World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 73 19612 9764 101 21734

Leena Mykkänen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leena Mykkänen between 1987 and 2009, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leena Mykkänen published across 23 years, from 1987 to 2009, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 1994. 1 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2009. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 1994. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 18 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication
1987 2009

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leena Mykkänen: publications per year, 1987 to 2009
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 5
1994 18
1995 11
1996 5
1997 12
1998 7
1999 11
2000 14
2001 3
2002 0
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
Total 101
Download as CSV

Leena Mykkänen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leena Mykkänen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 101 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5 101
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Leena Mykkänen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leena Mykkänen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391 73
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Leena Mykkänen is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio in the United States. Their academic work is positioned within this institution, contributing to its research environment and initiatives.

While detailed data on publications, co-authorships, and frequent publication venues are not available, the affiliation information suggests engagement in health science research with a focus potentially aligned with the university's scope.

No specific main fields or subfields of study have been listed, which limits the ability to describe particular research areas or specializations with precision. Likewise, there is no information on main research topics that Leena Mykkänen has addressed in their work.

There are no records of recent papers, book publications, or awards linked to Leena Mykkänen in the current data. This absence implies either that such information has not been documented here or that the researcher may be in an early stage or a more focused role in research that does not include widely published outputs at this time.

This profile reflects available academic metadata and institutional affiliation as key elements to outline the scientist's professional context. Additional information would be required to provide a more comprehensive view of their scholarly contributions and impact.

Best Publications

  • Chronic Subclinical Inflammation as Part of the Insulin Resistance Syndrome The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS)

    Andreas Festa;Ralph D’Agostino;George Howard;Leena Mykkänen

  • A Pro12Ala substitution in PPARgamma2 associated with decreased receptor activity, lower body mass index and improved insulin sensitivity.

    Samir S. Deeb;Lluis Fajas;Masami Nemoto;Jussi Pihlajamäki

  • NIDDM and Its Metabolic Control Predict Coronary Heart Disease in Elderly Subjects

    Johanna Kuusisto;Leena Mykkänen;Kalevi Pyörälä;Markku Laakso

  • Insulin-Resistant Prediabetic Subjects Have More Atherogenic Risk Factors Than Insulin-Sensitive Prediabetic Subjects Implications for Preventing Coronary Heart Disease During the Prediabetic State

    Steven M. Haffner;Leena Mykkänen;Andreas Festa;James P. Burke

  • Increased Insulin Resistance and Insulin Secretion in Nondiabetic African-Americans and Hispanics Compared With Non-Hispanic Whites: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study

    S M Haffner;R D'Agostino;M F Saad;M Rewers

  • Association between features of the insulin resistance syndrome and alzheimer's disease independently of apolipoprotein e4 phenotype: cross sectional population based study

    J. Kuusisto;K. Koivisto;L. Mykkänen;E. L. Helkala

  • Insulin sensitivity in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Relationship to cardiovascular risk factors: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.

    Steven M. Haffner;Ralph D'Agostino;Leena Mykkänen;Russell Tracy

  • Inflammation and microalbuminuria in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.

    Andreas Festa;Ralph D'agostino;Ralph D'agostino;Ralph D'agostino;George Howard;George Howard;George Howard;Leena Mykkänen;Leena Mykkänen;Leena Mykkänen

  • Microalbuminuria is associated with insulin resistance in nondiabetic subjects: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study.

    L Mykkänen;D J Zaccaro;L E Wagenknecht;D C Robbins

  • Insulin Resistance Syndrome Predicts Coronary Heart Disease Events in Elderly Nondiabetic Men

    Päivi Lempiäinen;Leena Mykkänen;Kalevi Pyörälä;Markku Laakso

  • Insulin Resistance, Body Fat Distribution, and Sex Hormones in Men

    Steven M Haffner;Pauli Karhapää;Leena Mykkänen;Markku Laakso

  • Relative Contribution of Insulin and Its Precursors to Fibrinogen and PAI-1 in a Large Population With Different States of Glucose Tolerance

    Andreas Festa;Ralph D’Agostino;Leena Mykkänen;Russell P. Tracy

  • Insulin resistance is associated with lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities in subjects with varying degrees of glucose tolerance.

    M Laakso;H Sarlund;L Mykkänen

  • Hyperinsulinemic microalbuminuria. A new risk indicator for coronary heart disease.

    Johanna Kuusisto;Leena Mykkänen;Kalevi Pyörälä;Markku Laakso

  • Subjective memory complaints and personality traits in normal elderly subjects

    Tuomo Hänninen;Kari J. Reinikainen;Eeva-Liisa Helkala;Keijo Koivisto

  • Decreased Testosterone and Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Concentrations Are Associated With Increased Insulin and Glucose Concentrations in Nondiabetic Men

    Steven M. Haffner;Rodolfo A. Valdez;Rodolfo A. Valdez;Leena Mykkänen;Leena Mykkänen;Michael P. Stern;Michael P. Stern

  • Relationship of sex hormones to lipids and lipoproteins in nondiabetic men.

    Steven M. Haffner;Leena Mykkänen;Rodolfo A. Valdez;Michael S. Katz

  • Cardiovascular disease risk factors as predictors of Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in elderly subjects

    L. Mykkänen;J. Kuusisto;K. Pyörälä;M. Laakso

  • Microalbuminuria and Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness in Nondiabetic and NIDDM Subjects: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS)

    Leena Mykkänen;Daniel J. Zaccaro;Daniel H. O’Leary;George Howard

  • Non-insulin-dependent diabetes and its metabolic control are important predictors of stroke in elderly subjects.

    J Kuusisto;L Mykkänen;K Pyörälä;M Laakso

Frequent Co-Authors

Markku Laakso
Markku Laakso University of Eastern Finland
Steven M. Haffner
Steven M. Haffner The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Johanna Kuusisto
Johanna Kuusisto University of Eastern Finland
Ralph B. D'Agostino
Ralph B. D'Agostino Wake Forest University
Kalevi Pyörälä
Kalevi Pyörälä University of Eastern Finland
George Howard
George Howard University of Alabama at Birmingham
Richard N. Bergman
Richard N. Bergman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Michael P. Stern
Michael P. Stern The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
C. N. Hales
C. N. Hales University of Cambridge
Barbara V. Howard
Barbara V. Howard MedStar Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up diverse online degree and career options for those interested in healthcare fields. Many students choose direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles, even if they come from non-nursing backgrounds.

Those looking for accessible education in nursing may be interested in the easiest nursing schools to get into, which provide flexible admission standards without compromising education quality. Additionally, accelerated BSN degrees are available at absn programs that don't require teas, allowing students to skip standardized entry exams and start training sooner.

Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. Many aspiring professionals explore allied fields such as administration, and with the support of medical billing and coding financial aid options, you can launch a rewarding career behind the scenes in healthcare systems.

These alternative online degrees and flexible pathways provide more options for starting a healthcare career, whether your interests are in nursing, administration, or specialized support roles.

Best Scientists Citing Leena Mykkänen

Recently Published Articles