World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
68
Citations
14742
World Ranking
2773
National Ranking
74

Paul Cumming publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Cumming sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 413 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul Cumming D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Cumming sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Cumming is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on medical imaging techniques and applications, with a significant emphasis on neuroscience and molecular biology within the broader field of medicine. The scientist has contributed extensively to studies related to Alzheimer's disease research, traumatic brain injury, neurovascular disturbances, and neuroinflammation mechanisms.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, their work delves into several subfields such as:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Themes frequently explored in their research consist of:

  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Paul Cumming has contributed papers to several key scientific journals. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Molecules
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • PubMed

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul Cumming are:

  • Molecular and Functional Imaging Studies of Psychedelic Drug Action in Animals and Humans, 2021, Molecules
  • First results on kinetic modelling and parametric imaging of dynamic 18F-FDG datasets from a long axial FOV PET scanner in oncological patients, 2022, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Feasibility of using abbreviated scan protocols with population-based input functions for accurate kinetic modeling of [18F]-FDG datasets from a long axial FOV PET scanner, 2022, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • A Review of Molecular Imaging of Glutamate Receptors, 2020, Molecules
  • Glial activation is moderated by sex in response to amyloidosis but not to tau pathology in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases, 2020, Journal of Neuroinflammation

Collaborations form a significant part of Paul Cumming's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Axel Rominger
  • Matthias Brendel
  • Leonie Beyer
  • Fatima Nasrallah
  • Florian Eckenweber

Best Publications

  • The use of pigs in neuroscience: modeling brain disorders.

    Nanna Marie Lind;Anette Moustgaard;Jacob Jelsing;Gabor Vajta

  • Elevated dopa decarboxylase activity in living brain of patients with psychosis

    J. Reith;C. Benkelfat;A. Sherwin;Y. Yasuhara

  • Correlation of alcohol craving with striatal dopamine synthesis capacity and D2/3 receptor availability: a combined [18F]DOPA and [18F]DMFP PET study in detoxified alcoholic patients.

    Andreas Heinz;Thomas Siessmeier;Jana Wrase;Hans Georg Buchholz

  • 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for the Early Prediction of Response to Somatostatin Receptor–Mediated Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors

    Alexander R. Haug;Christoph J. Auernhammer;Björn Wängler;Gerwin P. Schmidt

  • Meta-analysis of molecular imaging of serotonin transporters in major depression

    Gregor Gryglewski;Rupert Lanzenberger;Georg S Kranz;Paul Cumming

  • Dopamine in amygdala gates limbic processing of aversive stimuli in humans

    Thorsten Kienast;Ahmad R Hariri;Florian Schlagenhauf;Jana Wrase

  • Emerging PET Radiotracers and Targets for Imaging of Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Outlook Beyond TSPO.

    Vidya Narayanaswami;Vidya Narayanaswami;Kenneth Dahl;Kenneth Dahl;Vadim Bernard-Gauthier;Lee Josephson

  • MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET?

    Nathalie L. Jansen;Vera Graute;Lena Armbruster;Bogdana Suchorska

  • In Vivo Imaging of Macrophage Activity in the Coronary Arteries Using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT: Correlation with Coronary Calcium Burden and Risk Factors

    Axel Rominger;Tobias Saam;Eva Vogl;Christopher Übleis

  • Elevated [18F]fluorodopamine turnover in brain of patients with schizophrenia: an [18F]fluorodopa/positron emission tomography study.

    Yoshitaka Kumakura;Paul Cumming;Ingo Vernaleken;Hans-Georg Buchholz

  • Methylphenidate-evoked changes in striatal dopamine correlate with inattention and impulsivity in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ☆

    Pedro Rosa-Neto;Hans C. Lou;Paul Cumming;Ole Pryds

  • MR-based statistical atlas of the Göttingen minipig brain.

    Hideaki Watanabe;Flemming Andersen;Claus Z. Simonsen;Stephen M. Evans

  • Reduced dopamine D1 receptor binding in the ventral striatum of cigarette smokers.

    Alain Dagher;Catherine Bleicher;John A.D. Aston;John A.D. Aston;Roger N. Gunn;Roger N. Gunn

  • Inverted-U-shaped correlation between dopamine receptor availability in striatum and sensation seeking

    Albert Gjedde;Yoshitaka Kumakura;Yoshitaka Kumakura;Paul Cumming;Jakob Linnet

  • Human striatal L-DOPA decarboxylase activity estimated in vivo using 6-[18F]fluoro-DOPA and positron emission tomography : error analysis and application to normal subjects

    Hiroto Kuwabara;Paul Cumming;Jakob Reith;Gabriel Léger

  • PET Studies of Cerebral Levodopa Metabolism: A Review of Clinical Findings and Modeling Approaches

    Yoshitaka Kumakura;Paul Cumming

  • ADHD: increased dopamine receptor availability linked to attention deficit and low neonatal cerebral blood flow.

    Hans C Lou;Pedro Rosa;Ole Pryds;Hanne Karrebæk

  • Automated Classification and Removal of EEG Artifacts With SVM and Wavelet-ICA

    Chong Yeh Sai;Norrima Mokhtar;Hamzah Arof;Paul Cumming

  • Subchronic haloperidol downregulates dopamine synthesis capacity in the brain of schizophrenic patients in vivo.

    Gerhard Gründer;Ingo Vernaleken;Matthias J. Müller;Eugen Davids

  • Determination of plasma [18F]-6-fluorodopa during positron emission tomography: elimination and metabolism in carbidopa treated subjects.

    B.E. Boyes;P. Cumming;W.R.W. Martin;E.G. McGeer

  • The personality trait openness is related to cerebral 5-HTT levels.

    Jan Kalbitzer;Vibe G. Frokjaer;David Erritzoe;Claus Svarer

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert Gjedde
Albert Gjedde University of Copenhagen
Peter Bartenstein
Peter Bartenstein Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Matthias Brendel
Matthias Brendel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Hiroto Kuwabara
Hiroto Kuwabara Johns Hopkins University
Andreas Heinz
Andreas Heinz Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Christian Haass
Christian Haass Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Per Borghammer
Per Borghammer Aarhus University
Harald Steiner
Harald Steiner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Pedro Rosa-Neto
Pedro Rosa-Neto McGill University
Arne Møller
Arne Møller Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul Cumming

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles