World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Peters

Michael Peters

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
10854
World Ranking
5206
National Ranking
350

Michael Peters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Peters sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael Peters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Peters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Peters is affiliated with the University of Guelph in Canada. Their academic profile currently does not list specific papers, co-authors, book publications, or detailed fields of study. As such, the available information focuses primarily on their institutional association.

Due to the absence of detailed data on research topics, publication records, or areas of expertise, no further scientific or academic content can be reliably outlined. There are no recent publications, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues documented for this individual.

There are also no recorded awards or honors associated with this researcher. Information about deceased status confirms that they are currently alive.

Best Publications

  • A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: different versions and factors that affect performance.

    Michael Peters;Bruno Laeng;Kerry Latham;Marla Jackson

  • Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks.

    Kirsten Jordan;Torsten Wüstenberg;Hans Jochen Heinze;Michael Peters

  • Footedness: asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological assessment of foot movement.

    Michael Peters

  • Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists.

    L Jäncke;N.J Shah;M Peters

  • The Hunter-Gatherer Theory of Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities: Data from 40 Countries

    Irwin Silverman;Jean Choi;Michael Peters

  • The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D:4D).

    John T. Manning;Andrew J. G. Churchill;Michael Peters

  • Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioral variables in 255,100 subjects: the BBC internet study.

    Michael Peters;Stian Reimers;John T. Manning

  • Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library

    Michael Peters;Christian Battista

  • Sex Differences in Mental Rotation and Line Angle Judgments Are Positively Associated with Gender Equality and Economic Development Across 53 Nations

    Richard A. Lippa;Marcia L. Collaer;Michael Peters

  • Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems

    Michael Peters

  • Finger length and distal finger extent patterns in humans

    Michael Peters;Kevin Mackenzie;Pam Bryden

  • Why the Preferred Hand Taps More Quickly than the Non-preferred Hand: Three Experiments on Handedness*

    Michael Peters

  • Differential magnetic resonance signal change in human sensorimotor cortex to finger movements of different rate of the dominant and subdominant hand.

    L Jäncke;M Peters;G Schlaug;S Posse

  • Constraints in the performance of bimanual tasks and their expression in unskilled and skilled subjects

    Michael Peters

  • The Effects of Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Digit Ratio (2D:4D) on Mental Rotation Performance

    Michael Peters;John T. Manning;Stian Reimers

  • fMRI study of bimanual coordination.

    L Jäncke;M Peters;M Himmelbach;T Nösselt

  • Handedness measured by finger tapping: a continuous variable.

    Michael Peters;Bruce M. Durding

  • Attentional Asymmetries during Concurrent Bimanual Performance

    Michael Peters

  • Left-handers and right-handers compared on a motor task.

    Michael Peters;Bruce Durding

  • Unsolved Problems in Comparing Brain Sizes in Homo Sapiens

    M. Peters;L. Jäncke;J.F. Staiger;G. Schlaug

Frequent Co-Authors

Lutz Jäncke
Lutz Jäncke University of Zurich
Bruno Laeng
Bruno Laeng University of Oslo
John T. Manning
John T. Manning Swansea University
Helmuth Steinmetz
Helmuth Steinmetz Goethe University Frankfurt
Gottfried Schlaug
Gottfried Schlaug University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Torsten Wüstenberg
Torsten Wüstenberg Heidelberg University
Karsten Specht
Karsten Specht University of Bergen
Richard A. Lippa
Richard A. Lippa California State University, Fullerton
Elizabeth A. Maylor
Elizabeth A. Maylor University of Warwick
Clare Porac
Clare Porac Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Students interested in mental health often consider counseling, clinical psychology, or social work as next steps in their academic journey. These fields offer flexible online options that cater to diverse interests, locations, and career ambitions.

Degree seekers can choose from highly regarded programs across the country. For example, the popular counseling programs in Massachusetts are known for their comprehensive curricula and skilled faculty. Likewise, the most popular counseling degree programs in Michigan provide a range of specializations, from school counseling to mental health counseling. Those aiming for excellence may be drawn to the best-ranked counseling degree programs in New Jersey.

City-specific offerings, such as the popular counseling programs in Philadelphia, highlight how location can influence both curriculum and career opportunities. No matter your background or goals, these online degree pathways in counseling and psychology empower you to build a meaningful, flexible, and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles