World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 40 3068 2790 1451 1304 59 14063

Paul K. Brindle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul K. Brindle between 1979 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul K. Brindle published across 45 years, from 1979 to 2023, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2011. 4 of the 67 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2011. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 4 publications
1979 2023

67 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul K. Brindle: publications per year, 1979 to 2023
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 0
1992 3
1993 2
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 5
2007 4
2008 0
2009 1
2010 5
2011 6
2012 3
2013 4
2014 6
2015 1
2016 2
2017 3
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 4
Total 67
Download as CSV

Paul K. Brindle publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul K. Brindle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 57–66 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 59 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17 59
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul K. Brindle D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul K. Brindle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36 40
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul K. Brindle is affiliated with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in the United States. Their professional focus is situated within the biomedical research community linked to this institution.

Available data does not list specific research papers authored by Paul K. Brindle, nor does it detail any frequent co-authors.

Information regarding fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work associated with Paul K. Brindle is not provided, which limits insight into precise areas of scientific expertise or specialization.

There are no records of book publications, awards, or frequent publication venues connected to this researcher in the current data.

This profile is based solely on the primary affiliation and does not include further details on the academic contributions or publication history of Paul K. Brindle.

Best Publications

  • Integrative genome analyses identify key somatic driver mutations of small-cell lung cancer

    Martin Peifer;Lynnette Fernández-Cuesta;Martin L. Sos;Julie George

  • Inactivating mutations of acetyltransferase genes in B-cell lymphoma

    Laura Pasqualucci;David Dominguez-Sola;Annalisa Chiarenza;Giulia Fabbri

  • Activation of cAMP and mitogen responsive genes relies on a common nuclear factor

    J. Arias;A. S. Alberts;A. S. Alberts;P. Brindle;Francois-Xavier Claret

  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Enhance Memory and Synaptic Plasticity via CREB: CBP-Dependent Transcriptional Activation

    Christopher G. Vecsey;Joshua D. Hawk;K. Matthew Lattal;Joel M. Stein

  • Distinct roles of GCN5/PCAF‐mediated H3K9ac and CBP/p300‐mediated H3K18/27ac in nuclear receptor transactivation

    Qihuang Jin;Li Rong Yu;Lifeng Wang;Zhijing Zhang

  • CREBBP mutations in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

    Charles G. Mullighan;Jinghui Zhang;Lawryn H. Kasper;Stephanie Lerach

  • Transcriptional attenuation following cAMP induction requires PP-1-mediated dephosphorylation of CREB

    Masatoshi Hagiwara;Arthur Alberts;Paul Brindle;Judy Meinkoth

  • Coupling of hormonal stimulation and transcription via the cyclic AMP-responsive factor CREB is rate limited by nuclear entry of protein kinase A

    M Hagiwara;P Brindle;A Harootunian;R Armstrong

  • The CREB family of transcription activators.

    Paul K Brindle;Marc R Montminy

  • CREB Binding Protein Interacts with Nucleoporin-Specific FG Repeats That Activate Transcription and Mediate NUP98-HOXA9 Oncogenicity

    Lawryn H. Kasper;Paul K. Brindle;Catherine A. Schnabel;Colin E. J. Pritchard

  • Target gene context influences the transcriptional requirement for the KAT3 family of CBP and p300 histone acetyltransferases

    David C. Bedford;Lawryn H. Kasper;Tomofusa Fukuyama;Paul K. Brindle

  • A role for CREB binding protein and p300 transcriptional coactivators in Ets-1 transactivation functions.

    Cheng Yang;Linda H. Shapiro;Morris Rivera;Alok Kumar

  • Protein-kinase-A-dependent activator in transcription factor CREB reveals new role for CREM repressors.

    Paul Brindle;Steve Linke;Marc Montminy

  • Conditional Knockout Mice Reveal Distinct Functions for the Global Transcriptional Coactivators CBP and p300 in T-Cell Development

    Lawryn H. Kasper;Tomofusa Fukuyama;Michelle A. Biesen;Fayçal Boussouar

  • A transcription-factor-binding surface of coactivator p300 is required for haematopoiesis

    Lawryn H. Kasper;Fayçal Boussouar;Paul A. Ney;Carl W. Jackson

  • A Transcription Factor-Binding Domain of the Coactivator CBP Is Essential for Long-Term Memory and the Expression of Specific Target Genes.

    Marcelo A. Wood;Michelle A. Attner;Ana M.M. Oliveira;Paul K. Brindle

  • Inhibition of p300 impairs Foxp3 + T regulatory cell function and promotes antitumor immunity

    Yujie Liu;Liqing Wang;Jarrod Predina;Rongxiang Han

  • The CREBBP Acetyltransferase Is a Haploinsufficient Tumor Suppressor in B-cell Lymphoma.

    Jiyuan Zhang;Sofija Vlasevska;Victoria A. Wells;Sarah Nataraj

  • Multiple protein kinase A-regulated events are required for transcriptional induction by cAMP.

    Paul Brindle;Toshihiro Nakajima;Marc Montminy

  • Two transactivation mechanisms cooperate for the bulk of HIF-1-responsive gene expression

    Lawryn H Kasper;Fayçal Boussouar;Kelli Boyd;Wu Xu

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Montminy
Marc Montminy Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Charles G. Mullighan
Charles G. Mullighan St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Kelli L. Boyd
Kelli L. Boyd Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Laura Pasqualucci
Laura Pasqualucci Columbia University
Ted Abel
Ted Abel University of Iowa
Marcelo A. Wood
Marcelo A. Wood University of California, Irvine
Riccardo Dalla-Favera
Riccardo Dalla-Favera Columbia University
Wayne W. Hancock
Wayne W. Hancock University of Pennsylvania
Matthew Meyerson
Matthew Meyerson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Molecular Biology opens many doors, especially in the fields of healthcare and research. Programs such as nursing and health sciences are popular options for students seeking flexible, accredited education in the USA. For those considering nursing, comparing programs like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn can reveal key differences in curriculum, cost, and student support.

Affordability is crucial for many learners. Researching the cheapest bsn to msn online programs can help ambitious students advance to higher nursing roles without overwhelming debt. Choosing a reputable institution is also important. Looking into a non profit university ensures you’re getting a high-quality and ethically focused education.

Finally, students with military backgrounds or obligations should check out military friendly colleges to find institutions that offer tailored support and benefits. As the landscape of online education continues to grow, aligning your pathway with the right program will help you build a successful career in molecular biology or related health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Paul K. Brindle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles