World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
56223
World Ranking
8745
National Ranking
852

C. N. Hales publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. N. Hales sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 270 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

C. N. Hales D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. N. Hales sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - Baly Medal, Royal College of Physicians of London

Overview

C. N. Hales was affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focused on medicine, with a notable concentration in public health, environmental and occupational health, physiology, pharmacology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and epidemiology.

Their work covered a diverse range of topics, including:

  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Among the recent published papers associated with or closely connected to their field are:

  • "Trends in Obesity Prevalence by Race and Hispanic Origin-1999-2000 to 2017-2018" (2020), published in JAMA
  • "A method for calculating BMI z-scores and percentiles above the 95th percentile of the CDC growth charts" (2020), published in Annals of Human Biology
  • "Dietary Supplement Use in Children and Adolescents Aged ≤19 Years - United States, 2017-2018" (2020), published in MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • "Changes in adiposity among children and adolescents in the United States, 1999-2006 to 2011-2018" (2021), published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • "Prevalence of Obesity and CKD Among Adults in the United States, 2017-2020" (2022), published in Kidney Medicine

The frequent co-authors who contributed extensively alongside C. N. Hales included:

  • Cynthia L. Ogden
  • Crescent B. Martin
  • David S. Freedman
  • Bryan Stierman
  • Edwina Wambogo

The prominent venues that frequently published their or related work were:

  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • PEDIATRICS
  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • JAMA

C. N. Hales was awarded the Baly Medal by the Royal College of Physicians of London in 1995.

Best Publications

  • The glucose fatty-acid cycle. Its role in insulin sensitivity and the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus.

    P.J. Randle;P.B. Garland;C.N. Hales;E.A. Newsholme

  • Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis

    C. N. Hales;D. J. P. Barker

  • The thrifty phenotype hypothesis.

    C N Hales;D J Barker

  • Fetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64.

    C. N. Hales;D. J. P. Barker;P. M. S. Clark;L. J. Cox

  • Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia (syndrome X): relation to reduced fetal growth

    D. J. P. Barker;C. N. Hales;C. H. D. Fall;C. Osmond

  • Glucose tolerance in adults after prenatal exposure to famine.

    A. C. J. Ravelli;J. H. P. Van Der Meulen;R. P. J. Michels;C. Osmond

  • Thinness at birth and insulin resistance in adult life.

    D. I. W. Phillips;D. J. P. Barker;C. N. Hales;S. Hirst

  • Understanding Oral Glucose Tolerance: Comparison of Glucose or Insulin Measurements During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test with Specific Measurements of Insulin Resistance and Insulin Secretion

    D.I.W. Phillips;P.M. Clark;C.N. Hales;C. Osmond

  • Growth in utero and serum cholesterol concentrations in adult life.

    D. J. P. Barker;C. N. Martyn;C. Osmond;C. N. Hales

  • Fetal growth and impaired glucose tolerance in men and women

    K. Phipps;D. J. P. Barker;C. N. Hales;C. H. D. Fall

  • Fetal and infant growth and cardiovascular risk factors in women.

    C H D Fall;C Osmond;D J P Barker;P M S Clark

  • Glucose intolerance and impairment of insulin secretion in relation to vitamin D deficiency in East London Asians

    B. J. Boucher;N. Mannan;K. Noonan;C. N. Hales

  • Relation of infant feeding to adult serum cholesterol concentration and death from ischaemic heart disease.

    C. H. Fall;D. J. Barker;C. Osmond;P. D. Winter

  • Organ-selective growth in the offspring of protein-restricted mothers.

    M Desai;N J Crowther;A Lucas;C N Hales

  • EFFECTS OF LOW-CARBOHYDRATE DIET AND DIABETES MELLITUS ON PLASMA CONCENTRATIONS OF GLUCOSE, NON-ESTERIFIED FATTY ACID, AND INSULIN DURING ORAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TESTS

    C.N. Hales;P.J. Randle

  • Early programming of glucose–insulin metabolism

    Susan E Ozanne;C.Nicholas Hales

  • Fetal growth and glucose and insulin metabolism in four-year-old Indian children.

    C.S. Yajnik;C.H.D. Fall;U. Vaidya;A.N. Pandit

  • Early growth determines longevity in male rats and may be related to telomere shortening in the kidney

    B.J. Jennings;S.E. Ozanne;M.W. Dorling;C.N. Hales

  • The role of calcium and magnesium in insulin secretion from rabbit pancreas studied in vitro.

    R. D. G. Milner;C. N. Hales

  • ROLE OF FETAL AND INFANT GROWTH IN PROGRAMMING METABOLISM IN LATER LIFE

    M. Desai;C. N. Hales

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan E. Ozanne
Susan E. Ozanne University of Cambridge
Christopher D. Byrne
Christopher D. Byrne University of Southampton
Clive Osmond
Clive Osmond University of Southampton
Michael L. J. Ashford
Michael L. J. Ashford University of Dundee
Nicholas J. Wareham
Nicholas J. Wareham University of Cambridge
Nicholas E. Day
Nicholas E. Day University of Cambridge
Leena Mykkänen
Leena Mykkänen The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
David J. P. Barker
David J. P. Barker University of Southampton
Melanie J. Davies
Melanie J. Davies University of Leicester
Ralph B. D'Agostino
Ralph B. D'Agostino Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary career pathways in the healthcare field can open rewarding opportunities, even for those not pursuing the traditional MD route. Many students are now considering online degree options that offer flexibility, affordability, and direct routes into critical healthcare roles.

For those interested in health administration, the most affordable mha programs can prepare graduates for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and other organizations. Similarly, nurses aiming to advance into clinical leadership may benefit from dnp online programs cheap, which build on practical experience and emphasize evidence-based care.

Students focused on pharmaceutical sciences can opt for pharmacy school online options to become licensed pharmacists. Additionally, those with an interest in health data can pursue a health information management degree online to play an essential role in the digital transformation of healthcare.

Each of these degrees offers a unique blend of patient care, technology, and leadership—helping graduates thrive in a fast-evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing C. N. Hales