World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 31 3592 3272 1904 1678 111 4263

Jacob Ricker-Gilbert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jacob Ricker-Gilbert between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jacob Ricker-Gilbert published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 16 of the 136 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 8 publications
2008 2025

136 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jacob Ricker-Gilbert: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 2
2010 3
2011 3
2012 3
2013 13
2014 13
2015 7
2016 13
2017 7
2018 10
2019 10
2020 5
2021 16
2022 8
2023 5
2024 8
2025 8
Total 136
Download as CSV

Jacob Ricker-Gilbert publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Ricker-Gilbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 107–111 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 111 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96 111
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Jacob Ricker-Gilbert D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Ricker-Gilbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147 31
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jacob Ricker-Gilbert is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with 48 publications contributing to this area. Key subfields include General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science, Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, and Food Science.

Their work covers several main topics, highlighting areas such as Agricultural Innovations and Practices, Agricultural Risk and Resilience, Land Rights and Reforms, Microfinance and Financial Inclusion, Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development, Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability, and Economic and Environmental Valuation.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Jonathan Bauchet, Jordan Chamberlin, Tahirou Abdoulaye, Diamilatou Kane, and Hugo De Groote. This collaboration reflects a network of researchers focused on agricultural economics and development.

Jacob Ricker-Gilbert's recent academic papers encompass:

  • "Rising land commodification in sub-Saharan Africa: Reconciling the diverse narratives," 2021, Global Food Security
  • "Improved Drying and Storage Practices that Reduce Aflatoxins in Stored Maize: Experimental Evidence from Smallholders in Senegal," 2020, American Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • "Economics of open-air sun drying in the maize value chain of Kenya," 2021, Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
  • "Overcoming smallholder farmers' post-harvest constraints through harvest loans and storage technology: Insights from a randomized controlled trial in Tanzania," 2022, Journal of Development Economics
  • "Does subsidizing legume seeds improve farm productivity and nutrition in Malawi?," 2022, Food Policy

The most frequent venues for publishing their work are AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA), SSRN Electronic Journal, Food Policy, and American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

Jacob Ricker-Gilbert is also an author of a book titled Profitability of Fertilizer Use in SSA: Evidence from Malawi, published in 2024 by Washington, DC: World Bank eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Subsidies and Crowding Out: A Double-Hurdle Model of Fertilizer Demand in Malawi

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Thomas S. Jayne;Ephraim Chirwa

  • Impact of Improved Maize Adoption on Welfare of Farm Households in Malawi: A Panel Data Analysis

    Sosina Bezu;Girma T. Kassie;Bekele Shiferaw;Jacob Ricker-Gilbert

  • What are the farm-level impacts of Malawi's farm input subsidy program? A critical review

    Rodney Lunduka;Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Monica Fisher

  • How does population density influence agricultural intensification and productivity? Evidence from Malawi

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Charles Jumbe;Jordan Chamberlin

  • Disrupting Demand for Commercial Seed: Input Subsidies in Malawi and Zambia

    Nicole M. Mason;Jacob Ricker-Gilbert

  • Participation in Rural Land Rental Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa: Who Benefits and by How Much? Evidence from Malawi and Zambia

    Jordan Chamberlin;Jacob Ricker-Gilbert

  • How do fertilizer subsidy programs affect total fertilizer use in sub‐Saharan Africa? Crowding out, diversion, and benefit/cost assessments

    T.S. Jayne;David Mather;Nicole Mason;Jacob Ricker-Gilbert

  • Productivity and Welfare Effects of Nigeria's e-Voucher-Based Input Subsidy Program

    Tesfamicheal Wossen;Tahirou Abdoulaye;Arega Alene;Shiferaw Feleke

  • How Does Population Density Influence Agricultural Intensification and Productivity

    A.L. Josephson;J. Ricker-Gilbert;R.J.G.M. Florax

  • Addressing the “Wicked Problem” of Input Subsidy Programs in Africa

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Thomas Jayne;Gerald Shively

  • What are the effects of input subsidy programs on maize prices? Evidence from Malawi and Zambia

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Nicole M. Mason;Francis A. Darko;Solomon T. Tembo

  • Subsidies for Agricultural Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment with Improved Grain Storage Bags in Uganda.

    Oluwatoba J. Omotilewa;Jacob Ricker‐Gilbert;John Herbert Ainembabazi

  • Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Integrated Pest Management Extension Methods: An Example from Bangladesh

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;George W. Norton;Jeffrey Alwang;Monayem Miah

  • Do Fertilizer Subsidies Boost Staple Crop Production and Reduce Poverty Across the Distribution of Smallholders in Africa? Quantile Regression Results from Malawi

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Thomas Jayne

  • Estimating the Enduring Effects of Fertiliser Subsidies on Commercial Fertiliser Demand and Maize Production: Panel Data Evidence from Malawi.

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;T.S. Jayne

  • Does storage technology affect adoption of improved maize varieties in Africa? Insights from Malawi’s input subsidy program

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Michael Jones

  • Malawi's Maize Marketing System

    Thomas S. Jayne;Nicholas J. Sitko;Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Julius H. Mangisoni

  • Does improved storage technology promote modern input use and food security? Evidence from a randomized trial in Uganda

    Oluwatoba J. Omotilewa;Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;John Herbert Ainembabazi;Gerald E. Shively

  • Maize yield response to nitrogen in Malawi' s smallholder production systems

    Sieg Snapp;T.S. Jayne;Wezi Mhango;Jacob Ricker-Gilbert

  • Wage and employment effects of Malawi's fertilizer subsidy program

    Jacob Ricker‐Gilbert

  • Submitted Article Addressing the "Wicked Problem" of Input Subsidy Programs in Africa

    Jacob Ricker-Gilbert;Thomas Jayne;Gerald Shively

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas S. Jayne
Thomas S. Jayne Michigan State University
Gerald Shively
Gerald Shively Purdue University West Lafayette
Raymond J.G.M. Florax
Raymond J.G.M. Florax Purdue University West Lafayette
Derek Headey
Derek Headey International Food Policy Research Institute
Bekele Shiferaw
Bekele Shiferaw World Bank Group
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
Jeffrey Alwang
Jeffrey Alwang Virginia Tech
Gershon Feder
Gershon Feder International Food Policy Research Institute
Stein T. Holden
Stein T. Holden Norwegian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Economics and Finance opens doors to a range of dynamic online degrees and career pathways. Many students choose to further specialize to gain a competitive edge in today’s data-driven market. A masters in data analytics online provides valuable skills in big data, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling—assets highly sought-after in finance and business sectors.

Leadership skills are also in demand. Earning a masters in organizational development prepares graduates to manage teams, drive innovation, and lead change in complex organizations. Similarly, a master business intelligence equips you with expertise in transforming raw data into actionable strategies—a crucial skill for financial analysts and consultants.

For those seeking a broader business foundation, an online mba offers flexibility and wide applicability across various sectors, often without the need for standardized test scores. Exploring these options can help you align your education with your ideal career, whether in financial analysis, consulting, or data-driven decision making.

Best Scientists Citing Jacob Ricker-Gilbert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles