World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
35
Citations
5796
World Ranking
2942
National Ranking
1629

Dayton M. Lambert publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dayton M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 261 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Dayton M. Lambert D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dayton M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dayton M. Lambert is affiliated with Oklahoma State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, as well as Economics, Econometrics and Finance. With a focus on various subfields, their work includes Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The main topics Dayton M. Lambert explores include:

  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Agricultural Economics and Policy

Dayton M. Lambert has published research in several academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Agribusiness
  • Precision Agriculture

Their recent scholarly papers include:

  • Consumer preferences for eco-friendly attributes in disposable dinnerware, 2020, Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • Conservation agriculture as a climate change mitigation strategy in Zimbabwe, 2020, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
  • Inattention, availability bias, and attribute premium estimation for a biobased product, 2021, Agricultural Economics
  • Consumer willingness-to-pay for a resilient electrical grid, 2024, Energy Economics
  • Geographically weighted regression estimation of the linear response and plateau function, 2021, Precision Agriculture

Frequent collaborators in Dayton M. Lambert's research career include:

  • Lixia H. Lambert
  • Christopher D. Clark
  • Kimberly L. Jensen
  • Burton C. English
  • Christopher N. Boyer

Best Publications

  • Cowpea supply and demand in West and Central Africa

    A.S. Langyintuo;J. Lowenberg-DeBoer;M. Faye;D. Lambert

  • The rural growth trifecta: outdoor amenities, creative class and entrepreneurial context

    David A. McGranahan;Timothy R. Wojan;Dayton M. Lambert

  • AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS REVIEW

    Thomas G. Johnson;Ann Markusen;Seong-Hoon Cho;Seung Gyu Kim

  • Emoting with their feet: Bohemian attraction to creative milieu

    Timothy R. Wojan;Dayton M. Lambert;David A. McGranahan

  • Do Regional Trade Agreements Increase Members' Agricultural Trade?

    Jason H. Grant;Dayton M. Lambert

  • Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices

    Dayton M. Lambert;Patrick Sullivan;Roger Claassen;Linda Foreman

  • Conservation-Compatible Practices and Programs: Who Participates?

    Dayton M. Lambert;Patrick Sullivan;Roger Claassen;Linda F. Foreman

  • Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality

    Amos Robert Ngwira;Christian Thierfelder;Dayton M. Lambert

  • A two-step estimator for a spatial lag model of counts: Theory, small sample performance and an application☆

    Dayton M. Lambert;Jason P. Brown;Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Raymond J.G.M. Florax

  • ADOPTION, PROFITABILITY, AND MAKING BETTER USE OF PRECISION FARMING DATA

    Dayton M. Lambert;James Lowenberg-DeBoer;Terry W. Griffin;J. Peone

  • Adoption and Abandonment of Precision Soil Sampling in Cotton Production

    Jonathan C. Walton;Dayton M. Lambert;Roland K. Roberts;James A. Larson

  • Intensity of Precision Agriculture Technology Adoption by Cotton Producers

    Kenneth W. Paxton;Ashok K. Mishra;Sachin Chintawar;Roland K. Roberts

  • Bundled Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies by Cotton Producers

    Dayton M. Lambert;Krishna P. Paudel;James A. Larson

  • Economic Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Patterns in Corn and Soybean Response to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

    D. M. Lambert;J. Lowenberg-DeBoer;G. L. Malzer

  • Estimating spatially varying effects of urban growth boundaries on land development and land value

    Seong-Hoon Cho;Neelam Poudyal;Dayton M. Lambert

  • Economic Analysis of Row Spacing for Corn and Soybean

    Dayton M. Lambert;Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer

  • A Comparison of Four Spatial Regression Models for Yield Monitor Data: A Case Study from Argentina

    Dayton M. Lambert;James Lowenberg-Deboer;Rodolfo Bongiovanni

  • Timing of precision agriculture technology adoption in US cotton production

    Pattarawan Watcharaanantapong;Roland K. Roberts;Dayton M. Lambert;James A. Larson

  • Geographically weighted regression bandwidth selection and spatial autocorrelation: an empirical example using Chinese agriculture data

    Seong-Hoon Cho;Dayton M. Lambert;Zhuo Chen

  • Consumer willingness to pay for beef grown using climate friendly production practices

    Xiaogu Li;Kimberly L. Jensen;Christopher D. Clark;Dayton M. Lambert

  • Ethanol Plant Location Determinants and County Comparative Advantage

    Dayton M. Lambert;Michael D. Wilcox;Alicia English;Lance A. Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

Ashok K. Mishra
Ashok K. Mishra Arizona State University
Raymond J.G.M. Florax
Raymond J.G.M. Florax Purdue University West Lafayette
Christian Thierfelder
Christian Thierfelder International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Dermot J. Hayes
Dermot J. Hayes Iowa State University
Rex A. Dunham
Rex A. Dunham Auburn University
Zhanjiang Liu
Zhanjiang Liu Syracuse University
Donald D. Tyler
Donald D. Tyler University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Nacer Bellaloui
Nacer Bellaloui Agricultural Research Service
Alemu Mengistu
Alemu Mengistu Agricultural Research Service
William R. Raun
William R. Raun Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Economics and Finance can open up a diverse range of career opportunities. One popular option is enrolling in a fast track finance degree, allowing you to complete your studies quickly and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for motivated students eager to gain practical skills and accelerate their career progression.

Another route is pursuing accelerated mba programs. These intensive programs are designed for those seeking to build advanced business and management skills in a condensed timeframe, often leading to executive or leadership roles.

For those interested in accounting, earning credentials like a certified bookkeeper certificate can offer a quick pathway into entry-level finance jobs. This qualification is highly valued by employers looking for accuracy and reliability in their bookkeeping staff.

Additionally, an office administration course can provide foundational business knowledge, supporting roles in business operations and office management. These pathways cater to different ambitions and can be completed online, offering flexibility for students balancing other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Dayton M. Lambert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles