World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 64 419 389 198 181 224 20560

Jonathan P. Doh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan P. Doh between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan P. Doh published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2009. 16 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2009. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
1991 2025

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan P. Doh: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 8
2003 5
2004 13
2005 7
2006 6
2007 6
2008 5
2009 31
2010 14
2011 13
2012 14
2013 12
2014 24
2015 12
2016 5
2017 12
2018 3
2019 10
2020 6
2021 15
2022 6
2023 8
2024 7
2025 9
Total 256
Download as CSV

Jonathan P. Doh publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Doh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 220–224 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 224 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37 224
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan P. Doh D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Doh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22 64
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan P. Doh is affiliated with Villanova University in the United States and has a research portfolio primarily situated within the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their scholarly work extends notably into the subfields of Strategy and Management, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research covers multiple core topics, with a focus on International Business and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, Corporate Finance and Governance, Management and Organizational Studies, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Innovation and Socioeconomic Development, and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies.

Jonathan P. Doh has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed publications, many appearing in prominent academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Management Studies
  • Journal of International Business Studies
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of World Business
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their recent published papers include:

  • Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact (2020) in Journal of Management Studies
  • Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research (2021) in Journal of International Business Studies
  • State capitalism in international context: Varieties and variations (2020) in Journal of World Business
  • Long-term energy transitions and international business: Concepts, theory, methods, and a research agenda (2021) in Journal of International Business Studies
  • The impact of multinational enterprises on community informal institutions and rural poverty (2021) in Journal of International Business Studies

Throughout their career, Jonathan P. Doh has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Álvaro Cuervo-Cazurra
  • Sorin Krammer
  • Mirko H. Benischke
  • Daniel Muzio
  • Addisu A. Lashitew

Best Publications

  • Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional‐Stakeholder Perspective

    Jonathan P. Doh;Terrence R. Guay

  • International Management: Culture, Strategy, and Behavior

    Fread Luthans;Jonathan P. Doh

  • The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: an international business research agenda

    Hildy Teegen;Jonathan P Doh;Sushil Vachani

  • Corporate-NGO Collaboration: Co-creating New Business Models for Developing Markets

    Nicolas M. Dahan;Jonathan P. Doh;Jennifer Oetzel;Michael Yaziji

  • Offshore Outsourcing: Implications for International Business and Strategic Management Theory and Practice

    Jonathan P. Doh

  • Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship

    Peter J Buckley;Jonathan P Doh;Mirko H Benischke

  • The Impact of Corruption on Entry Strategy: Evidence from Telecommunication Projects in Emerging Economies

    Klaus Uhlenbruck;Peter Rodriguez;Jonathan Doh;Lorraine Eden

  • Does the Market Respond to an Endorsement of Social Responsibility? The Role of Institutions, Information, and Legitimacy

    Jonathan P. Doh;Shawn D. Howton;Shelly W. Howton;Donald S. Siegel

  • NGOs and Corporations: Conflict and Collaboration

    Michael Yaziji;Jonathan P. Doh

  • Non-Governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications

    Terrence Guay;Jonathan P. Doh;Graham Sinclair

  • International business responses to institutional voids

    Jonathan Doh;Suzana Rodrigues;Ayse Saka-Helmhout;Mona Makhija

  • Can Leadership Be Taught? Perspectives From Management Educators

    Jonathan P. Doh

  • Advancing Nonmarket Strategy Research: Institutional Perspectives in a Changing World

    Jonathan P. Doh;Thomas C. Lawton;Tazeeb Rajwani

  • Coping with corruption in foreign markets

    Jonathan P. Doh;Peter Rodriguez;Klaus Uhlenbruck;Jamie Collins

  • Responsible Leadership and Stakeholder Management: Influence Pathways and Organizational Outcomes

    Jonathan P. Doh;Narda R. Quigley

  • Stakeholder Pressures as Determinants of CSR Strategic Choice: Why do Firms Choose Symbolic Versus Substantive Self-Regulatory Codes of Conduct?

    Luis A. Perez-Batres;Jonathan P. Doh;Van V. Miller;Michael J. Pisani

  • Exploring talent management in India: The neglected role of intrinsic rewards

    Walter G. Tymon;Stephen A. Stumpf;Jonathan P. Doh

  • The high impact of collaborative social initiatives

    John A. Pearce;Jonathan P. Doh

  • Separable but not equal: The location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities

    Jonathan P Doh;Kraiwinee Bunyaratavej;Eugene D Hahn

  • The “Transmutation” of the Organization:: Toward a More Spiritual Workplace

    Gregory A. Gull;Jonathan Doh

Frequent Co-Authors

Tazeeb Rajwani
Tazeeb Rajwani University of Surrey
Stephen A. Stumpf
Stephen A. Stumpf Villanova University
Alan M. Rugman
Alan M. Rugman University of Reading
Fred Luthans
Fred Luthans University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Bryan W. Husted
Bryan W. Husted Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education
John A. Pearce
John A. Pearce Eastern University
Ram Mudambi
Ram Mudambi Temple University
Geoffrey Wood
Geoffrey Wood University of Western Ontario
Lorraine Eden
Lorraine Eden Texas A&M University
Mike Wright
Mike Wright Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of Business and Management evolves, students can now choose from a diverse range of online degrees to fit their career goals. Many universities across the USA offer flexible programs designed for working professionals and recent graduates alike.

Accountancy remains a popular choice, with the most affordable online accounting degree options helping students develop foundational financial skills sought after in business careers. For those interested in technology, ai online degrees are rapidly growing in relevance, providing expertise that is crucial for modern business analytics, automation, and decision-making.

Specializations are available beyond traditional business degrees. A construction management online degree equips students with business and project management know-how specific to the booming construction industry. Meanwhile, professionals aiming for leadership roles can consider an affordable online executive mba program, which focuses on advanced strategic and managerial skills.

Exploring these online degree pathways allows you to tailor your expertise and enhance your employment prospects across a dynamic and competitive business landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan P. Doh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles