World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 131 2393 2229 1350 1239 472 66392

Elias Anaissie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elias Anaissie between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elias Anaissie published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2004. 1 of the 494 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2004. 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 22 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 40 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 29 publications 2009: 38 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 21 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1985 2025

494 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elias Anaissie: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 3
1986 3
1987 6
1988 6
1989 6
1990 4
1991 7
1992 11
1993 11
1994 12
1995 12
1996 14
1997 11
1998 17
1999 12
2000 9
2001 15
2002 22
2003 15
2004 40
2005 28
2006 30
2007 23
2008 29
2009 38
2010 24
2011 16
2012 14
2013 14
2014 7
2015 5
2016 0
2017 2
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 3
2022 1
2023 21
2024 0
2025 1
Total 494
Download as CSV

Elias Anaissie publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elias Anaissie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 472 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 472
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Elias Anaissie D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elias Anaissie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 130–131 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 131 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179 131
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elias Anaissie is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States, contributing to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans several subfields including epidemiology, hematology, infectious diseases, cell biology, and genetics.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, with particular emphasis on antifungal resistance and susceptibility, fungal infections and studies, plant pathogens and fungal diseases, multiple myeloma research and treatments, drug-induced hepatotoxicity and protection, cancer therapeutics and mechanisms, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia research.

Major recent publications authored or coauthored by Elias Anaissie include:

  • Consensus guidelines and recommendations for infection prevention in multiple myeloma: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group, 2022, The Lancet Haematology
  • Invasive Fusariosis in Patients with Hematologic Diseases, 2021, Journal of Fungi
  • Invasive fusariosis, 2023, Clinical Microbiology Reviews
  • Healthcare utilization and cost of cancer-related care prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies in the US: a retrospective real-world analysis, 2021, BMC Health Services Research
  • Serum 1,3-beta-D-glucan as a noninvasive test to predict histologic activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, 2021, World Journal of Gastroenterology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Márcio Nucci, Noopur Raje, Shaji Kumar, Sagar Lonial, and Thomas G Martin.

The scientist has published in the following scientific venues:

  • The Lancet Haematology
  • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
  • Journal of Fungi
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • World Journal of Gastroenterology

Best Publications

  • Treatment of Aspergillosis: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

    Thomas J. Walsh;Elias J. Anaissie;David W. Denning;Raoul Herbrecht

  • Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma.

    S Singhal;J Mehta;R Desikan;D Ayers

  • Prospective Surveillance for Invasive Fungal Infections in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients, 2001–2006: Overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) Database

    Dimitrios P. Kontoyiennis;Kieren A. Marr;Benjamin J. Park;Barbara D. Alexander

  • Invasive Fungal Infections among Organ Transplant Recipients: Results of the Transplant‐Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET)

    Peter G. Pappas;Barbara D. Alexander;David R. Andes;Susan Hadley

  • The molecular classification of multiple myeloma

    Fenghuang Zhan;Yongsheng Huang;Yongsheng Huang;Simona Colla;Simona Colla;James P. Stewart;James P. Stewart

  • Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever

    Thomas J. Walsh;Peter Pappas;Drew J. Winston;Hillard M. Lazarus

  • Epidemiology and Outcomes of Candidemia in 2019 Patients: Data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy Alliance Registry

    David L. Horn;Dionissios Neofytos;Dionissios Neofytos;Elias J. Anaissie;Jay A. Fishman

  • Fusarium Infections in Immunocompromised Patients

    Marcio Nucci;Elias Anaissie

  • Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infection in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: analysis of Multicenter Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) Alliance registry.

    Dionissios Neofytos;D. Horn;E. Anaissie;W. Steinbach

  • A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1

    John D. Shaughnessy;Fenghuang Zhan;Bart E. Burington;Yongsheng Huang

  • The Epidemiology of Hematogenous Candidiasis Caused by Different Candida Species

    Dima Abi-Said;Elias Anaissie;Omrum Uzun;Issam Raad

  • Taxonomy, biology, and clinical aspects of Fusarium species.

    P E Nelson;M C Dignani;E J Anaissie

  • Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

    Bart Barlogie;Guido Tricot;Elias Anaissie;John Shaughnessy

  • Global gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cells

    Fenghuang Zhan;Johanna S. Hardin;Bob Kordsmeier;Klaus Bumm

  • Amphotericin B Lipid Complex for Invasive Fungal Infections: Analysis of Safety and Efficacy in 556 Cases

    Thomas J. Walsh;John W. Hiemenz;Nita L. Seibel;John R. Perfect

  • Total Therapy With Tandem Transplants for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

    B. Barlogie;S. Jagannath;K.R. Desikan;S. Mattox

  • Ultrastructural Analysis of Indwelling Vascular Catheters: A Quantitative Relationship between Luminal Colonization and Duration of Placement

    Issam Raad;William Costerton;William Costerton;Ushi Sabharwal;Ushi Sabharwal;Mary Sadlowski;Mary Sadlowski

  • Extended survival in advanced and refractory multiple myeloma after single-agent thalidomide: identification of prognostic factors in a phase 2 study of 169 patients.

    Bart Barlogie;Raman Desikan;Raman Desikan;Paul Eddlemon;Paul Eddlemon;Trey Spencer;Trey Spencer

  • Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens.

    T.J. Walsh;A. Groll;J. Hiemenz;R. Fleming

  • Fusarium, a significant emerging pathogen in patients with hematologic malignancy: ten years' experience at a cancer center and implications for management.

    Eleni I. Boutati;Elias J. Anaissie

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart Barlogie
Bart Barlogie Mount Sinai Hospital
Frits van Rhee
Frits van Rhee University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Guido Tricot
Guido Tricot University of Iowa
Maurizio Zangari
Maurizio Zangari University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
John D. Shaughnessy
John D. Shaughnessy University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
John Crowley
John Crowley Washington University in St. Louis
Joshua Epstein
Joshua Epstein University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Marcio Nucci
Marcio Nucci Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Kieren A. Marr
Kieren A. Marr Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John H. Rex
John H. Rex The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Medicine in the USA, it's important to consider related career pathways and online degree options that support growth in healthcare. Many professionals are turning to dnp online programs to advance their nursing education with greater flexibility and efficiency.

For those seeking the most accessible routes, dnp programs offer pathways designed to balance academic rigor with practical entry requirements. These options are ideal for working nurses hoping to transition into leadership positions without putting their careers on hold.

If you're interested in quickly entering the healthcare workforce, fast track medical programs can accelerate your journey to becoming a licensed practical nurse (LPN). Accelerated and online options make it easier to start making a difference in patient care sooner.

Growing mental health needs have also increased interest in advanced roles. accelerated msn psychiatric np programs help qualified nurses gain advanced expertise in mental health in less time, expanding career opportunities while addressing national shortages.

Best Scientists Citing Elias Anaissie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles