World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
62
Citations
17695
World Ranking
3199
National Ranking
1819

Lynne M. Reder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne M. Reder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lynne M. Reder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne M. Reder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Lynne M. Reder is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research spans across multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. The core areas of study include cognitive neuroscience, anesthesiology and pain medicine, critical care and intensive care medicine, experimental and cognitive psychology, and developmental neuroscience.

The scientist's work predominantly addresses topics such as memory processes and influences, anesthesia and sedative agents, neural and behavioral psychology studies, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, memory and neural mechanisms, visual and cognitive learning processes, and multisensory perception and integration.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Lynne M. Reder include Vencislav Popov, Keith M. Vogt, James W. Ibinson, Julie A. Fiez, and Caroline M. Norton.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Midazolam and Ketamine Produce Distinct Neural Changes in Memory, Pain, and Fear Networks during Pain (2021), published in Anesthesiology
  • Memory resources recover gradually over time: The effects of word frequency, presentation rate, and list composition on binding errors and mnemonic precision in source memory (2021), published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Familiarity acts as a reduction in objective complexity (2020), published in Memory & Cognition
  • Neutral auditory words immediately followed by painful electric shock may show reduced next-day recollection (2022), published in Experimental Brain Research
  • Effects of Sedative Doses of Propofol, Dexmedetomidine, and Fentanyl on Memory and Pain in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind Crossover Study Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7 Tesla (2025), published in Anesthesiology

Publication venues frequently featuring their work include:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Experimental Brain Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Lynne M. Reder's research contributions are also recognized by their election as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • Situated Learning and Education

    John R. Anderson;Lynne M. Reder;Herbert A. Simon

  • What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.

    Lynne M. Reder;Frank E. Ritter

  • Situative Versus Cognitive Perspectives: Form Versus Substance:

    John R. Anderson;Lynne M Reder;Herbert A Simon

  • Working memory: activation limitations on retrieval.

    John R. Anderson;Lynne M. Reder;Christian Lebiere

  • Strategy-Selection in Question-Answering.

    Lynne M Reder

  • A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model

    Michael S. Ayers;Lynne M. Reder

  • The fan effect: New results and new theories.

    John R. Anderson;Lynne M. Reder

  • A Mechanistic Account of the Mirror Effect for Word Frequency: A Computational Model of Remember-Know Judgments in a Continuous Recognition Paradigm

    Lynne M. Reder;Adisack Nhouyvanisvong;Christian D. Schunn;Michael S. Ayers

  • Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory

    Lynne M. Reder;Christian D. Schunn

  • The Role of Elaboration in the Comprehension and Retention of Prose: A Critical Review

    Lynne M. Reder

  • Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

    Rachel A. Diana;Lynne M. Reder;Jason Arndt;Heekyeong Park

  • A Comparison of Texts and their Summaries: Memorial Consequences.

    Lynne M. Reder;John R. Anderson

  • Implicit Memory and Metacognition

    Lynne M. Reder

  • Plausibility Judgments versus Fact Retrieval: Alternative Strategies for Sentence Verification.

    Lynne M. Reder

  • Perspectives on Learning, Thinking, and Activity:

    John R. Anderson;James G. Greeno;Lynne M. Reder;Herbert A. Simon

  • Modeling Working Memory in a Unified Architecture: An ACT-R Perspective

    Marsha C. Lovett;Lynne M. Reder;Christian Lebiere

  • What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification.

    Patrick Lemaire;Lynne Reder

  • A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: the role of integrating knowledge.

    Lynne M Reder;John R Anderson

  • The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text.

    Lynne M. Reder;Davida H. Charney;Kim I. Morgan

  • The Strategy-Specific Nature of Improvement: The Power Law Applies by Strategy Within Task

    Peter F. Delaney;Lynne M. Reder;James J. Staszewski;Frank E. Ritter

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Anderson
John R. Anderson Carnegie Mellon University
Christian D. Schunn
Christian D. Schunn University of Pittsburgh
Herbert A. Simon
Herbert A. Simon Carnegie Mellon University
Christian Lebiere
Christian Lebiere Carnegie Mellon University
Julie A. Fiez
Julie A. Fiez University of Pittsburgh
Howard J. Aizenstein
Howard J. Aizenstein University of Pittsburgh
Cynthia G. Wible
Cynthia G. Wible Harvard University
Leah L. Light
Leah L. Light Pitzer College
Robert A. Bjork
Robert A. Bjork University of California, Los Angeles
Brian H. Ross
Brian H. Ross University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of impactful career pathways, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. With the rise in demand for mental health professionals, an online psychology degree can prepare you for state-specific licensure and certification requirements.

For example, if you’re interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Jacksonville or becoming a substance abuse counselor in Jersey City, you’ll need to meet unique local educational and licensing criteria. Each state or city may have different pathways, with some requiring supervised clinical hours or additional coursework.

Understanding substance abuse counselor requirements in Kansas City or researching substance abuse counselor requirements in Laredo can help you plan your education and career progression more effectively. Online degrees can offer flexibility and support as you work toward meeting these requirements, setting you up for a rewarding career dedicated to helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Lynne M. Reder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles