World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 56 4458 4093 124 117 412 15444

Olivier Salvado publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Olivier Salvado between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Olivier Salvado published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 22.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2017. 19 of the 502 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2017. 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 47 publications 2012: 42 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 55 publications 2018: 42 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 7 publications
2004 2025

502 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Olivier Salvado: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 5
2005 4
2006 9
2007 5
2008 23
2009 21
2010 30
2011 47
2012 42
2013 32
2014 29
2015 33
2016 36
2017 55
2018 42
2019 18
2020 17
2021 15
2022 10
2023 10
2024 12
2025 7
Total 502
Download as CSV

Olivier Salvado publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Salvado sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 408–417 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 412 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49 412
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Olivier Salvado D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Salvado sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357 56
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Olivier Salvado is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields with a predominant focus on Medicine and Computer Science.

The scientist's work covers various specialized subfields, including:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Physiology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

Olivier Salvado has contributed to several recent papers that focus on neurodegenerative conditions and neuroimaging methodologies. Notable publications include:

  • "Fifteen Years of the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study: Progress and Observations from 2,359 Older Adults Spanning the Spectrum from Cognitive Normality to Alzheimer's Disease," 2021, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports
  • "Association of β-Amyloid Level, Clinical Progression, and Longitudinal Cognitive Change in Normal Older Individuals," 2020, Neurology
  • "A prospective cohort study of prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Prospective Imaging Study of Ageing: Genes, Brain and Behaviour (PISA)," 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • "Deferiprone in Alzheimer Disease," 2024, JAMA Neurology
  • "Impact of APOE-ε4 carriage on the onset and rates of neocortical Aβ-amyloid deposition," 2020, Neurobiology of Aging

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Pierrick Bourgeat
  • Jürgen Fripp
  • Clinton Fookes
  • Rodrigo Santa Cruz
  • Léo Lebrat

Olivier Salvado's work has been published repeatedly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports
  • ACM Computing Surveys

Best Publications

  • Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study.

    Victor L. Villemagne;Samantha Burnham;Pierrick Bourgeat;Belinda M. Brown

  • Amyloid imaging results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging

    Christopher C Rowe;Kathryn A Ellis;Kathryn A Ellis;Miroslava Rimajova;Pierrick Bourgeat

  • Longitudinal Assessment of Aβ and Cognition in Aging and Alzheimer Disease

    Victor L Villemagne;Kerryn E Pike;Gaël Chételat;Kathryn A Ellis

  • Apparent Fibre Density: a novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images.

    David Raffelt;Jacques-Donald Tournier;Stephen E. Rose;Gerard R. Ridgway

  • Relationship between atrophy and beta-amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease.

    Gaël Chételat;Victor L. Villemagne;Pierrick Bourgeat;Kerryn E. Pike

  • An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy.

    Jason A. Dowling;Jonathan Lambert;Joel Parker;Olivier Salvado

  • Retinal vascular biomarkers for early detection and monitoring of Alzheimer’s disease

    Shawn Frost;Shawn Frost;Yogi Kanagasingam;Hamid Sohrabi;J Vignarajan

  • Fibre-specific white matter reductions in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

    Remika Mito;Remika Mito;David Raffelt;Thijs Dhollander;David N Vaughan;David N Vaughan

  • Symmetric diffeomorphic registration of fibre orientation distributions

    David Raffelt;Jacques-Donald Tournier;Jurgen Fripp;Stuart Crozier

  • Regional dynamics of amyloid-β deposition in healthy elderly, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a voxelwise PiB–PET longitudinal study

    Nicolas Villain;Gaël Chételat;Blandine Grassiot;Pierrick Bourgeat

  • Cerebral quantitative susceptibility mapping predicts amyloid-β-related cognitive decline.

    Scott Ayton;Amir Fazlollahi;Amir Fazlollahi;Pierrick Bourgeat;Pierrick Bourgeat;Parnesh Raniga

  • Clinical and cognitive trajectories in cognitively healthy elderly individuals with suspected non-Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology (SNAP) or Alzheimer's disease pathology : a longitudinal study

    Samantha C. Burnham;Pierrick T. Bourgeat;Vincent Doré;Greg R. Savage

  • Beta-amyloid burden in the temporal neocortex is related to hippocampal atrophy in elderly subjects without dementia.

    P. Bourgeat;G. Chételat;G. Chételat;V.L. Villemagne;V.L. Villemagne;J. Fripp

  • Predicting Alzheimer disease with β-amyloid imaging: Results from the Australian imaging, biomarkers, and lifestyle study of ageing

    Christopher C. Rowe;Pierrick Bourgeat;Kathryn A. Ellis;Belinda M. Brown

  • MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy planning: Investigation of dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based dose planning

    Jonathan Lambert;Peter B. Greer;Peter B. Greer;Fred Menk;Jackie Patterson

  • Incidence of cerebral microbleeds in preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Paul A. Yates;Patricia M. Desmond;Patricia M. Desmond;Pramit M. Phal;Christopher Steward;Christopher Steward

  • Lesion segmentation from multimodal MRI using random forest following ischemic stroke

    Jhimli Mitra;Pierrick Bourgeat;Jurgen Fripp;Soumya Ghose

  • Larger temporal volume in elderly with high versus low beta-amyloid deposition

    Gaël Chételat;Victor L. Villemagne;Kerryn E. Pike;Jean Claude Baron

  • Implementing the centiloid transformation for 11C-PiB and β-amyloid 18F-PET tracers using CapAIBL.

    Pierrick Bourgeat;Vincent Doré;Jurgen Fripp;David Ames

  • Aβ-amyloid and Tau Imaging in Dementia

    Victor L. Villemagne;Victor L. Villemagne;Vincent Doré;Pierrick Bourgeat;Samantha C. Burnham

  • Independent contribution of temporal β-amyloid deposition to memory decline in the pre-dementia phase of Alzheimer’s disease

    Gaël Chételat;Victor L. Villemagne;Kerryn E. Pike;Kathryn A. Ellis

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher C. Rowe
Christopher C. Rowe University of Melbourne
Victor L. Villemagne
Victor L. Villemagne University of Pittsburgh
David Ames
David Ames University of Melbourne
Ralph N. Martins
Ralph N. Martins Edith Cowan University
Colin L. Masters
Colin L. Masters University of Melbourne
Kathryn A. Ellis
Kathryn A. Ellis University of Melbourne
Paul Maruff
Paul Maruff University of Melbourne
Cassandra Szoeke
Cassandra Szoeke University of Melbourne
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Hamid R. Sohrabi
Hamid R. Sohrabi Murdoch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a variety of rewarding roles in healthcare, research, and tech. For those seeking flexibility, earning an online bachelor's degree is a popular and convenient pathway. Many reputable institutions now offer neuroscience or related fields 100% online, making it easier to balance study with work or family responsibilities.

Choosing the right degree is important for your career. Neuroscience often ranks among the best degree in the world for those interested in high-demand, high-paying roles. Additionally, students can find majors that are not only intellectually stimulating but qualify as fun majors in college that pay well, such as cognitive science or biomedical engineering.

Budget is always a consideration. To reduce financial stress, many online colleges that accept financial aid can also make advanced study more affordable. These options ensure a broader range of students can pursue their passion for neuroscience while preparing for diverse, lucrative career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Salvado

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles