World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6191 5753 358 349 185 8483

Yen Ying Lim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yen Ying Lim between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yen Ying Lim published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 15.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2023. 38 of the 270 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2023. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 16 publications
2009 2025

270 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yen Ying Lim: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 9
2013 17
2014 12
2015 20
2016 25
2017 20
2018 26
2019 18
2020 16
2021 16
2022 24
2023 28
2024 22
2025 16
Total 270
Download as CSV

Yen Ying Lim publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yen Ying Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 185 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 185
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Yen Ying Lim D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yen Ying Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Yen Ying Lim is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has made significant contributions within the field of Medicine, particularly focusing on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, as well as broader areas related to Health.

Their research mainly revolves around Dementia and Cognitive Impairment, with a substantial focus on Alzheimer's disease research and treatments. Other important topics covered by their work include Health, Environment, and Cognitive Aging, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, Frailty in Older Adults, and Nutritional Studies and Diet.

Recent key publications by Yen Ying Lim are as follows:

  • Fifteen Years of the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study: Progress and Observations from 2,359 Older Adults Spanning the Spectrum from Cognitive Normality to Alzheimer's Disease, 2021, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports
  • Association of β-Amyloid Level, Clinical Progression, and Longitudinal Cognitive Change in Normal Older Individuals, 2020, Neurology
  • Predicting sporadic Alzheimer's disease progression via inherited Alzheimer's disease-informed machine-learning, 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Association of Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Measures With Cognition and Dementia Risk in Australian Adults, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Association of deficits in short-term learning and Aβ and hippocampal volume in cognitively normal adults, 2020, Neurology

Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Paul Maruff (76 publications)
  • Colin L. Masters (36 publications)
  • Nawaf Yassi (33 publications)
  • Rachel F. Buckley (33 publications)
  • Matthew P. Pase (30 publications)

Yen Ying Lim has published extensively in several key venues known within the Alzheimer's and dementia research communities, including:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia (44 publications)
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease (9 publications)
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports (3 publications)
  • Neurology (3 publications)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance

    Yaakov Stern;Eider M. Arenaza-Urquijo;David Bartrés-Faz;Sylvie Belleville

  • Cerebral quantitative susceptibility mapping predicts amyloid-β-related cognitive decline.

    Scott Ayton;Amir Fazlollahi;Amir Fazlollahi;Pierrick Bourgeat;Pierrick Bourgeat;Parnesh Raniga

  • Sex, amyloid, and APOE ε4 and risk of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Findings from three well-characterized cohorts.

    Rachel F. Buckley;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Michael J. Properzi

  • Predicting Alzheimer disease with β-amyloid imaging: Results from the Australian imaging, biomarkers, and lifestyle study of ageing

    Christopher C. Rowe;Pierrick Bourgeat;Kathryn A. Ellis;Belinda M. Brown

  • Effect of amyloid on memory and non-memory decline from preclinical to clinical Alzheimer's disease

    Yen Ying Lim;Paul Thomas Maruff;Robert H. Pietrzak;David Ames

  • Clinical utility of the cogstate brief battery in identifying cognitive impairment in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease

    Paul Maruff;Yen Ying Lim;David Darby;Kathryn A Ellis;Kathryn A Ellis

  • Amyloid-β, Anxiety, and Cognitive Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study

    Robert H. Pietrzak;Robert H. Pietrzak;Yen Ying Lim;Yen Ying Lim;Alexander Neumeister;David Ames;David Ames

  • Cognitive impairment and decline in cognitively normal older adults with high amyloid-β: A meta-analysis

    Jenalle E. Baker;Yen Ying Lim;Robert H. Pietrzak;Jason Hassenstab

  • Combined neuropathological pathways account for age‐related risk of dementia

    Melinda C. Power;Elizabeth Mormino;Anja Soldan;Bryan D. James

  • Dietary patterns and cognitive decline in an Australian study of ageing

    S. L. Gardener;S. L. Gardener;Stephanie R. Rainey-Smith;Stephanie R. Rainey-Smith;Margaret Barnes;H. R. Sohrabi;H. R. Sohrabi

  • Use of the CogState Brief Battery in the assessment of Alzheimer's disease related cognitive impairment in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study

    Yen Ying Lim;Kathryn A Ellis;Karra Harrington;David Ames

  • APOE and BDNF polymorphisms moderate amyloid β-related cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

    Yen Ying Lim;Yen Ying Lim;Yen Ying Lim;Victor L Villemagne;Victor L Villemagne;Simon M Laws;Simon M Laws;Simon M Laws;R H Pietrzak

  • Three-Month Stability of the CogState Brief Battery in Healthy Older Adults, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer's Disease: Results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle-Rate of Change Substudy (AIBL-ROCS)

    Yen Ying Lim;Judith Jaeger;Judith Jaeger;Karra J. Harrington;Tim J. Ashwood

  • BDNF Val66Met, Aβ amyloid, and cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Yen Ying Lim;Victor L Villemagne;Simon M Laws;Simon M Laws;David J Ames

  • Determining clinically meaningful decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Philip S. Insel;Michael Weiner;Michael Weiner;R. Scott Mackin;R. Scott Mackin;Elizabeth Mormino

  • APOE genotype and early β-amyloid accumulation in older adults without dementia.

    Yen Ying Lim;Elizabeth C. Mormino

  • Nonvascular retinal imaging markers of preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Peter J. Snyder;Peter J. Snyder;Lenworth N. Johnson;Lenworth N. Johnson;Yen Ying Lim;Cláudia Y. Santos;Cláudia Y. Santos

  • Sensitivity of composite scores to amyloid burden in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Introducing the Z-scores of Attention, Verbal fluency, and Episodic memory for Nondemented older adults composite score

    Yen Ying Lim;Peter J. Snyder;Robert H. Pietrzak;Albulene Ukiqi

  • Stronger effect of amyloid load than APOE genotype on cognitive decline in healthy older adults

    Yen Ying Lim;Kathryn A. Ellis;Robert H. Pietrzak;David Ames

  • Effect of BDNF Val66Met on Memory Decline and Hippocampal Atrophy in Prodromal Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preliminary Study

    Yen Ying Lim;Victor L. Villemagne;Simon M. Laws;Simon M. Laws;Simon M. Laws;David Ames

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Maruff
Paul Maruff University of Melbourne
Victor L. Villemagne
Victor L. Villemagne University of Pittsburgh
David Ames
David Ames University of Melbourne
Christopher C. Rowe
Christopher C. Rowe University of Melbourne
Ralph N. Martins
Ralph N. Martins Edith Cowan University
Robert H. Pietrzak
Robert H. Pietrzak Yale University
Kathryn A. Ellis
Kathryn A. Ellis University of Melbourne
Peter J. Snyder
Peter J. Snyder University of Rhode Island
Colin L. Masters
Colin L. Masters University of Melbourne
Olivier Salvado
Olivier Salvado Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a range of rewarding career options. One popular pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a specialist who applies behavioral science principles to improve lives, especially for individuals with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental conditions.

The journey to becoming a BCBA often begins with an online master’s degree in psychology or applied behavior analysis, which combines academic knowledge with supervised experience. Each state—and sometimes even individual cities—can have unique requirements for aspiring BCBAs. It's essential to understand local licensing steps, practical experience needs, and exam expectations.

For more details, you can learn about becoming a bcba in Irvine or explore the specific process of becoming a bcba in Irving. If you plan to practice in Florida, check out the Jacksonville bcba requirements. Those in the Northeast may find useful tips on becoming a bcba in Jersey City.

No matter where you study, online degrees make it easier to balance your career goals with your current lifestyle, while meeting all prerequisites for future advancement in the psychology field.

Best Scientists Citing Yen Ying Lim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles