World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guido Chelazzi

Guido Chelazzi

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
3295
World Ranking
7961
National Ranking
170

Guido Chelazzi publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guido Chelazzi sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 142 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Guido Chelazzi D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guido Chelazzi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guido Chelazzi is affiliated with the University of Florence in Italy. Their research spans the fields of Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to studying biological and environmental systems.

Their work covers several subfields, including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, and Genetics. These subfields align with the broader themes in their research that relate to ecosystem dynamics, environmental change, and genetic factors influencing species populations.

Key topics in Guido Chelazzi's research portfolio include Turtle Biology and Conservation, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, and Genetic Diversity and Population Structure. These topics highlight a focus on herpetological species and the genetic underpinnings of their population dynamics, likely contributing to conservation biology and environmental management.

Guido Chelazzi has published in at least one significant venue, Molecular Ecology Resources. This venue is known for interdisciplinary coverage of ecological and molecular data, underlining the integration of genetic and ecological methodologies in their work.

Recent scholarly output includes a paper titled Quaternary Habitat Fluctuations and Demographic Dynamics in Turtles Inferred From Environmental Niche Modelling and Whole Genome Data published in 2025 in Molecular Ecology Resources. This work centers on the use of advanced modeling and genomic tools to investigate habitat changes during the Quaternary period and their impact on turtle populations.

Frequent collaborators in research projects include Marcella Sozzoni, Jennifer Balacco, Massimo Bellavita, Anna Brüniche-Olsen, and Giulio Formenti. These coauthors indicate an active collaboration network, suggesting a multidisciplinary team approach in their scientific investigations.

Best Publications

  • Transcriptome sequencing and microarray development for the Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum: genomic tools for environmental monitoring

    Massimo Milan;Massimo Milan;Alessandro Coppe;Richard Reinhardt;Leonor M Cancela

  • Estimating the energetic cost of fighting in shore crabs by noninvasive monitoring of heartbeat rate.

    Francesco Rovero;Francesco Rovero;Roger N. Hughes;Nia M. Whiteley;Guido Chelazzi

  • Behavioral Adaptation to Intertidal Life

    Guido Chelazzi;Marco Vannini

  • Cardiac and behavioural responses of mussels to risk of predation by dogwhelks.

    Francesco Rovero;Roger N. Hughes;Guido Chelazzi

  • Mediterranean Talitrus saltator (Crustacea, Amphipoda) as a biomonitor of heavy metals contamination.

    A Ugolini;F Borghini;P Calosi;M Bazzicalupo

  • Drivers of Population Structure of the Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea

    Stefania Gaspari;Aviad Scheinin;Draško Holcer;Caterina Maria Fortuna

  • Nesting migrations in a population of the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis (L.) (Chelonia Emydidae) from central Italy

    F. Rovero;G. Chelazzi

  • Assessment of factors affecting heart rate of the limpet Patella vulgata on the natural shore

    G. Santini;G. A. Williams;G. Chelazzi

  • Stable isotopes analysis to assess the trophic role of ants in a Mediterranean agroecosystem

    Lorenzo Ottonetti;Lorenzo Tucci;Guido Chelazzi;Giacomo Santini

  • When time is of the essence: choosing a currency for prey-handling costs

    Francesco Rovero;Francesco Rovero;Roger N. Hughes;Guido Chelazzi

  • Activity patterns of Emys orbicularis L. (Chelonia emydidae) in central Italy

    Unknown

  • In Situ and Laboratory Assessment of Heart Rate in a Mediterranean Limpet Using a Noninvasive Technique

    G Santini;M De Pirro;G Chelazzi

  • Food availability and diet composition of three coexisting Mediterranean limpets (Patella spp.)

    Unknown

  • A comparative study on the movement patterns of two sympatric tropical chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora)

    Guido Chelazzi;Stefano Focardi;Jean-Louis Deneubourg

  • Analysis of Movement Patterns and Orientation Mechanisms in Intertidal Chitons and Gastropods

    Guido Chelazzi;Stefano Focardi;Jean-Louis Deneubourg;Jean-Louis Deneubourg

  • Eco-ethological aspects of homing behaviour in molluscs

    Guido Chelazzi

  • The Rules of Aggression: How Genetic, Chemical and Spatial Factors Affect Intercolony Fights in a Dominant Species, the Mediterranean Acrobat Ant Crematogaster scutellaris.

    Filippo Frizzi;Claudio Ciofi;Leonardo Dapporto;Chiara Natali

  • When the rule becomes the exception. no evidence of gene flow between two Zerynthia cryptic butterflies suggests the emergence of a new model group.

    Francesca Zinetti;Leonardo Dapporto;Alessio Vovlas;Guido Chelazzi

  • Zonal recovery after experimental displacement in two sea urchins co-occurring in the Mediterranean

    Unknown

  • Stable isotope analysis of trophic niche in two co-occurring native and invasive terrapins, Emys orbicularis and Trachemys scripta elegans

    Paride Balzani;Salvatrice Vizzini;Giacomo Santini;Alberto Masoni

  • Population genetic structure of common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Adriatic Sea and contiguous regions : implications for international conservation

    Stefania Gaspari;Draško Holcer;Peter Charles Mackelworth;Caterina Maria Fortuna

  • Effect of experience on predatory behaviour of dogwhelks.

    Francesco Rovero;Roger N. Hughes;Guido Chelazzi

  • Cardiac responses to salinity variations in two differently zoned Mediterranean limpets

    M. De Pirro;G. Santini;G. Chelazzi

  • Ants as bioaccumulators of metals from soils: Body content and tissue-specific distribution of metals in the ant Crematogaster scutellaris

    Elisa Gramigni;Silvia Calusi;Nicla Gelli;Lorenzo Giuntini

  • Intra-specific variability in the temporal organisation of foraging activity in the limpet Patella vulgata

    G. Santini;R. C. Thompson;C. Tendi;S. J. Hawkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Ciofi
Claudio Ciofi University of Florence
Leonardo Dapporto
Leonardo Dapporto University of Florence
Giancarlo Pepeu
Giancarlo Pepeu University of Florence
Gray A. Williams
Gray A. Williams University of Hong Kong
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson Plymouth University
Michael T. Burrows
Michael T. Burrows Scottish Association For Marine Science
Richard G. Hartnoll
Richard G. Hartnoll University of Liverpool
Stefano Focardi
Stefano Focardi National Research Council (CNR)
Luca Bargelloni
Luca Bargelloni University of Padua
Tomaso Patarnello
Tomaso Patarnello University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in Ecology and Evolution but considering diverse academic or career goals? Exploring related online degrees can open doors to fields like nursing, education, or environmental management. Many students compare programs such as capella university vs wgu rn to bsn to find flexible pathways to advance their healthcare careers without sacrificing quality or affordability.

Cost is a key concern for many. Choosing one of the cheapest bsn to msn online programs allows working professionals to upskill while managing tuition expenses. For those seeking trusted, reputable education, it's beneficial to focus on nonprofit online colleges that are accredited and widely recognized by employers.

Active military members and veterans can benefit from specialized support by enrolling in a dedicated online college for military. These institutions often provide flexible scheduling, tuition discounts, and resources tailored to military life, helping you transition your studies or career.

Best Scientists Citing Guido Chelazzi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles