World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7199
World Ranking
5467
National Ranking
2020

Luc L. Lavier publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc L. Lavier sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 179 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Luc L. Lavier D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc L. Lavier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luc L. Lavier is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their primary research area is within Earth and Planetary Sciences, contributing extensively to related disciplines including Geophysics, Geology, Atmospheric Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Mechanics of Materials.

Their scholarly work focuses on topics such as earthquake and tectonic studies, geological and geochemical analysis, high-pressure geophysics and materials, seismic waves and analysis, geological and geophysical studies, geology and paleoclimatology research, and geochemistry and geologic mapping.

Luc L. Lavier has published in a variety of academic venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Geophysical Research Letters

They have collaborated frequently with researchers including James Biemiller, Manon Bickert, Mathilde Cannat, Laura Wallace, and Andréa Tommasi.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Luc L. Lavier include:

  • How do detachment faults form at ultraslow mid-ocean ridges in a thick axial lithosphere?, 2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Physical conditions and frictional properties in the source region of a slow-slip event, 2021, Nature Geoscience
  • Strain Localization in the Root of Detachment Faults at a Melt-Starved Mid-Ocean Ridge: A Microstructural Study of Abyssal Peridotites From the Southwest Indian Ridge, 2021, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
  • Mechanical Implications of Creep and Partial Coupling on the World's Fastest Slipping Low-Angle Normal Fault in Southeastern Papua New Guinea, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • The Mechanics of Creep, Slow Slip Events, and Earthquakes in Mixed Brittle-Ductile Fault Zones, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth

Best Publications

  • A mechanism to thin the continental lithosphere at magma-poor margins

    Luc L. Lavier;Gianreto Manatschal

  • Evolving force balance during incipient subduction

    Michael Gurnis;Chad Hall;Luc Lavier;Luc Lavier

  • Catastrophic initiation of subduction following forced convergence across fracture zones

    Chad E. Hall;Michael Gurnis;Maria Sdrolias;Luc L. Lavier

  • Modes of faulting at mid-ocean ridges

    W. Roger Buck;Luc L. Lavier;Luc L. Lavier;Alexei N. B. Poliakov

  • Tectonosedimentary evolution related to extreme crustal thinning ahead of a propagating ocean: Example of the western Pyrenees

    Suzon Jammes;Gianreto Manatschal;Luc L Lavier;Emmanuel Masini

  • Self-consistent rolling-hinge model for the evolution of large-offset low-angle normal faults

    Luc L. Lavier;W. Roger Buck;Alexei N. B. Poliakov

  • Factors controlling normal fault offset in an ideal brittle layer

    Luc L. Lavier;W. Roger Buck;Alexei N. B. Poliakov

  • Numerical models of crustal scale convection and partial melting beneath the Altiplano–Puna plateau

    A. Yu Babeyko;S. V. Sobolev;R. B. Trumbull;O. Oncken

  • The role of inheritance in structuring hyperextended rift systems: Some considerations based on observations and numerical modeling

    Gianreto Manatschal;Luc Lavier;Pauline Chenin

  • Climatic and tectonic control on the Cenozoic evolution of the West African margin

    Luc L Lavier;Luc L Lavier;Michael S Steckler;Frédéric Brigaud

  • Crustal-scale seismic profiles across the Manila subduction zone: The transition from intraoceanic subduction to incipient collision

    Daniel H. Eakin;Kirk D. McIntosh;H. J.A. Van Avendonk;Luc Lavier

  • Rifting and magmatism in the northeastern South China Sea from wide‐angle tomography and seismic reflection imaging

    Ryan Lester;Harm J. A. Van Avendonk;Kirk McIntosh;Luc Lavier

  • Inversion of a hyper-extended rifted margin in the Southern Central Range of Taiwan

    Kirk D McIntosh;Harm J Van Avendonk;Luc L Lavier;W. Ryan Lester

  • Crustal structure and inferred rifting processes in the northeast South China Sea

    Kirk D McIntosh;Luc L Lavier;Harm J Van Avendonk;Ryan Lester

  • Half graben versus large‐offset low‐angle normal fault: Importance of keeping cool during normal faulting

    Luc L. Lavier;W. Roger Buck

  • How to make a rift wide

    W. Roger Buck;Luc L. Lavier;Alexei N. B. Poliakov

  • Observations from the Alpine Tethys and Iberia–Newfoundland margins pertinent to the interpretation of continental breakup

    G. Manatschal;O. Müntener;Luc L Lavier;T. A. Minshull

  • Seismic evidence of hyper-stretched crust and mantle exhumation offshore Vietnam

    D. Savva;F. Meresse;M. Pubellier;N. Chamot-Rooke

  • Triggering mechanism and tsunamogenic potential of the Cape Fear Slide complex, U.S. Atlantic margin

    Matthew J. Hornbach;Luc L. Lavier;Carolyn D. Ruppel

  • On spreading modes and magma supply at slow and ultraslow mid-ocean ridges

    Mathilde Cannat;Daniel Sauter;Luc Lavier;Manon Bickert

  • Extension of continental crust at the margin of the eastern Grand Banks, Newfoundland

    Harm J.A. Van Avendonk;Luc L. Lavier;Donna J. Shillington;Gianreto Manatschal

Frequent Co-Authors

Gianreto Manatschal
Gianreto Manatschal University of Strasbourg
Francis T. Wu
Francis T. Wu Binghamton University
Laura M. Wallace
Laura M. Wallace The University of Texas at Austin
Mathilde Cannat
Mathilde Cannat Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
W. Roger Buck
W. Roger Buck Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Harm J. A. Van Avendonk
Harm J. A. Van Avendonk The University of Texas at Austin
Char-Shine Liu
Char-Shine Liu National Taiwan University
Ginny A. Catania
Ginny A. Catania The University of Texas at Austin
Michael Gurnis
Michael Gurnis California Institute of Technology
Michael S. Steckler
Michael S. Steckler Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths, ranging from environmental consulting to geological research. For older adults considering a career shift or lifelong learning, best degrees for older adults highlight flexible and accessible programs that fit busy schedules and evolving interests.

Additionally, combining Earth Science knowledge with other specialized fields can enhance job prospects. For instance, pursuing a digital or creative skillset through photography colleges online offers opportunities in environmental documentation and scientific imaging.

For those leaning towards information management and research, understanding if is library science a good career may complement Earth Science by focusing on data organization and archiving. Engaging with accredited programs ensures credibility, especially when exploring options like an ala-accredited program that meets high academic standards.

Overall, exploring these related online degrees can broaden skills and open interdisciplinary opportunities that enhance career growth within and beyond Earth Science.

Best Scientists Citing Luc L. Lavier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles