World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
38215
World Ranking
15874
National Ranking
1462

Ann Bowling publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Bowling sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 290 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ann Bowling D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Bowling sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann Bowling is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, prominently focusing on medicine, economics, econometrics, and finance.

Their work often intersects subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, economics and econometrics, and epidemiology. This multidisciplinary approach supports a comprehensive understanding of health systems and economic evaluations within medical research.

Bowling's main research topics include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies

Among their recent scholarly contributions is the paper titled Disease severity accounts for minimal variance of quality of life in people with dementia and their carers: analyses of cross-sectional data from the MODEM study published in 2020 in BMC Geriatrics. This publication has been cited 24 times, indicating a level of engagement within the field.

Bowling frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Nicolas Farina
  • Derek King
  • Clare Burgon
  • Sharne Berwald
  • Elizabeth Bustard

Their published work is predominantly found in the journal BMC Geriatrics, with this venue accounting for their notable publications.

Best Publications

  • Research methods in health. Investigating health and health services

    A Bowling

  • Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality

    Ann Bowling

  • Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales

    A Bowling

  • Quality of life from the perspectives of older people

    Zahava Gabriel;Ann Bowling

  • Just one question: If one question works, why ask several?

    Ann Bowling

  • Measuring Disease: A Review of Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Scales

    Ann Bowling

  • Being alone in later life: loneliness, social isolation and living alone

    Christina Victor;Sasha Scambler;John Bond;Ann Bowling

  • What is successful ageing and who should define it

    Ann Bowling;Paul Dieppe

  • What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life

    Ann Bowling

  • The prevalence of and risk factors for, loneliness in later life: a survey of older people in Great Britain

    Christina R. Victor;Sasha J. Scambler;Ann Bowling;John Bond

  • Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension

    David Banister;Ann Bowling

  • Let's ask them: a national survey of definitions of quality of life and its enhancement among people aged 65 and over.

    Ann Bowling;Zahava Gabriel;Joanna Dykes;Lee Marriott Dowding

  • Ageing Well: Quality Of Life In Old Age

    Ann Bowling

  • A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age

    A. Bowling;D. Banister;S. Sutton;O. Evans

  • Handbook Of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement And Analysis

    Ann Bowling;Shah Ebrahim

  • Aspirations for older age in the 21st century: what is successful aging?

    Ann Bowling

  • The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: A review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations

    Ann Bowling;G. Rowe;N. Lambert;M. Waddington

  • Enhancing later life: How older people perceive active ageing?

    Ann Bowling

  • Exercise for reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community

    Denise Kendrick;Arun Kumar;Hannah Carpenter;G A Rixt Zijlstra

  • Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey

    Ann Bowling;Matthew Bond;Crispin Jenkinson;Donna L. Lamping

Frequent Co-Authors

Emily Grundy
Emily Grundy University of Essex
Shah Ebrahim
Shah Ebrahim London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Steve Iliffe
Steve Iliffe University College London
Richard W Morris
Richard W Morris University of Bristol
Gene Rowe
Gene Rowe Norwich University
Elizabeth Goyder
Elizabeth Goyder University of Sheffield
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards Bangor University
Christina R. Victor
Christina R. Victor Brunel University London
Juan P. Casas
Juan P. Casas Boston University
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about healthcare but not sure if the path to becoming a physician is right for you, there are many related online degrees and career pathways to consider. For those interested in technology and patient data, health information technology programs online offer a route into managing healthcare records and systems from anywhere. These programs often lead to in-demand roles in hospitals and clinics.

Another option is earning a medical coding certification online, which prepares you to work in medical billing, coding, and reimbursement. This field is vital for ensuring accurate healthcare payments and insurance claims.

Nursing is another flexible and rewarding career. There are affordable online fnp programs for those aiming to become Family Nurse Practitioners, allowing for advanced nursing roles with greater responsibility and autonomy. For current registered nurses, a cheapest rn to bsn online program can be an affordable way to expand your skills and credentials.

These online degree and certification options make it easier than ever to build a diverse and meaningful healthcare career—even if you’re not pursuing a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Bowling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles