World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7713 7411 25 24 100 6504

Vladislav Chrastný publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vladislav Chrastný between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vladislav Chrastný published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2025. 17 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2025. 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vladislav Chrastný: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 5
2007 4
2008 6
2009 7
2010 6
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 7
2015 8
2016 6
2017 7
2018 7
2019 5
2020 4
2021 6
2022 9
2023 7
2024 9
2025 16
2026 1
Total 131
Download as CSV

Vladislav Chrastný publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vladislav Chrastný sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 100 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 100
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Vladislav Chrastný D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vladislav Chrastný sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Vladislav Chrastný is affiliated with the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague in the Czech Republic. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Environmental Science, with a significant focus on pollution, health toxicology and mutagenesis, radiological and ultrasound technology, geochemistry and petrology, as well as water science and technology.

The main topics covered in Vladislav Chrastný's work include:

  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing

The scientist has contributed to numerous publications, often collaborating with frequent co-authors such as Michael Komárek, Adéla Šípková, František Veselovský, Martin Novák, and Ondřej Šebek.

Vladislav Chrastný's research has been published in several recurring venues, including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Environmental Pollution
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science & Technology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Vladislav Chrastný are:

  • Metal(loid) and isotopic tracing of Pb in soils, road and house dusts from the industrial area of Volos (central Greece), 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Cadmium Isotope Fractionation during Complexation with Humic Acid, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Metal isotope complexation with environmentally relevant surfaces: Opening the isotope fractionation black box, 2021, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
  • Multiple pollution sources unravelled by environmental forensics techniques and multivariate statistics, 2021, Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Tracing the sources of bioaccessible metal(loid)s in urban environments: A multidisciplinary approach, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment

Best Publications

  • Contamination of vineyard soils with fungicides: a review of environmental and toxicological aspects.

    Michael Komárek;Michael Komárek;Eva Čadková;Vladislav Chrastný;François Bordas

  • Lead isotopes in environmental sciences: a review.

    Michael Komárek;Vojtěch Ettler;Vladislav Chrastný;Martin Mihaljevič

  • The use of maize and poplar in chelant-enhanced phytoextraction of lead from contaminated agricultural soils.

    Michael Komárek;Pavel Tlustoš;Jiřina Száková;Vladislav Chrastný

  • Chromium isotope variations (δ53/52Cr) in mantle-derived sources and their weathering products: Implications for environmental studies and the evolution of δ53/52Cr in the Earth’s mantle over geologic time

    Juraj Farkaš;Vladislav Chrastný;Martin Novák;Eva Čadkova

  • Trace metals in Phragmites australis and Phalaris arundinacea growing in constructed and natural wetlands

    Jan Vymazal;Jaroslav Švehla;Lenka Kröpfelová;Vladislav Chrastný

  • Copper contamination of vineyard soils from small wine producers: A case study from the Czech Republic

    Michael Komárek;Jiřina Száková;Marcela Rohošková;Hana Javorská

  • Trace elements in Phragmites australis growing in constructed wetlands for treatment of municipal wastewater

    Jan Vymazal;Lenka Kröpfelová;Jaroslav Švehla;Vladislav Chrastný

  • Geochemical position of Pb, Zn and Cd in soils near the Olkusz mine/smelter, South Poland: effects of land use, type of contamination and distance from pollution source

    Vladislav Chrastný;Aleš Vaněk;Leslaw Teper;Jerzy Cabala

  • Competitive Adsorption of Cd(II), Cr(VI), and Pb(II) onto Nanomaghemite: A Spectroscopic and Modeling Approach

    Michael Komárek;Carla M. Koretsky;Krishna J. Stephen;Daniel S. Alessi

  • Metal/metalloid contamination and isotopic composition of lead in edible mushrooms and forest soils originating from a smelting area

    Michael Komárek;Vladislav Chrastný;Jana Štíchová

  • The use of poplar during a two-year induced phytoextraction of metals from contaminated agricultural soils

    Michael Komárek;Pavel Tlustoš;Jiřina Száková;Vladislav Chrastný

  • Effect of illite and birnessite on thallium retention and bioavailability in contaminated soils

    Aleš Vaněk;Michael Komárek;Petra Vokurková;Martin Mihaljevič

  • Cadmium isotope fractionation within the soil profile complicates source identification in relation to Pb–Zn mining and smelting processes

    Vladislav Chrastný;Eva Čadková;Aleš Vaněk;Leslaw Teper

  • Lithogenic thallium behavior in soils with different land use

    Aleš Vaněk;Vladislav Chrastný;Martin Mihaljevič;Petr Drahota

  • Cadmium isotope fractionation of materials derived from various industrial processes.

    Eva Martinková;Vladislav Chrastný;Michaela Francová;Adéla Šípková

  • Thallium isotopes in metallurgical wastes/contaminated soils: A novel tool to trace metal source and behavior

    Aleš Vaněk;Zuzana Grösslová;Martin Mihaljevič;Vojtěch Ettler

  • Geochemical position of thallium in soils from a smelter-impacted area

    Aleš Vaněk;Vladislav Chrastný;Michael Komárek;Vít Penížek

  • Thallium uptake by white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) grown on moderately contaminated soils—Agro-environmental implications

    Aleš Vaněk;Michael Komárek;Vladislav Chrastný;David Bečka

  • Evaluating the suitability of different environmental samples for tracing atmospheric pollution in industrial areas.

    Anna Francová;Vladislav Chrastný;Hana Šillerová;Martina Vítková

  • Lead isotopic signatures of wine and vineyard soils—tracers of lead origin

    Martin Mihaljevič;Vojtěch Ettler;Ondřej Šebek;Ladislav Strnad

  • Retention of copper originating from different fungicides in contrasting soil types.

    Michael Komárek;Ales Vanek;Vladislav Chrastný;Jirina Száková

  • Revisiting models of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn adsorption onto Fe(III) oxides

    Michael Komárek;Juan Antelo;Marie Králová;Veronika Veselská

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Komárek
Michael Komárek Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Aleš Vaněk
Aleš Vaněk Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Martin Mihaljevič
Martin Mihaljevič Charles University
Vojtěch Ettler
Vojtěch Ettler Charles University
Vít Penížek
Vít Penížek Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Jiřina Száková
Jiřina Száková Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Pavel Tlustoš
Pavel Tlustoš Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Tomáš Grygar
Tomáš Grygar Czech Academy of Sciences
Jan Vymazal
Jan Vymazal Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Tomáš Hájek
Tomáš Hájek University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences can lead to various interdisciplinary studies and career options. For those interested in flexibility and affordability, pursuing an online general studies degree affordable option offers a broad foundation while minimizing costs. Such programs often provide the flexibility needed for working professionals or students balancing other commitments.

For individuals seeking a more focused path, degrees in Geoscience and Geology are highly relevant. Many institutions now offer online geology programs that prepare students for careers involving earth systems, natural resource management, and environmental consulting.

Similarly, the rise of technology-driven environmental analysis highlights Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as a critical skill. Pursuing a gis degree online equips students with spatial data skills applicable in urban planning, conservation, and disaster management.

For those concerned about workload and academic challenge, researching what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify programs that match personal learning styles and career goals while maintaining engagement with environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Vladislav Chrastný

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles