World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
24281
World Ranking
17502
National Ranking
8761

J. Stuart Wolf publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Stuart Wolf sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 449 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

J. Stuart Wolf D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Stuart Wolf sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Stuart Wolf is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States and specializes in medical research with an emphasis on urology and surgical outcomes. Their work is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with notable subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Urology.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics related to kidney stones, ureteral procedures, and surgical outcomes. Notable papers include:

  • The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Elements that Most Greatly Impact Length of Stay and Readmission, 2020, The American Surgeon
  • Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation (SURE) for Large Renal Stones: A Multi-Institutional Center Study, 2023, Journal of Endourology
  • Biopsy Cell Cycle Proliferation Score Predicts Adverse Surgical Pathology in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma, 2020, European Urology
  • Appropriateness Criteria for Ureteral Stent Omission following Ureteroscopy for Urinary Stone Disease, 2022, Urology Practice
  • A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation Compared with Standard Ureteroscopy: 30-Day Results of the ASPIRE Study, 2024, Journal of Endourology

The main topics addressed by J. Stuart Wolf's research include:

  • Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
  • Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Ureteral Procedures and Complications
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management

They have published frequently in several medical journals, particularly:

  • Journal of Endourology
  • Urology
  • The Journal of Urology
  • The American Surgeon
  • European Urology

J. Stuart Wolf has collaborated multiple times with several co-authors who contribute to related fields of study. Frequent collaborators include:

  • E. Charles Osterberg
  • Stephanie Daignault-Newton
  • Bahaa S. Malaeb
  • Sapan N. Ambani
  • Karen Stern

Their research addresses clinical challenges in urology, especially focusing on the management and treatment of renal stones and urinary tract complications, with significant attention to improving surgical outcomes and procedural safety. Their work intersects with pediatric care, anesthesiology, and respiratory medicine, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within medical sciences.

Best Publications

  • 2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral Calculi

    Glenn M. Preminger;Hans Göran Tiselius;Dean G. Assimos;Peter Alken

  • Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations.

    Glenn M. Preminger;Dean G. Assimos;James E. Lingeman;Stephen Y. Nakada

  • Guideline for the Management of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (Stages Ta, T1, and Tis): 2007 Update

    M. Craig Hall;Sam S. Chang;Guido Dalbagni;Raj Som Pruthi

  • Best Practice Policy Statement on Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

    J. Stuart Wolf;Carol J. Bennett;Roger R. Dmochowski;Brent K. Hollenbeck

  • Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

    Margaret S. Pearle;James E. Lingeman;Raymond Leveillee;Ramsay Kuo

  • COMPLICATIONS OF URETEROSCOPY: ANALYSIS OF PREDICTIVE FACTORS

    Timothy G. Schuster;Brent K. Hollenbeck;Gary J. Faerber;J. Stuart Wolf

  • Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy After Prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline

    Ian M. Thompson;Ian M. Thompson;Richard K. Valicenti;Richard K. Valicenti;Peter Albertsen;Peter Albertsen;Brian J. Davis;Brian J. Davis

  • Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

    Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette;Dedan Opondo;Francisco P.J. Daels;Guido Giusti

  • Pulsed Cavitational Ultrasound: A Noninvasive Technology for Controlled Tissue Ablation (Histotripsy) in the Rabbit Kidney

    William W. Roberts;Timothy L. Hall;Kimberly Ives;J. Stuart Wolf

  • Estimated Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates Associated with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

    Marshall L. Stoller;J. Stuart Wolf;Mark A. St. Lezin

  • Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy--part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up.

    Gary D Grossfeld;Mark S Litwin;J.Stuart Wolf;Hedvig Hricak

  • Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy.

    J. Stuart Wolf;Robert M. Merion;Alan B. Leichtman;Darrell A. Campbell

  • HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY: COMPARISON TO STANDARD LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY

    J. Stuart Wolf;Timothy D. Moon;Stephen Y. Nakada

  • Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: summary of the AUA best practice policy recommendations.

    Gary D. Grossfeld;J. Stuart Wolf;Mark S. Litwin;Hedvig Hricak

  • Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management.

    Katherine E. Maturen;Hanh V. Nghiem;Elaine M. Caoili;Ellen G. Higgins

  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

    J. Stuart Wolf;Marie Blanche Tchetgen;Robert M. Merion

  • Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi

    Margaret Pearle;Robert Nadler;Eduardo Bercowsky;Cathy Chen

  • Accuracy of Determining Small Renal Mass Management with Risk Stratified Biopsies: Confirmation by Final Pathology

    Schuyler J. Halverson;Lakshmi P. Kunju;Ritu Bhalla;Adam J. Gadzinski

  • Original Articles: Prostate Cancer: The Use and Accuracy of Cross-Sectional Imaging and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for Detection of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases Before Radical Prostatectomy

    J. Stuart Wolf;Michael Cher;Marc Dall'Era;Joseph C. Presti

  • Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy--part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology.

    Gary D Grossfeld;Mark S Litwin;J.Stuart Wolf;Hedvig Hricak

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph V. Clayman
Ralph V. Clayman University of California, Irvine
Rodney L. Dunn
Rodney L. Dunn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James E. Montie
James E. Montie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David P. Wood
David P. Wood University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John T. Wei
John T. Wei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter R. Carroll
Peter R. Carroll University of California, San Francisco
Rohit Mehra
Rohit Mehra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jay D. Raman
Jay D. Raman Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Elspeth M. McDougall
Elspeth M. McDougall University of British Columbia
Scott E. Eggener
Scott E. Eggener University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways beyond traditional medical school can open a world of healthcare opportunities. Online degrees are increasingly popular among students seeking flexible options to advance their careers in the medical field.

For those interested in healthcare administration, cahme-accredited programs offer reputable, online Master of Healthcare Administration degrees. These respected courses prepare graduates for leadership roles in health organizations.

Registered Nurses looking to quickly earn a bachelor’s degree might explore online rn to bsn no clinicals programs. These courses often eliminate in-person clinical requirements, making career advancement more accessible for working professionals.

Those considering advanced nursing leadership roles may benefit from accelerated msn to dnp programs. These fastest pathways allow motivated nurses to quickly earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. Fortunately, some of the cheapest online dnp programs are available completely online, helping future leaders minimize debt while advancing their education.

Best Scientists Citing J. Stuart Wolf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles