World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joaquim Salvi

Joaquim Salvi

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 39 9509 9235 148 146 159 12547

Joaquim Salvi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joaquim Salvi between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joaquim Salvi published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2008. 7 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2008. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1996 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joaquim Salvi: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 5
1999 1
2000 2
2001 5
2002 5
2003 7
2004 9
2005 12
2006 9
2007 8
2008 15
2009 8
2010 13
2011 11
2012 9
2013 10
2014 6
2015 6
2016 5
2017 4
2018 3
2019 4
2020 1
2021 1
2022 2
2023 1
2024 4
2025 3
Total 172
Download as CSV

Joaquim Salvi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joaquim Salvi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 159 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559 159
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Joaquim Salvi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joaquim Salvi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 39
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joaquim Salvi is affiliated with the University of Girona in Spain and has contributed extensively to research at the intersection of medicine and computer science. Their work predominantly centers on neurology and medical imaging, with a significant focus on brain-related conditions and computational methods to support diagnosis and treatment.

Their research spans a range of topics that include brain tumor detection and classification, medical image segmentation techniques, and intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research. Additional areas of their academic interest cover acute ischemic stroke management, COVID-19 diagnosis using artificial intelligence, domain adaptation and few-shot learning, and advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

Joaquim Salvi has published in several peer-reviewed venues, with multiple papers appearing in the SSRN Electronic Journal. Their work also appears in Frontiers in Neuroscience, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Machine Vision and Applications, and Applied Sciences.

Frequent collaborators include Arnau Oliver, Xavier Lladó, Valeriia Abramova, Sergi Valverde, and Albert Clèrigues, illustrating a collaborative research network across various specialties within medical imaging and AI applications.

Notable recent publications by Joaquim Salvi include:

  • Transductive Transfer Learning for Domain Adaptation in Brain Magnetic Resonance Image Segmentation, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Minimizing the Effect of White Matter Lesions on Deep Learning Based Tissue Segmentation for Brain Volumetry, 2022, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
  • Benchmarking the CoW with the TopCoW Challenge: Topology-Aware Anatomical Segmentation of the Circle of Willis for CTA and MRA, 2023, PubMed
  • Motion-region Annotation for Complex Videos via Label Propagation Across Occluders, 2022, Machine Vision and Applications
  • An End-to-End Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Hematoma Expansion in Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients from CT Images, 2024, Applied Sciences

Their publication record reflects integration of advanced computational methods such as deep learning and domain adaptation in addressing clinical challenges related to brain imaging and diagnosis. The collaboration with specialists in artificial intelligence and radiology emphasizes the interdisciplinary nature of their research.

Best Publications

  • Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge

    Spyridon Bakas;Mauricio Reyes;Andras Jakab;Stefan Bauer

  • Pattern codification strategies in structured light systems

    Joaquim Salvi;Jordi Pagès;Joan Batlle

  • A state of the art in structured light patterns for surface profilometry

    Joaquim Salvi;Sergio Fernandez;Tomislav Pribanic;Xavier Llado

  • A review of recent range image registration methods with accuracy evaluation

    Joaquim Salvi;Carles Matabosch;David Fofi;Josep Forest

  • Review of CMOS image sensors

    M. Bigas;E. Cabruja;J. Salvi

  • A comparative review of camera calibrating methods with accuracy evaluation

    Joaquim Salvi;Xavier Armangué;Joan Batlle

  • RECENT PROGRESS IN CODED STRUCTURED LIGHT AS A TECHNIQUE TO SOLVE THE CORRESPONDENCE PROBLEM: A SURVEY

    Joan Batlle;El Mustapha Mouaddib;Joaquim Salvi

  • The SLAM problem: a survey

    Josep Aulinas;Yvan Petillot;Joaquim Salvi;Xavier Lladó

  • Overall view regarding fundamental matrix estimation

    Xavier Armangué;Joaquim Salvi

  • A robust-coded pattern projection for dynamic 3D scene measurement

    J. Salvi;J. Batlle;E. Mouaddib

  • Optimised De Bruijn patterns for one-shot shape acquisition

    Jordi Pagès;Joaquim Salvi;Christophe Collewet;Josep Forest

  • Overview of coded light projection techniques for automatic 3D profiling

    J. Pages;J. Salvi;R. Garcia;C. Matabosch

  • One-shot domain adaptation in multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using convolutional neural networks

    Sergi Valverde;Mostafa Salem;Mariano Cabezas;Deborah Pareto

  • Fourier-based Registration for Robust Forward-looking Sonar Mosaicing in Low-visibility Underwater Environments

    Natília Hurtós;David Ribas;Xavier Cufí;Yvan Petillot

  • Recent progress in structured light in order to solve the correspondence problem in stereovision

    E. Mouaddib;J. Batlle;J. Salvi

  • Laser stripe peak detector for 3D scanners. A FIR filter approach

    J. Salvi;E. Cabruja;C. Pous

  • A Qualitative Review on 3D Coarse Registration Methods

    Yago Díez;Ferran Roure;Xavier Lladó;Joaquim Salvi

  • SLAM With Dynamic Targets via Single-Cluster PHD Filtering

    Chee Sing Lee;Daniel E. Clark;Joaquim Salvi

  • Efficient multiple phase shift patterns for dense 3D acquisition in structured light scanning

    Tomislav Pribanić;Saša Mrvoš;Joaquim Salvi

  • Fourier-based registrations for two-dimensional forward-looking sonar image mosaicing

    Natalia Hurtos;Xavier Cuf;Yvan Petillot;Joaquim Salvi

Frequent Co-Authors

Xavier Lladó
Xavier Lladó University of Girona
Yvan Petillot
Yvan Petillot Heriot-Watt University
Arnau Oliver
Arnau Oliver University of Girona
François Chaumette
François Chaumette University of Rennes
Rafael Garcia
Rafael Garcia Complutense University of Madrid
Tom Vercauteren
Tom Vercauteren King's College London
Arlindo L. Oliveira
Arlindo L. Oliveira University of Lisbon
Koen Van Leemput
Koen Van Leemput Harvard University
Pere Ridao
Pere Ridao University of Girona
Fabrice Meriaudeau
Fabrice Meriaudeau University of Franche-Comté

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and interdisciplinary career options. Many students are considering remote study due to its flexibility and affordability. If you're interested in a faster path, check out the computer science degree online programs, which offer accelerated options for motivated learners.

Looking beyond computer science, you may want to explore related fields. For example, those interested in sustainability might wonder what can you do with an environmental studies degree. This pathway can lead to careers in environmental policy, consulting, and conservation technology.

Cost can be a significant factor when choosing a degree. Explore the cheapest online environmental science degree programs to find high-quality, affordable options. Similarly, if you're interested in engineering, the flexibility of an online mechanical engineering degree may offer a technical career with broad industry applications.

Ultimately, online degrees in these areas can help launch dynamic careers while providing the flexibility many students need.

Best Scientists Citing Joaquim Salvi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles