World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
64
Citations
15735
World Ranking
418
National Ranking
222

Daniel A. Griffith publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel A. Griffith sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 325 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Daniel A. Griffith D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel A. Griffith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Social Sciences
  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)
  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2001 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Daniel A. Griffith is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with a strong emphasis on the subfield of Economics and Econometrics. Their work intersects several other subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Epidemiology, Environmental Engineering, and Statistics and Probability.

The scientist's major research topics encompass:

  • Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping

Daniel A. Griffith has authored multiple recent papers. Notable examples include:

  • "Interpreting Moran Eigenvector Maps with the Getis-Ord Gi* Statistic," 2021, published in The Professional Geographer
  • "Spatial-temporal modeling of initial COVID-19 diffusion: The cases of the Chinese Mainland and Conterminous United States," 2021, published in Geo-spatial Information Science
  • "Spatial autocorrelation informed approaches to solving location-allocation problems," 2022, published in Spatial Statistics

Several frequent coauthors have collaborated on their work, including Yongwan Chun, T.S. Fiez, A Greenberg, Ippei FUJIMORI, and Viviana De. The scientist's publications appear repeatedly in certain venues such as the IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Transactions in GIS, Stats, Spatial Statistics, and Geographical Analysis.

Daniel A. Griffith has received recognition through various fellowships, including:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada (2017), Academy of Social Sciences
  • Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) (2015)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2011)
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (2001)

Best Publications

  • Spatial Autocorrelation and Spatial Filtering: Gaining Understanding Through Theory and Scientific Visualization

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses.

    Daniel A. Griffith;Pedro R. Peres-Neto

  • DO SPATIAL EFFECFS REALLY MATTER IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS

    Luc Anselin;Daniel A. Griffith

  • Spatial Autocorrelation and Spatial Filtering

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • Comparative Spatial Filtering in Regression Analysis

    Arthur Getis;Daniel A. Griffith

  • Semiparametric Filtering of Spatial Autocorrelation: The Eigenvector Approach

    Michael Tiefelsdorf;Daniel A Griffith

  • A linear regression solution to the spatial autocorrelation problem

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • Spatial Autocorrelation: A Primer

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • Spatial-Filtering-Based Contributions to a Critique of Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR):

    Daniel A Griffith

  • SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION and EIGENFUNCTIONS OF THE GEOGRAPHIC WEIGHTS MATRIX ACCOMPANYING GEO‐REFERENCED DATA

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • Introduction: Spatial Econometrics

    Daniel A. Griffith;Jean H.P. Paelinck

  • Modelling urban population density in a multi-centered city.

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • A casebook for spatial statistical data analysis : a compilation of analyses of different thematic data sets

    Daniel A. Griffith;Larry J. Layne;J. K. Ord;Akio Sone

  • A Variance-Stabilizing Coding Scheme for Spatial Link Matrices:

    M Tiefelsdorf;D A Griffith;B Boots

  • MODELING SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION IN SPATIAL INTERACTION DATA: AN APPLICATION TO PATENT CITATION DATA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

    Manfred M. Fischer;Daniel A. Griffith

  • A generalized Huff model.

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • Advanced spatial statistics

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • EXPLORATIONS INTO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND SPATIAL INTERACTION

    D A Griffith;K G Jones

  • Effective Geographic Sample Size in the Presence of Spatial Autocorrelation

    Daniel A. Griffith

  • Statistical analysis for geographers

    Daniel A. Griffith;Carl G. Amrhein;Joseph R. Desloges

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Nijkamp
Peter Nijkamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Manfred M. Fischer
Manfred M. Fischer Vienna University of Economics and Business
Robert J. Bennett
Robert J. Bennett University of Cambridge
Thomas R. Unnasch
Thomas R. Unnasch University of South Florida
John I. Githure
John I. Githure International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology
David W. S. Wong
David W. S. Wong George Mason University
Luc Anselin
Luc Anselin University of Chicago
Eduardo Gotuzzo
Eduardo Gotuzzo Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt
James P. LeSage
James P. LeSage Texas State University
Yoshiki Yamagata
Yoshiki Yamagata Keio University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and career pathways that complement your skills. Many students pursue interdisciplinary fields such as data science and business analytics. For example, advanced programs in analytics can enhance your quantitative expertise—explore top analytics masters programs to find options tailored to your goals.

For those interested in leadership and management, online MBA programs offer flexible opportunities to combine mathematical skills with business acumen. Transfer students may find it helpful to know about the policies regarding can you transfer credits into an mba program, which can ease the transition and reduce time to graduation.

Additionally, if you're seeking more accessible options, identifying the easiest mba program to get into could be beneficial. These programs typically have more flexible admission criteria while maintaining quality education. Similarly, some students prioritize convenience and may look into the easiest mba program to fit their lifestyle without compromising career advancement.

Overall, combining a math background with relevant online degrees can accelerate your career in technology, finance, or analytics-driven industries, making your educational journey both versatile and rewarding.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel A. Griffith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles