
Ygor Arzeno Ferrão
Ygor Arzeno Ferrão Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
Donatella Marazziti
Donatella Marazziti University of Pisa
Vladan Starcevic
Vladan Starcevic University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amparo Belloch

Recently Published Articles