World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
71
Citations
17780
World Ranking
19997
National Ranking
1800

Elaine Thomas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine Thomas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 173 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elaine Thomas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine Thomas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elaine Thomas is affiliated with Keele University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within Medicine and Environmental Science. The principal areas of study include Ecology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers topics such as:

  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment

Elaine Thomas has contributed to research published in several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Wildlife Research
  • Respiratory Medicine Case Reports
  • Journal of Nursing Care Quality

Notable recent publications include:

  • "TBC1D1 interacting proteins, VPS13A and VPS13C, regulate GLUT4 homeostasis in C2C12 myotubes" (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • "Cost-effectiveness of volunteer and contract ground-based shooting of sambar deer in Australia" (2022, Wildlife Research)
  • "Delayed HIV diagnosis in a cystic fibrosis patient: Not just another exacerbation" (2021, Respiratory Medicine Case Reports)
  • "Student-Led Mobility Interventions for Hospitalized Adults" (2024, Journal of Nursing Care Quality)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Sharon C. Hook, Alexandra Chadt, Kate J. Heesom, Shosei Kishida, and Hadi Al-Hasani.

Best Publications

  • Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study

    Peter R Croft;Gary J Macfarlane;Ann C Papageorgiou;Elaine Thomas

  • A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies

    Clermont E. Dionne;Kate M. Dunn;Peter R. Croft;Alf L. Nachemson

  • Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review

    D. A. W. M. Van Der Windt;E. Thomas;D. P. Pope;A. F. De Winter

  • Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study

    Elaine Thomas;Alan J Silman;Peter R Croft;Ann C Papageorgiou

  • The prevalence of pain and pain interference in a general population of older adults: cross-sectional findings from the North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project (NorStOP)

    Elaine Thomas;George Peat;Lindsey Harris;Ross Wilkie

  • Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population.

    Peter R. Croft;Martyn Lewis;Ann C. Papageorgiou;Elaine Thomas

  • Psychologic distress and low back pain : evidence from a prospective study in the general population

    Peter R. Croft;Ann C. Papageorgiou;Susan Ferry;Elaine Thomas

  • Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

    Christian D Mallen;George Peat;Elaine Thomas;Kate M Dunn

  • Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care

    Nadine E. Foster;Elaine Thomas;Annette Bishop;Kate M. Dunn

  • Sjögren's syndrome: a community-based study of prevalence and impact.

    E Thomas;E M Hay;A Hajeer;A J Silman

  • Risk of malignancy among patients with rheumatic conditions.

    Elaine Thomas;David H. Brewster;Roger J. Black;Gary J. Macfarlane

  • Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis

    Simon J Adamson;J Martin Bland;Elaine M Hay;Ruth E Johnson

  • Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: what are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome?

    Nadine E. Foster;Annette Bishop;Elaine Thomas;Chris Main

  • Employment and Physical Work Activities as Predictors of Future Low Back Pain

    Gary J. Macfarlane;Elaine Thomas;Ann C. Papageorgiou;Peter R. Croft

  • How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists

    Annette Bishop;Nadine E. Foster;Elaine Thomas;Elaine M. Hay

  • Acupuncture as an adjunct to exercise based physiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the knee: randomised controlled trial

    Nadine E Foster;Elaine Thomas;Panos Barlas;Jonathan C Hill

  • Weak association between subjective symptoms or and objective testing for dry eyes and dry mouth: results from a population based study.

    Elaine M Hay;E Thomas;B Pal;Ali Hajeer

  • Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain

    Adam P. Garrow;Ann C. Papageorgiou;Alan J. Silman;Elaine Thomas

  • The grading of hallux valgus. The Manchester Scale.

    Adam P. Garrow;Ann Papageorgiou;Alan J. Silman;Elaine Thomas

  • Psychosocial factors in the workplace--do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study.

    Ann C. Papageorgiou;Gary J. Macfarlane;Elaine Thomas;Peter R. Croft

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Croft
Peter Croft Keele University
Elaine M. Hay
Elaine M. Hay Keele University
Nadine E. Foster
Nadine E. Foster University of Queensland
Alan J. Silman
Alan J. Silman University of Oxford
Gary J. Macfarlane
Gary J. Macfarlane University of Aberdeen
Hylton B. Menz
Hylton B. Menz La Trobe University
Chris J. Main
Chris J. Main Keele University
Lex M. Bouter
Lex M. Bouter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ali H. Hajeer
Ali H. Hajeer King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in the field of Medicine but want flexible study options, online degrees in healthcare could be a great fit. Online programs make it easier to balance your studies with work or family commitments, while still gaining industry-recognized qualifications.

For example, an online pharmacy degree can prepare you for pharmacy roles without needing to relocate or pause your career. Another growing area is health data—pursuing a health information management degree online can lead to roles organizing and securing vital patient information.

Many students are also seeking affordable entry points into healthcare support positions. With medical billing and coding online courses cost being more transparent, starting a career in medical billing or coding is accessible and budget-friendly.

For those aspiring to advanced clinical roles, researching the cheapest np school programs online can help you achieve nurse practitioner status at a lower cost. Each of these online pathways offers unique opportunities to advance within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Elaine Thomas

Recently Published Articles