World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Czechia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 54 4034 3858 8 8 148 10963

Michael Komárek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Komárek between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Komárek published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2024. 33 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2024. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 11 publications
2004 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Komárek: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 3
2008 5
2009 8
2010 6
2011 4
2012 9
2013 13
2014 9
2015 12
2016 14
2017 13
2018 12
2019 11
2020 5
2021 8
2022 20
2023 8
2024 22
2025 11
Total 197
Download as CSV

Michael Komárek publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Komárek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 148
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Komárek D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Komárek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198 54
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Czechia Leader Award

Overview

Michael Komárek is affiliated with the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and engineering, with particular attention to pollution and related subfields such as health, toxicology, and mutagenesis, geochemistry and petrology, biomedical engineering, and radiological and ultrasound technology.

Their work covers a range of topics including:

  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

Michael Komárek has contributed to numerous papers, several of which have gained notable citations. Significant recent publications include:

  • "Electroactive Fe-biochar for redox-related remediation of arsenic and chromium: Distinct redox nature with varying iron/carbon speciation" (2022) published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • "Machine learning exploration of the direct and indirect roles of Fe impregnation on Cr(VI) removal by engineered biochar" (2021) in the Chemical Engineering Journal
  • "A perspective on the recovery mechanisms of spent lithium iron phosphate cathode materials in different oxidation environments" (2022) in the Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • "Metal(loid) and isotopic tracing of Pb in soils, road and house dusts from the industrial area of Volos (central Greece)" (2020) in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Cadmium Isotope Fractionation during Complexation with Humic Acid" (2021) published in Environmental Science & Technology

Michael Komárek frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Pollution
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

They have collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including Vladislav Chrastný, Martina Vítková, Tomáš Cajthaml, Milan Sedlář, and Gildas Ratié, each contributing to multiple projects and publications.

Best Publications

  • Contamination of vineyard soils with fungicides: a review of environmental and toxicological aspects.

    Michael Komárek;Michael Komárek;Eva Čadková;Vladislav Chrastný;François Bordas

  • Lead isotopes in environmental sciences: a review.

    Michael Komárek;Vojtěch Ettler;Vladislav Chrastný;Martin Mihaljevič

  • Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides--a review.

    Michael Komárek;Aleš Vaněk;Vojtěch Ettler

  • Multifunctional iron-biochar composites for the removal of potentially toxic elements, inherent cations, and hetero-chloride from hydraulic fracturing wastewater.

    Yuqing Sun;Yuqing Sun;Iris K.M. Yu;Daniel C.W. Tsang;Xinde Cao

  • Exposure of engineered nanomaterials to plants: Insights into the physiological and biochemical responses-A review

    Nubia Zuverza-Mena;Domingo Martínez-Fernández;Wenchao Du;Jose A. Hernandez-Viezcas

  • Lead and cadmium sorption mechanisms on magnetically modified biochars.

    Lukáš Trakal;Veronika Veselská;Ivo Šafařík;Martina Vítková

  • ICP-MS measurements of lead isotopic ratios in soils heavily contaminated by lead smelting: tracing the sources of pollution.

    Vojtěch Ettler;Martin Mihaljevič;Michael Komárek

  • Geochemical and spectroscopic investigations of Cd and Pb sorption mechanisms on contrasting biochars: Engineering implications

    Lukáš Trakal;Deniz Bingöl;Michael Pohořelý;Miroslav Hruška

  • Root water transport of Helianthus annuus L. under iron oxide nanoparticle exposure

    Domingo Martínez-Fernández;Didac Barroso;Michael Komárek

  • The use of maize and poplar in chelant-enhanced phytoextraction of lead from contaminated agricultural soils.

    Michael Komárek;Pavel Tlustoš;Jiřina Száková;Vladislav Chrastný

  • Phytoextraction of Pb and Cd from a contaminated agricultural soil using different EDTA application regimes: Laboratory versus field scale measures of efficiency

    Reinhard W. Neugschwandtner;Pavel Tlustoš;Michael Komárek;Jiřina Száková

  • Copper removal from aqueous solution using biochar: Effect of chemical activation

    Lukáš Trakal;Roman Šigut;Hana Šillerová;Dagmara Faturíková

  • Adsorption of copper, cadmium, lead and zinc onto a synthetic manganese oxide.

    Loïc Della Puppa;Loïc Della Puppa;Michael Komárek;François Bordas;Jean-Claude Bollinger

  • Effect of nano zero-valent iron application on As, Cd, Pb, and Zn availability in the rhizosphere of metal(loid) contaminated soils.

    Martina Vítková;Markus Puschenreiter;Michael Komárek

  • Mobility of lead, zinc and cadmium in alluvial soils heavily polluted by smelting industry

    A. Vanek;L. Boruvka;O. Drabek;M. Mihaljevic

  • Copper contamination of vineyard soils from small wine producers: A case study from the Czech Republic

    Michael Komárek;Jiřina Száková;Marcela Rohošková;Hana Javorská

  • Geochemical position of Pb, Zn and Cd in soils near the Olkusz mine/smelter, South Poland: effects of land use, type of contamination and distance from pollution source

    Vladislav Chrastný;Aleš Vaněk;Leslaw Teper;Jerzy Cabala

  • Competitive Adsorption of Cd(II), Cr(VI), and Pb(II) onto Nanomaghemite: A Spectroscopic and Modeling Approach

    Michael Komárek;Carla M. Koretsky;Krishna J. Stephen;Daniel S. Alessi

  • Metal(loid)s behaviour in soils amended with nano zero-valent iron as a function of pH and time

    Martina Vítková;Simona Rákosová;Zuzana Michálková;Michael Komárek

  • Metal/metalloid contamination and isotopic composition of lead in edible mushrooms and forest soils originating from a smelting area

    Michael Komárek;Vladislav Chrastný;Jana Štíchová

  • In situ chemical stabilization of trace element-contaminated soil – Field demonstrations and barriers to transition from laboratory to the field – A review

    Jurate Kumpiene;Juan Antelo;Evelina Brännvall;Ivan Carabante

Frequent Co-Authors

Vladislav Chrastný
Vladislav Chrastný Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Aleš Vaněk
Aleš Vaněk Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Jiřina Száková
Jiřina Száková Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Martin Mihaljevič
Martin Mihaljevič Charles University
Vojtěch Ettler
Vojtěch Ettler Charles University
Pavel Tlustoš
Pavel Tlustoš Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Vít Penížek
Vít Penížek Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Tomáš Grygar
Tomáš Grygar Czech Academy of Sciences
Daniel S. Alessi
Daniel S. Alessi University of Alberta
Tomáš Hájek
Tomáš Hájek University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance interdisciplinary knowledge. Programs like the best online MPA programs provide valuable training in public administration, crucial for those aiming to influence environmental policy and governance.

Similarly, an online bachelors in sociology can offer insights into human behavior and social systems, which are essential for addressing community impacts of environmental challenges.

For professionals seeking advanced qualifications, flexible options like online doctoral programs without dissertation enable the pursuit of a doctorate without the traditional dissertation, accommodating busy schedules and diverse career goals.

Moreover, educators aiming to elevate their credentials can consider the pathway from online EdS to EdD bridge program, which provides a streamlined transition from specialist degrees to doctoral-level expertise. These options collectively support a range of career trajectories tied to environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Komárek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles