World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17502 16448 8761 8095 449 24281

J. Stuart Wolf publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. Stuart Wolf between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. Stuart Wolf published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2005. 6 of the 462 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2005. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 26 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
1990 2025

462 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. Stuart Wolf: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 3
1992 3
1993 4
1994 8
1995 6
1996 14
1997 8
1998 9
1999 5
2000 7
2001 20
2002 10
2003 11
2004 26
2005 30
2006 17
2007 27
2008 25
2009 23
2010 21
2011 24
2012 25
2013 16
2014 23
2015 23
2016 18
2017 16
2018 12
2019 4
2020 7
2021 6
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
2025 5
Total 462
Download as CSV

J. Stuart Wolf publications per year - data summary

  • J. Stuart Wolf, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, has 462 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 30 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1990 and 2024, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 12.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.8 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 16 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2001: 88 publications (7.3 per year); 2002-2013: 255 publications (21.3 per year); 2014-2025: 119 publications (9.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

J. Stuart Wolf publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Stuart Wolf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 449 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 449
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

J. Stuart Wolf publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • J. Stuart Wolf, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, records 449 publications - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than J. Stuart Wolf, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and J. Stuart Wolf falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

J. Stuart Wolf D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Stuart Wolf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

J. Stuart Wolf D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • J. Stuart Wolf, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, records 79 D-Index - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than J. Stuart Wolf, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and J. Stuart Wolf ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

J. Stuart Wolf is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States and specializes in medical research with an emphasis on urology and surgical outcomes. Their work is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with notable subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Urology.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics related to kidney stones, ureteral procedures, and surgical outcomes. Notable papers include:

  • The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Elements that Most Greatly Impact Length of Stay and Readmission, 2020, The American Surgeon
  • Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation (SURE) for Large Renal Stones: A Multi-Institutional Center Study, 2023, Journal of Endourology
  • Biopsy Cell Cycle Proliferation Score Predicts Adverse Surgical Pathology in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma, 2020, European Urology
  • Appropriateness Criteria for Ureteral Stent Omission following Ureteroscopy for Urinary Stone Disease, 2022, Urology Practice
  • A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation Compared with Standard Ureteroscopy: 30-Day Results of the ASPIRE Study, 2024, Journal of Endourology

The main topics addressed by J. Stuart Wolf's research include:

  • Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
  • Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Ureteral Procedures and Complications
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management

They have published frequently in several medical journals, particularly:

  • Journal of Endourology
  • Urology
  • The Journal of Urology
  • The American Surgeon
  • European Urology

J. Stuart Wolf has collaborated multiple times with several co-authors who contribute to related fields of study. Frequent collaborators include:

  • E. Charles Osterberg
  • Stephanie Daignault-Newton
  • Bahaa S. Malaeb
  • Sapan N. Ambani
  • Karen Stern

Their research addresses clinical challenges in urology, especially focusing on the management and treatment of renal stones and urinary tract complications, with significant attention to improving surgical outcomes and procedural safety. Their work intersects with pediatric care, anesthesiology, and respiratory medicine, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within medical sciences.

Best Publications

  • 2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral Calculi

    Glenn M. Preminger;Hans Göran Tiselius;Dean G. Assimos;Peter Alken

  • Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations.

    Glenn M. Preminger;Dean G. Assimos;James E. Lingeman;Stephen Y. Nakada

  • Guideline for the Management of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (Stages Ta, T1, and Tis): 2007 Update

    M. Craig Hall;Sam S. Chang;Guido Dalbagni;Raj Som Pruthi

  • Best Practice Policy Statement on Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

    J. Stuart Wolf;Carol J. Bennett;Roger R. Dmochowski;Brent K. Hollenbeck

  • Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

    Margaret S. Pearle;James E. Lingeman;Raymond Leveillee;Ramsay Kuo

  • COMPLICATIONS OF URETEROSCOPY: ANALYSIS OF PREDICTIVE FACTORS

    Timothy G. Schuster;Brent K. Hollenbeck;Gary J. Faerber;J. Stuart Wolf

  • Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy After Prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline

    Ian M. Thompson;Ian M. Thompson;Richard K. Valicenti;Richard K. Valicenti;Peter Albertsen;Peter Albertsen;Brian J. Davis;Brian J. Davis

  • Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

    Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette;Dedan Opondo;Francisco P.J. Daels;Guido Giusti

  • Pulsed Cavitational Ultrasound: A Noninvasive Technology for Controlled Tissue Ablation (Histotripsy) in the Rabbit Kidney

    William W. Roberts;Timothy L. Hall;Kimberly Ives;J. Stuart Wolf

  • Estimated Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates Associated with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

    Marshall L. Stoller;J. Stuart Wolf;Mark A. St. Lezin

  • Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy--part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up.

    Gary D Grossfeld;Mark S Litwin;J.Stuart Wolf;Hedvig Hricak

  • Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy.

    J. Stuart Wolf;Robert M. Merion;Alan B. Leichtman;Darrell A. Campbell

  • HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY: COMPARISON TO STANDARD LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY

    J. Stuart Wolf;Timothy D. Moon;Stephen Y. Nakada

  • Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: summary of the AUA best practice policy recommendations.

    Gary D. Grossfeld;J. Stuart Wolf;Mark S. Litwin;Hedvig Hricak

  • Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management.

    Katherine E. Maturen;Hanh V. Nghiem;Elaine M. Caoili;Ellen G. Higgins

  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

    J. Stuart Wolf;Marie Blanche Tchetgen;Robert M. Merion

  • Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi

    Margaret Pearle;Robert Nadler;Eduardo Bercowsky;Cathy Chen

  • Accuracy of Determining Small Renal Mass Management with Risk Stratified Biopsies: Confirmation by Final Pathology

    Schuyler J. Halverson;Lakshmi P. Kunju;Ritu Bhalla;Adam J. Gadzinski

  • Original Articles: Prostate Cancer: The Use and Accuracy of Cross-Sectional Imaging and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for Detection of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases Before Radical Prostatectomy

    J. Stuart Wolf;Michael Cher;Marc Dall'Era;Joseph C. Presti

  • Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy--part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology.

    Gary D Grossfeld;Mark S Litwin;J.Stuart Wolf;Hedvig Hricak

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph V. Clayman
Ralph V. Clayman University of California, Irvine
Rodney L. Dunn
Rodney L. Dunn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James E. Montie
James E. Montie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David P. Wood
David P. Wood University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John T. Wei
John T. Wei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter R. Carroll
Peter R. Carroll University of California, San Francisco
Rohit Mehra
Rohit Mehra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jay D. Raman
Jay D. Raman Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Elspeth M. McDougall
Elspeth M. McDougall University of British Columbia
Scott E. Eggener
Scott E. Eggener University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways beyond traditional medical school can open a world of healthcare opportunities. Online degrees are increasingly popular among students seeking flexible options to advance their careers in the medical field.

For those interested in healthcare administration, cahme-accredited programs offer reputable, online Master of Healthcare Administration degrees. These respected courses prepare graduates for leadership roles in health organizations.

Registered Nurses looking to quickly earn a bachelor’s degree might explore online rn to bsn no clinicals programs. These courses often eliminate in-person clinical requirements, making career advancement more accessible for working professionals.

Those considering advanced nursing leadership roles may benefit from accelerated msn to dnp programs. These fastest pathways allow motivated nurses to quickly earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. Fortunately, some of the cheapest online dnp programs are available completely online, helping future leaders minimize debt while advancing their education.

Best Scientists Citing J. Stuart Wolf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles