World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 52 1237 746 212 15960

Raymond J.G.M. Florax publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raymond J.G.M. Florax between 1990 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raymond J.G.M. Florax published across 32 years, from 1990 to 2021, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2004. 2 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2004. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications
1990 2021

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raymond J.G.M. Florax: publications per year, 1990 to 2021
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 2
1992 6
1993 0
1994 1
1995 4
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 7
2002 13
2003 17
2004 21
2005 9
2006 14
2007 9
2008 11
2009 14
2010 12
2011 16
2012 9
2013 9
2014 11
2015 7
2016 3
2017 5
2018 4
2019 6
2020 0
2021 2
Total 219
Download as CSV

Raymond J.G.M. Florax publications per year - data summary

  • Raymond J.G.M. Florax, a Economics and Finance scholar from Purdue University West Lafayette, has 219 publications recorded across 32 years, from 1990 to 2021.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2021.
  • The most productive year is 2004, with 21 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 1996, 1998 and 1999, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 32 years in the span carry no publications at all (1993, 1997 and 2020).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.6 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2017-2021) hold 17 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2000: 20 publications (1.8 per year); 2001-2011: 143 publications (13.0 per year); 2012-2021: 56 publications (5.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Raymond J.G.M. Florax publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond J.G.M. Florax sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 212–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 212 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44 212
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Raymond J.G.M. Florax publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Raymond J.G.M. Florax, a Economics and Finance scholar from Purdue University West Lafayette, records 212 publications - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Raymond J.G.M. Florax, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Raymond J.G.M. Florax ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Raymond J.G.M. Florax D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond J.G.M. Florax sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69 52
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Raymond J.G.M. Florax D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Raymond J.G.M. Florax, a Economics and Finance scholar from Purdue University West Lafayette, records 52 D-Index - the 68th percentile of the discipline.
  • 68% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Raymond J.G.M. Florax, and about 32% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Raymond J.G.M. Florax ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Raymond J.G.M. Florax was affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research spanned diverse areas within economics and social sciences, with a focus on regional economics, spatial analysis, and related fields.

The scientist published extensively in topics that included:

  • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
  • Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Regional Development and Policy
  • Migration and Labor Dynamics

Their main fields of study were economics, econometrics, and finance, supplemented by contributions to social sciences. Their subfields included economics and econometrics, political science and international relations, environmental engineering, and sociology and political science.

Florax's recent published papers covered various empirical and theoretical issues in economics and regional studies. Selected works include:

  • "Transportation costs: Mississippi River barge rates," 2020, Journal of commodity markets
  • "Technological leadership and sectorial employment growth: A spatial econometric analysis for U.S. counties," 2020, Economic Notes
  • "Living apart together: The economic value of ethnic diversity in cities," 2022, Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
  • "Does decentralization of governance promote urban diversity? Evidence from Spain," 2021, Regional Studies

Frequent co-authors who collaborated with Florax included:

  • Peter Mulder
  • Brian Wetzstein
  • Kenneth A. Foster
  • James K. Binkley
  • Valerien O. Pede

Their research was published across notable journals such as:

  • Journal of commodity markets
  • Economic Notes
  • Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
  • Regional Studies

Best Publications

  • Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence

    Luc Anselin;Anil K. Bera;Raymond Florax;Mann J. Yoon

  • The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature

    Luke M. Brander;Raymond J. G. M. Florax;Jan E. Vermaat

  • Price and Income Elasticities of Residential Water Demand: A Meta-Analysis

    Jasper M. Dalhuisen;Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Henri L.F.M. de Groot;Peter Nijkamp

  • Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications

    R.J.G.M. Florax;L. Anselin;S.J. Rey

  • New Directions in Spatial Econometrics

    Luc Anselin;Raymond J. G. M. Florax

  • Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results

    Luc Anselin;Raymond J. G. M. Florax

  • Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology

    Raymond J.G.M Florax;Hendrik Folmer;Sergio J Rey;Sergio J Rey

  • Space and Growth: A Survey of Empirical Evidence and Methods

    Maria Abreu;Henri L. F. de Groot;Henri L. F. de Groot;Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Raymond J.G.M. Florax

  • The University: A Regional Booster? Economic Impacts of Academic Knowledge Infrastructure

    R. J. G. M. Florax

  • Advances in Spatial Econometrics

    Luc Anselin;Raymond J. G. M. Florax;Sergio J. Rey

  • The value of statistical life in road safety: a meta-analysis.

    Arianne de Blaeij;Raymond J.G.M Florax;Piet Rietveld;Erik Verhoef

  • Specification and estimation of spatial linear regression models, Monte Carlo evaluation of pre-test estimators.

    Raymond Florax;Henk Folmer

  • A Meta-Analysis of Beta-Convergence: The Legendary Two-Percent

    Maria Abreu;Henri L.F. de Groot;Raymond J.G.M. Florax

  • Capital-Energy Substitution and Shifts in Factor Demand: A Meta-Analysis

    Mark J. Koetse;Henri L.F. de Groot;Raymond J.G.M. Florax

  • A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship between Income Inequality and Economic Growth

    Laura De Dominicis;Raymond J. G. M. Florax;Henri L. F. De Groot

  • Flooding risk and housing values: an economic assessment of environmental hazard

    Vanessa E. Daniel;Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Piet Rietveld;Piet Rietveld

  • Determinants of the Regional Demand for Higher Education in The Netherlands: A Gravity Model Approach

    Carla Angélica da Silva Pinto de Sá;Raymond Florax;Piet Rietveld

  • The Impacts of Misspecified Spatial Interaction in Linear Regression Models

    Raymond J. G. M. Florax;Serge Rey

  • A meta-analysis of the willingness to pay for reductions in pesticide risk exposure

    Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Chiara M. Travisi;Peter Nijkamp

  • Difference-in-differences techniques for spatial data: Local autocorrelation and spatial interaction ☆

    Michael S. Delgado;Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Raymond J.G.M. Florax

  • Price and income elasticities of residential water demand: A meta-analysis

    J.M. Dalhuisen;R.J.G.M. Florax;H.L.F. de Groot;P. Nijkamp

Frequent Co-Authors

Henri L.F. de Groot
Henri L.F. de Groot Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peter Nijkamp
Peter Nijkamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Piet Rietveld
Piet Rietveld Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dayton M. Lambert
Dayton M. Lambert Oklahoma State University
Luc Anselin
Luc Anselin University of Chicago
William A. Masters
William A. Masters Tufts University
Jacob Ricker-Gilbert
Jacob Ricker-Gilbert Purdue University West Lafayette
Piet Rietveld
Piet Rietveld Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jacques Poot
Jacques Poot University of Waikato
Reinout Heijungs
Reinout Heijungs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Economics and Finance in the USA opens up diverse career options, and online education is making these paths even more accessible. Students looking to specialize further often consider advanced degrees that complement their finance or economics background.

A popular choice is data analytics masters programs online. These programs equip graduates with analytical and quantitative skills highly valued in banking, consulting, and financial services. If your interests lean towards management, you might explore the best online master's in organizational leadership, which is ideal for aspiring financial leaders and executives.

For those wanting to harness the power of data-driven decision-making, a master business intelligence degree provides expertise in big data analysis—skills that are in high demand across all major economic sectors.

Finally, candidates aiming for broad business leadership roles often choose an online mba without gmat, which offers flexibility and removes barriers to entry for professionals balancing work and study. Each of these online options can accelerate your career and expand your professional horizons in Economics and Finance.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond J.G.M. Florax