World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
7323
World Ranking
9406
National Ranking
4980

Drew H. Bailey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Drew H. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Drew H. Bailey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Drew H. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Drew H. Bailey is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a specialization in education and cognitive psychology subfields. Their work addresses educational and developmental topics using empirical and experimental approaches.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • School Choice and Performance
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Bailey has contributed to the following notable recent papers:

  • Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects: Mechanisms and Potential Solutions (2020, Gothic.net)
  • Reciprocal effects of reading and mathematics? Beyond the cross-lagged panel model. (2020, Developmental Psychology)
  • When do students begin to think that one has to be either a "math person" or a "language person"? A meta-analytic review. (2021, Psychological Bulletin)
  • Dual-task studies of working memory and arithmetic performance: A meta-analysis. (2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition)
  • Fraction ball: Playful and physically active fraction and decimal learning. (2022, Journal of Educational Psychology)

Frequent coauthors of Bailey include:

  • Daniela Alvarez-Vargas
  • Sirui Wan
  • Greg J. Duncan
  • Jacquelynne S. Eccles
  • Jade Marcus Jenkins

Bailey's research is often published in venues such as:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Psychological Bulletin
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Journal of Educational Psychology

Best Publications

  • Persistence and Fadeout in the Impacts of Child and Adolescent Interventions

    Drew Bailey;Greg J. Duncan;Candice L. Odgers;Winnie Yu

  • Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement

    Lisa K. Fazio;Drew H. Bailey;Clarissa A. Thompson;Robert S. Siegler;Robert S. Siegler

  • Mathematical Cognition Deficits in Children With Learning Disabilities and Persistent Low Achievement: A Five-Year Prospective Study

    David C. Geary;Mary K. Hoard;Lara Nugent;Drew H. Bailey

  • Adolescents' functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge.

    David C. Geary;Mary K. Hoard;Lara Nugent;Drew H. Bailey

  • Fractions: the new frontier for theories of numerical development

    Robert S. Siegler;Robert S. Siegler;Lisa K. Fazio;Drew H. Bailey;Xinlin Zhou

  • Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement.

    Drew H. Bailey;Mary K. Hoard;Lara Nugent;David C. Geary

  • Predicting Mathematical Achievement and Mathematical Learning Disability With a Simple Screening Tool: The Number Sets Test.

    David C. Geary;Drew H. Bailey;Mary K. Hoard

  • Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge

    Drew H. Bailey;Robert S. Siegler;Robert S. Siegler;David C. Geary

  • Women's attractiveness changes with estradiol and progesterone across the ovulatory cycle.

    David A. Puts;Drew H. Bailey;Rodrigo A. Cárdenas;Robert P. Burriss

  • First-Grade Predictors of Mathematical Learning Disability: A Latent Class Trajectory Analysis.

    David C. Geary;Drew H. Bailey;Andrew Littlefield;Phillip Wood

  • Fact Retrieval Deficits in Low Achieving Children and Children With Mathematical Learning Disability

    David C. Geary;Mary K. Hoard;Drew H. Bailey

  • Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects: Mechanisms and Potential Solutions.

    Drew H Bailey;Greg J Duncan;Flávio Cunha;Barbara R Foorman

  • Countries with Higher Levels of Gender Equality Show Larger National Sex Differences in Mathematics Anxiety and Relatively Lower Parental Mathematics Valuation for Girls

    Gijsbert Stoet;Drew H. Bailey;Alex M. Moore;David C. Geary

  • Hominid Brain Evolution

    Drew H. Bailey;David C. Geary

  • Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids.

    David A. Puts;Alexander K. Hill;Drew H. Bailey;Robert S. Walker

  • Body counts in lowland South American violence

    Robert S. Walker;Drew H. Bailey

  • State and Trait Effects on Individual Differences in Children’s Mathematical Development

    Drew H. Bailey;Tyler W. Watts;Andrew K. Littlefield;David C. Geary

  • Risky business: Correlation and causation in longitudinal studies of skill development.

    Drew H. Bailey;Greg J. Duncan;Tyler Watts;Douglas H. Clements

  • Achievement Gaps in the Wake of COVID-19

    Drew H. Bailey;Greg J. Duncan;Richard J. Murnane;Natalie Au Yeung

  • Salivary testosterone does not predict mental rotation performance in men or women

    David A. Puts;Rodrigo A. Cárdenas;Drew H. Bailey;Robert P. Burriss

  • The Codevelopment of Skill at and Preference for Use of Retrieval-Based Processes for Solving Addition Problems: Individual and Sex Differences from First to Sixth Grades.

    Drew H. Bailey;Andrew Littlefield;David C. Geary

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Geary
David C. Geary University of Missouri
Robert S. Siegler
Robert S. Siegler Columbia University
David A. Puts
David A. Puts Pennsylvania State University
Greg J. Duncan
Greg J. Duncan University of California, Irvine
Douglas H. Clements
Douglas H. Clements University of Denver
Julie Sarama
Julie Sarama University of Denver
Lisa L. M. Welling
Lisa L. M. Welling Oakland University
Andrew K. Littlefield
Andrew K. Littlefield Texas Tech University
J. Michael Bailey
J. Michael Bailey Northwestern University
Marco Del Giudice
Marco Del Giudice University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Psychology in the USA, there are many related online degrees and professional pathways to consider. A popular career choice for psychology graduates is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which requires a specialized combination of education, supervised clinical experience, and licensure.

Education requirements can vary based on location. For example, the Colorado Springs mft education requirements emphasize state-accredited graduate programs and comprehensive training hours. In other areas, such as Columbus, learning how to become an mft in Columbus involves state-specific licensing exams and internships.

Many online degrees also cater to students aiming to be licensed in cities like Corpus Christi, where it’s important to understand how to become a marriage and family therapist in Corpus Christi. Similarly, those pursuing opportunities in Dallas should review the mft requirements in Dallas to align their academic choices with professional goals.

Exploring these options can help you choose the right online degree and map your preferred career path in the growing field of psychological services.

Best Scientists Citing Drew H. Bailey

Trending Scientists