World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anja G. Teschemacher

Anja G. Teschemacher

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
5744
World Ranking
7922
National Ranking
595

Anja G. Teschemacher publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anja G. Teschemacher sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 93 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anja G. Teschemacher D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anja G. Teschemacher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anja G. Teschemacher is a researcher affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions span neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, neurology, physiology, and endocrine and autonomic systems.

Their published work includes studies related to neuroscience and neuropharmacology, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, mitochondrial function and pathology, as well as research on neuroscience of respiration and sleep, photodynamic therapy, and nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Sergey Kasparov, Alexander V. Gourine, Olga S. Belozor, Oleg I. Mozhei, and Andrey N. Shuvaev, reflecting ongoing collaborations in related research fields.

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Teschemacher include:

  • Mechanosensory Signaling in Astrocytes, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Adenosine signalling to astrocytes coordinates brain metabolism and function, 2024, Nature
  • Using Light for Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), 2020, Brain Sciences
  • Selective optogenetic stimulation of efferent fibers in the vagus nerve of a large mammal, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • Astrocytes Modulate Baroreflex Sensitivity at the Level of the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience

They have published most frequently in these venues:

  • Brain Sciences
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Nature
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Neurobiology of Disease

Best Publications

  • Astrocytes control breathing through pH-dependent release of ATP

    Alexander V. Gourine;Vitaliy Kasymov;Nephtali Marina;Feige Tang

  • Lactate-mediated glia-neuronal signalling in the mammalian brain

    F Tang;S Lane;A Korsak;Julian F R Paton

  • Functional Oxygen Sensitivity of Astrocytes

    Plamena R. Angelova;Vitaliy Kasymov;Isabel Christie;Shahriar Sheikhbahaei

  • Cardioprotection evoked by remote ischaemic preconditioning is critically dependent on the activity of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones

    Svetlana Mastitskaya;Nephtali Marina;Andrey Gourine;Michael P. Gilbey

  • Is L-lactate a novel signaling molecule in the brain?

    Valentina Mosienko;Anja G Teschemacher;Sergey Kasparov

  • Optoactivation of Locus Ceruleus Neurons Evokes Bidirectional Changes in Thermal Nociception in Rats

    Louise Hickey;Yong Li;Sarah J. Fyson;Thomas C. Watson

  • Inhibition of the current of heterologously expressed HERG potassium channels by imipramine and amitriptyline

    Anja G Teschemacher;Elizabeth P Seward;Jules C Hancox;Harry J Witchel

  • Ultrastructural Correlates of Enhanced Norepinephrine and Neuropeptide Y Cotransmission in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Brain.

    Ioannis Kourtesis;Sergey Kasparov;Paul Verkade;Anja G Teschemacher

  • Astrocytes modulate brainstem respiratory rhythm-generating circuits and determine exercise capacity.

    Shahriar Sheikhbahaei;Egor A. Turovsky;Egor A. Turovsky;Patrick S. Hosford;Anna Hadjihambi

  • Astroglia as a cellular target for neuroprotection and treatment of neuro‐psychiatric disorders

    Beihui Liu;Anja G. Teschemacher;Sergey Kasparov

  • Involvement of PKCα and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in agonist-selective desensitization of µ-opioid receptors in mature brain neurons

    Christopher P Bailey;S Oldfield;J Llorente;Christopher J Caunt

  • Imaging Ca2+ concentration changes at the secretory vesicle surface with a recombinant targeted cameleon

    Evaggelia Emmanouilidou;Anja G. Teschemacher;Aristea E. Pouli;Linda I. Nicholls

  • Brainstem Hypoxia Contributes to the Development of Hypertension in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat

    Nephtali Marina;Richard Ang;Asif Machhada;Vitaliy Kasymov

  • Adenosine signalling to astrocytes coordinates brain metabolism and function

    Unknown

  • Purinergic signalling in the rostral ventro-lateral medulla controls sympathetic drive and contributes to the progression of heart failure following myocardial infarction in rats

    Nephtali Marina;Feige Tang;Melina Figueiredo;Svetlana Mastitskaya

  • Mechanosensory Signaling in Astrocytes

    Egor A. Turovsky;Alice Braga;Yichao Yu;Noemi Esteras

  • Retrograde adenoviral vector targeting of nociresponsive pontospinal noradrenergic neurons in the rat in vivo.

    Patrick W Howorth;Anja G Teschemacher;Anthony E Pickering

  • 35th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes : Brussels, Belgium, 28 September-2 October 1999.

    A Melander;J Olsson;G Lindberg;A Salzman

  • Optogenetic experimentation on astrocytes.

    MF Figueiredo;SL Lane;F Tang;BH Liu

  • Differences in transductional tropism of adenoviral and lentiviral vectors in the rat brainstem.

    Hanad Duale;Sergey Kasparov;Julian F. R. Paton;Anja G. Teschemacher

  • Comparative analysis of optogenetic actuators in cultured astrocytes.

    Melina Figueiredo;Samantha Lane;Randy F Stout;Beihui Liu

  • Mechanism of nitric oxide action on inhibitory GABAergic signaling within the nucleus tractus solitarii

    Sheng Wang;Anja G. Teschemacher;Julian F. R. Paton;Sergey Kasparov

  • Restraining influence of A2 neurons in chronic control of arterial pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats

    Hanad Duale;Hidefumi Waki;Patrick Howorth;Sergey Kasparov

  • Glio‐ and neuro‐protection by prosaposin is mediated by orphan G‐protein coupled receptors GPR37L1 and GPR37

    Beihui Liu;Valentina Mosienko;Barbara Vaccari Cardoso;Daria Prokudina

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergey Kasparov
Sergey Kasparov University of Bristol
Alexander V. Gourine
Alexander V. Gourine University College London
Julian F. R. Paton
Julian F. R. Paton University of Auckland
Anthony E. Pickering
Anthony E. Pickering University of Bristol
George Howard
George Howard University of Alabama at Birmingham
Ralph B. D'Agostino
Ralph B. D'Agostino Wake Forest University
Leena Mykkänen
Leena Mykkänen The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Andrey Y. Abramov
Andrey Y. Abramov University College London
Hans Eiberg
Hans Eiberg University of Copenhagen
Timothy J. Aitman
Timothy J. Aitman University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees that can broaden your skillset and open alternative pathways in mental health, research, and clinical practice. For those interested in a strong foundational understanding of human behavior, psychology degrees online offer affordable options for studying core psychological principles and research methods.

Another potential route is a Master of Social Work. If you are wondering how long does it take to get a msw online, the answer is typically 2-3 years, with flexible programs and accelerated tracks available. For those looking to become licensed clinical psychologists, there are online psyd programs designed to fit around professional or personal obligations, while delivering rigorous clinical training.

If your interests lie in relationship dynamics or family systems, marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by reputable boards can prepare you for licensure and clinical practice much faster than traditional routes. Pursuing any of these programs online allows for flexibility, but candidates should always ensure accreditation and alignment with career goals before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Anja G. Teschemacher

Trending Scientists