World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anneke I. den Hollander

Anneke I. den Hollander

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
90
Citations
27835
World Ranking
1076
National Ranking
36

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
29477
World Ranking
11784
National Ranking
453

Anneke I. den Hollander publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anneke I. den Hollander sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 335 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Anneke I. den Hollander D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anneke I. den Hollander sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Anneke I. den Hollander is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several subfields including Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Immunology, and Genetics.

Their work concentrates on topics related to retinal health and associated diseases, covering areas such as Retinal Diseases and Treatments, Retinal Imaging and Analysis, Retinal Development and Disorders, the Complement system in diseases, Glaucoma and retinal disorders, Ocular Diseases and Behçet's Syndrome, as well as Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies.

Recent notable publications include the following papers:

  • "Genome-wide characterization of circulating metabolic biomarkers," 2024, Nature
  • "Risk factors for progression of age-related macular degeneration," 2020, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
  • "Genetic Risk, Lifestyle, and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Europe," 2020, Ophthalmology
  • "Increased circulating levels of Factor H-Related Protein 4 are strongly associated with age-related macular degeneration," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip model of the outer blood-retinal barrier with clinically relevant read-outs for tissue permeability and vascular structure," 2020, Lab on a Chip

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Carel B. Hoyng
  • Anita de Breuk
  • Caroline C. W. Klaver
  • Sascha Fauser
  • Yara Lechanteur

Anneke I. den Hollander has published extensively in several scientific venues, with multiple contributions appearing in:

  • Experimental Eye Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Stem Cell Research
  • Ophthalmology

In recognition of their scholarly contributions, they became a member of the Academia Europaea in 2017.

Best Publications

  • A large genome-wide association study of age-related macular degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants

    Lars G. Fritsche;Wilmar Igl;Jessica N.Cooke Bailey;Felix Grassmann

  • Leber congenital amaurosis: genes, proteins and disease mechanisms.

    Anneke I. den Hollander;Ronald Roepman;Robert K. Koenekoop;Frans P.M. Cremers

  • Mutations in the CEP290 (NPHP6) Gene Are a Frequent Cause of Leber Congenital Amaurosis

    Anneke I. den Hollander;Robert K. Koenekoop;Suzanne Yzer;Irma Lopez

  • Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa

    Sanne K. Verbakel;Ramon A.C. van Huet;Camiel J.F. Boon;Anneke I. den Hollander

  • Autosomal Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa and Cone-rod Dystrophy Caused by Splice Site Mutations in the Stargardt's Disease Gene ABCR

    F.P.M. Cremers;T.J.R. van de Pol;M.A. van Driel;A.I. den Hollander

  • Mutations in a human homologue of Drosophila crumbs cause retinitis pigmentosa (RP12).

    A.I. den Hollander;J.B. ten Brink;Y.J.M. de Kok;S. van Soest

  • Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Europe: The Past and the Future

    Johanna M. Colijn;Gabriëlle H.S. Buitendijk;Elena Prokofyeva;Dalila Alves

  • Protein-altering variants associated with body mass index implicate pathways that control energy intake and expenditure in obesity

    Valérie Turcot;Yingchang Lu;Yingchang Lu;Heather M Highland;Heather M Highland;Claudia Schurmann

  • Leber Congenital Amaurosis and Retinitis Pigmentosa with Coats-like Exudative Vasculopathy Are Associated with Mutations in the Crumbs Homologue 1 (CRB1) Gene

    Anneke I. den Hollander;John R. Heckenlively;L. Ingeborgh van den Born;Yvette J.M. de Kok

  • The spectrum of ocular phenotypes caused by mutations in the BEST1 gene

    Camiel J.F. Boon;B. Jeroen Klevering;Bart P. Leroy;Carel B. Hoyng

  • Next-generation genetic testing for retinitis pigmentosa.

    Kornelia Neveling;Rob W.J. Collin;Christian Gilissen;Ramon A.C. van Huet

  • A common allele in RPGRIP1L is a modifier of retinal degeneration in ciliopathies.

    Hemant Khanna;Erica E Davis;Carlos A Murga-Zamalloa;Alejandro Estrada-Cuzcano

  • Lighting a candle in the dark: advances in genetics and gene therapy of recessive retinal dystrophies.

    Anneke I. den Hollander;Aaron Black;Jean Bennett;Frans P.M. Cremers

  • Risk factors for progression of age‐related macular degeneration

    Thomas J Heesterbeek;Laura Lorés‐Motta;Carel B Hoyng;Yara T E Lechanteur

  • The spectrum of retinal dystrophies caused by mutations in the peripherin/RDS gene

    Camiel J.F. Boon;Anneke I. den Hollander;Carel B. Hoyng;Frans P.M. Cremers

  • Molecular genetics of Leber congenital amaurosis

    Frans P. M. Cremers;José A. J. M. van den Hurk;Anneke I. den Hollander

  • CRB1 mutation spectrum in inherited retinal dystrophies.

    Anneke I. den Hollander;Jason Davis;Saskia D. van der Velde-Visser;Marijke N. Zonneveld

  • Mutations of the CEP290 gene encoding a centrosomal protein cause Meckel-Gruber syndrome

    Valeska Frank;Anneke I. den Hollander;Nadina Ortiz Brüchle;Marijke N. Zonneveld

  • Homozygosity mapping reveals PDE6C mutations in patients with early-onset cone photoreceptor disorders.

    Alberta A.H.J. Thiadens;Alberta A.H.J. Thiadens;Anneke I. den Hollander;Anneke I. den Hollander;Susanne Roosing;Sander B. Nabuurs

  • Mutations in LCA5, encoding the ciliary protein lebercilin, cause Leber congenital amaurosis

    Anneke I den Hollander;Robert K Koenekoop;Moin D Mohamed;Moin D Mohamed;Heleen H Arts

Frequent Co-Authors

Carel B. Hoyng
Carel B. Hoyng Radboud University
Frans P.M. Cremers
Frans P.M. Cremers Radboud University
Rob W.J. Collin
Rob W.J. Collin Radboud University
Caroline C W Klaver
Caroline C W Klaver Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert K. Koenekoop
Robert K. Koenekoop McGill University Health Centre
Ronald Roepman
Ronald Roepman Radboud University
Kornelia Neveling
Kornelia Neveling Radboud University
Mohamed R. Daha
Mohamed R. Daha Leiden University
Anthony T. Moore
Anthony T. Moore University of California, San Francisco
Tim M. Strom
Tim M. Strom Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in genetics, you may also want to explore related health and life science degree programs available online. Many students who study genetics find rewarding careers in healthcare, research, or advanced practice roles. For those aiming to advance in clinical settings, several nurse practitioner courses online provide flexible learning and practical skills to become advanced healthcare providers.

Choosing the best online nursing programs can help students balance their studies with work or family responsibilities. Cost is also an important factor – exploring the most affordable bsn to dnp programs online ensures you don’t compromise on quality while staying within your budget.

For those starting as registered nurses but looking to deepen their expertise, researching the cheapest rn to bsn online options is a smart choice. These degree pathways not only expand career opportunities but also equip graduates with the scientific foundations relevant to genetics and broader healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Anneke I. den Hollander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles