World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Immo Fritsche

Immo Fritsche

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
7698
World Ranking
7527
National Ranking
359

Immo Fritsche publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Immo Fritsche sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Immo Fritsche D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Immo Fritsche sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach

    Eva Jonas;Ian McGregor;Johannes Klackl;Dmitrij Agroskin

  • A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA).

    Immo Fritsche;Markus Barth;Philipp Jugert;Torsten Masson

  • Beyond the 'east-west' dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood.

    Vivian L. Vignoles;Ellinor Owe;Maja Becker;Peter B. Smith

  • Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy

    Philipp Jugert;Katharine H. Greenaway;Markus Barth;Ronja Büchner;Ronja Büchner

  • The Role of Control Motivation in Mortality Salience Effects on Ingroup Support and Defense

    Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Thomas Fankhänel

  • The power of we: Evidence for group-based control

    Immo Fritsche;Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Catharina Ablasser;Magdalena Beyer

  • Still underdetected - social norms and collective efficacy predict the acceptance of electric vehicles in germany

    Markus Barth;Philipp Jugert;Immo Fritsche

  • Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: the interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment.

    Eva Jonas;Andy Martens;Daniela Niesta Kayser;Immo Fritsche

  • Mortality salience and the desire for offspring

    Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Peter Fischer;Nicolas Koranyi

  • Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms

    Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Daniela Niesta Kayser;Nicolas Koranyi

  • Collective Reactions to Threat: Implications for Intergroup Conflict and for Solving Societal Crises

    Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Thomas Kessler

  • Global warming is breeding social conflict: The subtle impact of climate change threat on authoritarian tendencies

    Immo Fritsche;Immo Fritsche;J. Christopher Cohrs;Thomas Kessler;Judith Bauer

  • The Malicious Effects of Existential Threat on Motivation to Protect the Natural Environment and the Role of Environmental Identity as a Moderator

    Immo Fritsche;Katrin Häfner

  • Contextualism as an Important Facet of Individualism-Collectivism Personhood Beliefs Across 37 National Groups

    Ellinor Owe;Vivian L. Vignoles;Maja Becker;Rupert Brown

  • Currencies as cultural symbols – an existential psychological perspective on reactions of Germans toward the Euro

    Eva Jonas;Immo Fritsche;Jeff Greenberg

  • Adherence to climate change-related ingroup norms: Do dimensions of group identification matter?

    Torsten Masson;Immo Fritsche

  • Account Strategies for the Violation of Social Norms: Integration and Extension of Sociological and Social Psychological Typologies

    Immo Fritsche

  • Destined to die but not to wage war: how existential threat can contribute to escalation or de-escalation of violent intergroup conflict.

    Eva Jonas;Immo Fritsche

  • Climate change action as a project of identity: Eight meta-analyses

    Stepan Vesely;Torsten Masson;Parissa Chokrai;Anna M. Becker

  • Striving for group agency: threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups.

    Janine Stollberg;Immo Fritsche;Anna Bäcker

Frequent Co-Authors

Eva Jonas
Eva Jonas University of Salzburg
Thomas Kessler
Thomas Kessler Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Christian A. Klöckner
Christian A. Klöckner Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Peter B. Smith
Peter B. Smith University of Sussex
Seth J. Schwartz
Seth J. Schwartz The University of Texas at Austin
Ronald Fischer
Ronald Fischer Victoria University of Wellington
Rupert Brown
Rupert Brown University of Sussex
Vivian L. Vignoles
Vivian L. Vignoles University of Sussex
Taciano L. Milfont
Taciano L. Milfont University of Waikato
Masaki Yuki
Masaki Yuki Hokkaido University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Immo Fritsche

Recently Published Articles