World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
24045
World Ranking
16655
National Ranking
8360

David P. Wood publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Wood sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 440 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David P. Wood D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Wood sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Wood is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on computer science and medicine.

The scientist has contributed to research in areas such as pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiation, computer networks and communications, signal processing, and artificial intelligence. Their work addresses several advanced topics including prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, prostate cancer treatment and research, advanced radiotherapy techniques, network security and intrusion detection, advanced malware detection techniques, and anomaly detection techniques and applications.

David P. Wood's recent publications include:

  • Common Variation in the BRCA1 Gene and Prostate Cancer Risk (2020) published in UNC Libraries
  • Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy Timing and Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life (2024) published in JAMA Network Open
  • LMP-GAN: Out-of-Distribution Detection for Non-Control Data Malware Attacks (2025) published in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as JAMA Network Open, UNC Libraries, and IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Sagar A. Patel
  • Dattatraya Patil
  • Joseph A. Smith
  • Christopher S. Saigal
  • Mark S. Litwin

Best Publications

  • Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Cystectomy Compared with Cystectomy Alone for Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer

    H. Barton Grossman;Ronald B. Natale;Catherine M. Tangen;V.O. Speights

  • Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

    Martin G. Sanda;Rodney L. Dunn;Jeff Michalski;Howard M. Sandler

  • Predicting 15-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy

    Scott E. Eggener;Peter T. Scardino;Patrick C. Walsh;Misop Han

  • Phase II randomized clinical trial of lycopene supplementation before radical prostatectomy

    Omer Kucuk;Fazlul H. Sarkar;Wael Sakr;Zora Djuric

  • Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy for Patients Treated in the Prostate-Specific Antigen Era

    Andrew J. Stephenson;Michael W. Kattan;James A. Eastham;Fernando J. Bianco

  • NEOADJUVANT ANDROGEN ABLATION BEFORE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN cT2bNxMo PROSTATE CANCER: 5-YEAR RESULTS

    Mark S. Soloway;Kapil Pareek;Rooholiah Sharifi;Zev Wajsman

  • Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion Transcript Stratifies Prostate Cancer Risk in Men with Elevated Serum PSA

    Scott A. Tomlins;Sheila M. J. Aubin;Javed Siddiqui;Robert J. Lonigro

  • Prediction of Erectile Function Following Treatment for Prostate Cancer

    Mehrdad Alemozaffar;Meredith M. Regan;Matthew R. Cooperberg;John T. Wei

  • LIMITED ROLE OF RADIONUCLIDE BONE SCINTIGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ELEVATIONS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

    Michael L. Cher;Fernando J. Jr Bianco;John S. Lam;Lawrence P. Davis

  • Phase III Study of Molecularly Targeted Adjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Urothelial Cancer of the Bladder Based on p53 Status

    Walter M. Stadler;Seth P. Lerner;Susan Groshen;John P. Stein

  • Her-2/neu overexpression in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder : Prognostic significance and comparative analysis in primary and metastatic tumors

    Rafael E. Jimenez;Maha Hussain;Fernando J. Bianco;Ulka Vaishampayan

  • Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management.

    Katherine E. Maturen;Hanh V. Nghiem;Elaine M. Caoili;Ellen G. Higgins

  • Adenocarcinoma of the prostate in cystoprostatectomy specimens removed for bladder cancer.

    James E. Montie;David P. Wood;J. Edson Pontes;James M. Boyett

  • Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer–specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

    John A. Brockman;Shaheen Alanee;Andrew J. Vickers;Peter T. Scardino

  • Effects of Lycopene Supplementation in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

    Omer Kucuk;Fazlul H. Sarkar;Zora Djuric;Wael Sakr

  • Quality of pathologic response and surgery correlate with survival for patients with completely resected bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Guru Sonpavde;Bryan H. Goldman;V. O. Speights;Seth P. Lerner

  • Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses.

    Rou Wang;J. Stuart Wolf;David P. Wood;Ellen J. Higgins

  • Cystectomy Delay More Than 3 Months From Initial Bladder Cancer Diagnosis Results in Decreased Disease Specific and Overall Survival

    Cheryl T. Lee;Rabii Madii;Stephanie Daignault;Rodney L. Dunn

  • Effect of Intravesical Instillation of Gemcitabine vs Saline Immediately Following Resection of Suspected Low-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer on Tumor Recurrence: SWOG S0337 Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Edward M. Messing;Catherine M. Tangen;Seth P. Lerner;Deepak M. Sahasrabudhe

  • Randomized prospective study comparing radical prostatectomy alone versus radical prostatectomy preceded by androgen blockade in clinical stage B2 (T2bNxM0) prostate cancer. The Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group.

    Soloway Ms;Sharifi R;Wajsman Z;McLeod D

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Montie
James E. Montie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Wael Sakr
Wael Sakr Wayne State University
David J. Grignon
David J. Grignon Indiana University
Rodney L. Dunn
Rodney L. Dunn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John T. Wei
John T. Wei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eric A. Klein
Eric A. Klein Cleveland Clinic
Catherine M. Tangen
Catherine M. Tangen Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Maha Hussain
Maha Hussain Northwestern University
J. Stuart Wolf
J. Stuart Wolf The University of Texas at Austin
E. David Crawford
E. David Crawford University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine opens the door to a variety of allied healthcare roles and academic pathways. For those seeking advanced practice opportunities, the easiest dnp program reddit options may provide valuable insights into flexible, user-friendly doctoral programs in nursing. These routes can help registered nurses expand their expertise and leadership potential.

If you're interested in a quicker entry into the nursing field, fast track lpn pathways allow you to become a Licensed Practical Nurse with accelerated online courses. Those focused on mental health can explore msn to pmhnp online programs, which prepare nurses for specialized roles as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners.

Beyond direct patient care, there's also growing demand for healthcare managers and administrators. Pursuing an online health management degree can open up administrative careers in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare organizations. These related online degrees offer flexible options for students with different goals within the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing David P. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles