World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 35 2942 2664 1629 1431 261 5796

Dayton M. Lambert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dayton M. Lambert between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dayton M. Lambert published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2015. 19 of the 319 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2015. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 4 publications
1999 2025

319 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dayton M. Lambert: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 6
2004 5
2005 2
2006 8
2007 12
2008 15
2009 16
2010 20
2011 20
2012 17
2013 12
2014 20
2015 25
2016 25
2017 17
2018 13
2019 14
2020 15
2021 17
2022 7
2023 11
2024 15
2025 4
Total 319
Download as CSV

Dayton M. Lambert publications per year - data summary

  • Dayton M. Lambert, a Economics and Finance scholar from Oklahoma State University, has 319 publications recorded across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2015 and 2016, with 25 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1999, 2000 and 2001, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 27 years in the span carries no publications at all (2002).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.3 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 54 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2007: 36 publications (4.0 per year); 2008-2016: 170 publications (18.9 per year); 2017-2025: 113 publications (12.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Dayton M. Lambert publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dayton M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 257–261 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 261 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33 261
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Dayton M. Lambert publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Dayton M. Lambert, a Economics and Finance scholar from Oklahoma State University, records 261 publications - the 77th percentile of the discipline.
  • 77% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Dayton M. Lambert, and about 23% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Dayton M. Lambert ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Dayton M. Lambert D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dayton M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141 35
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Dayton M. Lambert D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Dayton M. Lambert, a Economics and Finance scholar from Oklahoma State University, records 35 D-Index - the 24th percentile of the discipline.
  • 24% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Dayton M. Lambert, and about 76% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Dayton M. Lambert ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Dayton M. Lambert is affiliated with Oklahoma State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, as well as Economics, Econometrics and Finance. With a focus on various subfields, their work includes Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The main topics Dayton M. Lambert explores include:

  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Agricultural Economics and Policy

Dayton M. Lambert has published research in several academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Agribusiness
  • Precision Agriculture

Their recent scholarly papers include:

  • Consumer preferences for eco-friendly attributes in disposable dinnerware, 2020, Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • Conservation agriculture as a climate change mitigation strategy in Zimbabwe, 2020, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
  • Inattention, availability bias, and attribute premium estimation for a biobased product, 2021, Agricultural Economics
  • Consumer willingness-to-pay for a resilient electrical grid, 2024, Energy Economics
  • Geographically weighted regression estimation of the linear response and plateau function, 2021, Precision Agriculture

Frequent collaborators in Dayton M. Lambert's research career include:

  • Lixia H. Lambert
  • Christopher D. Clark
  • Kimberly L. Jensen
  • Burton C. English
  • Christopher N. Boyer

Best Publications

  • Cowpea supply and demand in West and Central Africa

    A.S. Langyintuo;J. Lowenberg-DeBoer;M. Faye;D. Lambert

  • The rural growth trifecta: outdoor amenities, creative class and entrepreneurial context

    David A. McGranahan;Timothy R. Wojan;Dayton M. Lambert

  • AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS REVIEW

    Thomas G. Johnson;Ann Markusen;Seong-Hoon Cho;Seung Gyu Kim

  • Emoting with their feet: Bohemian attraction to creative milieu

    Timothy R. Wojan;Dayton M. Lambert;David A. McGranahan

  • Do Regional Trade Agreements Increase Members' Agricultural Trade?

    Jason H. Grant;Dayton M. Lambert

  • Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices

    Dayton M. Lambert;Patrick Sullivan;Roger Claassen;Linda Foreman

  • Conservation-Compatible Practices and Programs: Who Participates?

    Dayton M. Lambert;Patrick Sullivan;Roger Claassen;Linda F. Foreman

  • Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality

    Amos Robert Ngwira;Christian Thierfelder;Dayton M. Lambert

  • A two-step estimator for a spatial lag model of counts: Theory, small sample performance and an application☆

    Dayton M. Lambert;Jason P. Brown;Raymond J.G.M. Florax;Raymond J.G.M. Florax

  • ADOPTION, PROFITABILITY, AND MAKING BETTER USE OF PRECISION FARMING DATA

    Dayton M. Lambert;James Lowenberg-DeBoer;Terry W. Griffin;J. Peone

  • Adoption and Abandonment of Precision Soil Sampling in Cotton Production

    Jonathan C. Walton;Dayton M. Lambert;Roland K. Roberts;James A. Larson

  • Intensity of Precision Agriculture Technology Adoption by Cotton Producers

    Kenneth W. Paxton;Ashok K. Mishra;Sachin Chintawar;Roland K. Roberts

  • Bundled Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies by Cotton Producers

    Dayton M. Lambert;Krishna P. Paudel;James A. Larson

  • Economic Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Patterns in Corn and Soybean Response to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

    D. M. Lambert;J. Lowenberg-DeBoer;G. L. Malzer

  • Estimating spatially varying effects of urban growth boundaries on land development and land value

    Seong-Hoon Cho;Neelam Poudyal;Dayton M. Lambert

  • Economic Analysis of Row Spacing for Corn and Soybean

    Dayton M. Lambert;Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer

  • A Comparison of Four Spatial Regression Models for Yield Monitor Data: A Case Study from Argentina

    Dayton M. Lambert;James Lowenberg-Deboer;Rodolfo Bongiovanni

  • Timing of precision agriculture technology adoption in US cotton production

    Pattarawan Watcharaanantapong;Roland K. Roberts;Dayton M. Lambert;James A. Larson

  • Geographically weighted regression bandwidth selection and spatial autocorrelation: an empirical example using Chinese agriculture data

    Seong-Hoon Cho;Dayton M. Lambert;Zhuo Chen

  • Consumer willingness to pay for beef grown using climate friendly production practices

    Xiaogu Li;Kimberly L. Jensen;Christopher D. Clark;Dayton M. Lambert

  • Ethanol Plant Location Determinants and County Comparative Advantage

    Dayton M. Lambert;Michael D. Wilcox;Alicia English;Lance A. Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

Ashok K. Mishra
Ashok K. Mishra Arizona State University
Raymond J.G.M. Florax
Raymond J.G.M. Florax Purdue University West Lafayette
Christian Thierfelder
Christian Thierfelder International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Rex A. Dunham
Rex A. Dunham Auburn University
Dermot J. Hayes
Dermot J. Hayes Iowa State University
Zhanjiang Liu
Zhanjiang Liu Syracuse University
Donald D. Tyler
Donald D. Tyler University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Paul R. Armsworth
Paul R. Armsworth University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Nacer Bellaloui
Nacer Bellaloui Agricultural Research Service
Alemu Mengistu
Alemu Mengistu Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Economics and Finance can open up a diverse range of career opportunities. One popular option is enrolling in a fast track finance degree, allowing you to complete your studies quickly and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for motivated students eager to gain practical skills and accelerate their career progression.

Another route is pursuing accelerated mba programs. These intensive programs are designed for those seeking to build advanced business and management skills in a condensed timeframe, often leading to executive or leadership roles.

For those interested in accounting, earning credentials like a certified bookkeeper certificate can offer a quick pathway into entry-level finance jobs. This qualification is highly valued by employers looking for accuracy and reliability in their bookkeeping staff.

Additionally, an office administration course can provide foundational business knowledge, supporting roles in business operations and office management. These pathways cater to different ambitions and can be completed online, offering flexibility for students balancing other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Dayton M. Lambert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles