World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
4975
World Ranking
9442
National Ranking
3991

Malcolm N. Semple publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm N. Semple sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 62 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Malcolm N. Semple D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm N. Semple sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Malcolm N. Semple is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their academic profile lacks specific details regarding recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications. There is also no information available about their main fields or subfields of study, nor about the primary topics of research they have covered.

No awards or distinctions have been recorded in the available data, and there is no indication of the scientist being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Auditory Temporal Processing: Responses to Sinusoidally Amplitude-Modulated Tones in the Inferior Colliculus

    B. Suresh Krishna;Malcolm N. Semple

  • Monaural inhibition in cat auditory cortex.

    M. B. Calford;M. N. Semple

  • Representation of sound frequency and laterality by units in central nucleus of cat inferior colliculus

    M. N. Semple;L. M. Aitkin

  • Redefining the tonotopic core of rat auditory cortex: physiological evidence for a posterior field.

    Neot N. Doron;Joseph E. Ledoux;Malcolm N. Semple

  • Neurons sensitive to interaural phase disparity in gerbil superior olive: diverse monaural and temporal response properties.

    M. W. Spitzer;M. N. Semple

  • Transformation of temporal properties between auditory midbrain and cortex in the awake Mongolian gerbil.

    Maria Ter-Mikaelian;Dan H. Sanes;Malcolm N. Semple

  • Level-dependent representation of stimulus frequency in cat primary auditory cortex

    D. P. Phillips;M. N. Semple;M. B. Calford;L. M. Kitzes

  • Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus: different consequences of contralateral and ipsilateral auditory stimulation

    M. N. Semple;L. M. Kitzes

  • Development of ectopic projections from the ventral cochlear nucleus to the superior olivary complex induced by neonatal ablation of the contralateral cochlea.

    Leonard M. Kitzes;Glenn H. Kageyama;Malcolm N. Semple;Jonathan Kil

  • Context-Dependent Adaptive Coding of Interaural Phase Disparity in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Macaques

    Brian J. Malone;Brian H. Scott;Malcolm N. Semple

  • Transformation of Binaural Response Properties in the Ascending Auditory Pathway: Influence of Time-Varying Interaural Phase Disparity

    Matthew W. Spitzer;Malcolm N. Semple

  • Factors Shaping the Tone Level Sensitivity of Single Neurons in Posterior Field of Cat Auditory-Cortex

    D. P. Phillips;M. N. Semple;L. M. Kitzes

  • Development of ventral cochlear nucleus projections to the superior olivary complex in gerbil.

    Jonathan Kil;Glenn Hkageyama;Malcolm N. Semple;Leonard M. Kitzes

  • Interaural phase coding in auditory midbrain: influence of dynamic stimulus features.

    Matthew W. Spitzer;Malcolm N. Semple

  • Binaural processing of sound pressure level in cat primary auditory cortex: evidence for a representation based on absolute levels rather than interaural level differences

    M. N. Semple;L. M. Kitzes

  • Spatial receptive-fields in the cat inferior colliculus

    Malcolm N. Semple;Lindsay M. Aitkin;Michael B. Calford;John D. Pettigrew

  • Binaural processing of sound pressure level in the inferior colliculus

    M. N. Semple;L. M. Kitzes

  • Dynamic amplitude coding in the auditory cortex of awake rhesus macaques.

    Brian J. Malone;Brian H. Scott;Brian H. Scott;Malcolm N. Semple

  • Effects of Auditory Stimulus Context on the Representation of Frequency in the Gerbil Inferior Colliculus

    B. J. Malone;M. N. Semple

  • Focal selectivity for binaural sound pressure level in cat primary auditory cortex: Two-Way Intensity Network tuning

    M. N. Semple;L. M. Kitzes

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan H. Sanes
Dan H. Sanes New York University
John Rinzel
John Rinzel New York University
Josef P. Rauschecker
Josef P. Rauschecker Georgetown University Medical Center
Albert S. Berrebi
Albert S. Berrebi West Virginia University
David McAlpine
David McAlpine Macquarie University
Michael B. Calford
Michael B. Calford Australian National University
Eliot A. Brenowitz
Eliot A. Brenowitz University of Washington
Elvira Brattico
Elvira Brattico Aarhus University
Isabelle Peretz
Isabelle Peretz University of Montreal
Alan Stein
Alan Stein University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience students often explore related fields to broaden their career options and skill sets. Social work and psychology programs are popular choices, offering different perspectives on behavior and mental health. For those interested in affordable options, cheap online msw programs provide accessible pathways to a career in social work while minimizing debt.

If you want to specialize in behavioral analysis, earning a bcba degree (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) can open doors to roles in educational, clinical, and community settings. Many students also seek accelerated programs to fast-track their careers. For example, accelerated social work programs and accelerated psychology degree options allow you to complete your studies more quickly, often with flexible online coursework.

These alternative degree pathways can enhance your understanding of human behavior and neuropsychology, while opening up diverse career prospects in healthcare, research, counseling, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm N. Semple

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles