World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
7584
World Ranking
6465
National Ranking
3502

Richard A. Lippa publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Lippa sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard A. Lippa D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Lippa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard A. Lippa is affiliated with California State University, Fullerton in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a focus on Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology, and Reproductive Medicine.

Their recent scholarly contributions include two papers published in 2020. The first is titled Interest, Personality, and Sexual Traits That Distinguish Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Individuals: Are There Two Dimensions That Underlie Variations in Sexual Orientation?, published in Archives of Sexual Behavior. The second paper, titled Reassessing the Effect of Older Sisters on Sexual Orientation in Men, also appeared in the same publication venue.

These papers reflect a research interest in topics such as LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy; Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology; Gender Roles and Identity Studies; Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences; and Reproductive Health and Technologies.

The scientist has collaborated with co-authors such as Ray Blanchard and has frequently published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

  • Interest, Personality, and Sexual Traits That Distinguish Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Individuals: Are There Two Dimensions That Underlie Variations in Sexual Orientation? (2020, Archives of Sexual Behavior)
  • Reassessing the Effect of Older Sisters on Sexual Orientation in Men (2020, Archives of Sexual Behavior)

  • Ray Blanchard

  • Archives of Sexual Behavior

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

  • Social Psychology
  • Gender Studies
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Reproductive Medicine

  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies

Best Publications

  • Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people-things dimension.

    Richard Lippa

  • Gender, Nature, and Nurture

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Sex Differences in Personality Traits and Gender-Related Occupational Preferences across 53 Nations: Testing Evolutionary and Social-Environmental Theories

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Behavioral Change in Earthquake Preparedness Due to Negative Threat Appeals: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory

    John-Paul Mulilis;Richard Lippa

  • The Preferred Traits of Mates in a Cross-National Study of Heterosexual and Homosexual Men and Women: An Examination of Biological and Cultural Influences

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social structural theories.

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Sex Differences in Mental Rotation and Line Angle Judgments Are Positively Associated with Gender Equality and Economic Development Across 53 Nations

    Richard A. Lippa;Marcia L. Collaer;Michael Peters

  • Sexual Orientation and Personality.

    Richard A Lippa

  • Are 2D:4D finger-length ratios related to sexual orientation? Yes for men, no for women.

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: findings from the BBC Internet survey.

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Gender Differences in Personality and Interests: When, Where, and Why?

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences.

    Richard Lippa;Sharon Connelly

  • Gender, Personality, and Prejudice: The Display of Authoritarianism and Social Dominance in Interviews with College Men and Women ☆

    Richard Lippa;Sara Arad

  • Birth Order, Sibling Sex Ratio, Handedness, and Sexual Orientation of Male and Female Participants in a BBC Internet Research Project

    Ray Blanchard;Richard A. Lippa

  • Gender-Related Traits in Gay Men, Lesbian Women, and Heterosexual Men and Women: The Virtual Identity of Homosexual-Heterosexual Diagnosticity and Gender Diagnosticity

    Richard A. Lippa

  • On Deconstructing and Reconstructing Masculinity–Femininity ☆

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Gender-related traits of heterosexual and homosexual men and women.

    Richard A. Lippa

  • Expressive control and the leakage of dispositional introversion-extraversion during role-played teaching.

    Richard Lippa

  • Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: reliability, validity, consistency across domains, and relationship to the big five.

    Richard Lippa

  • Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the big five and circumplex models

    Richard Lippa

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray Blanchard
Ray Blanchard University of Toronto
Qazi Rahman
Qazi Rahman King's College London
Drew H. Bailey
Drew H. Bailey University of California, Irvine
Marco Del Giudice
Marco Del Giudice University of New Mexico
David A. Puts
David A. Puts Pennsylvania State University
J. Michael Bailey
J. Michael Bailey Northwestern University
David P. Schmitt
David P. Schmitt Kansas State University
Michael Peters
Michael Peters University of Guelph
Howard S. Friedman
Howard S. Friedman University of California, Riverside
Paul L. Vasey
Paul L. Vasey University of Lethbridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens a range of online study and career options, especially in the field of counseling and mental health services. One popular path is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a role that requires specialized education and often state-specific certification. The journey and requirements can vary depending on where you plan to work.

For those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Glendale, the process may include earning a degree, gaining supervised experience, and obtaining licensure. Similarly, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Greensboro involves tailored steps to meet local professional standards.

Each location has unique guidelines—for example, explore substance abuse counselor requirements in Henderson for specific educational and fieldwork criteria. If you are considering a move or remote work, learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Honolulu will help you understand the distinct legal and educational requirements for that region.

An online psychology degree can be a flexible starting point for advancing a career in substance abuse counseling and meeting the requirements in various locations.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Lippa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles