World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
10077
World Ranking
2679
National Ranking
1071

Jens Redemann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Redemann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 377 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jens Redemann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Redemann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Redemann is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States and focuses primarily on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences within the atmospheric science domain.

The researcher's work extensively covers atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and atmospheric ozone and climate. Additional topics within their research include atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, air quality and health impacts, aeolian processes and effects, and climate variability and models.

The scientist has published numerous articles in leading scientific journals, with frequent contributions to Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Other notable venues include Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Environmental Science & Technology, Geophysical Research Letters, and Communications Earth & Environment.

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Communications Earth & Environment

Redemann collaborates regularly with a number of co-authors, including Paquita Zuidema, Connor Flynn, Samuel LeBlanc, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, and Y. Shinozuka.

  • Paquita Zuidema
  • Connor Flynn
  • Samuel LeBlanc
  • Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer
  • Y. Shinozuka

Recent publications by Jens Redemann include:

  • "An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin", 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "The CLoud-Aerosol-Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign", 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of biomass-burning aerosols over the southeast Atlantic (SEA) and its sensitivity to absorbing properties: a regional climate modeling study", 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Biomass burning aerosol as a modulator of the droplet number in the southeast Atlantic region", 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Modeling the smoky troposphere of the southeast Atlantic: a comparison to ORACLES airborne observations from September of 2016", 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Best Publications

  • Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition

    P. B. Russell;R. W. Bergstrom;Y. Shinozuka;A. D. Clarke

  • Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric aerosols

    Robert W. Bergstrom;Peter Pilewskie;Philip B. Russell;Jens Redemann

  • Evaluation of the MODIS Aerosol Retrievals over Ocean and Land during CLAMS

    R. C. Levy;L. A. Remer;J. V. Martins;Y. J. Kaufman

  • Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic: Upcoming Field Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol’s Impact on Climate

    Paquita Zuidema;Jens Redemann;James M. Haywood;Robert Wood

  • An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin

    Jens Redemann;Robert Wood;Paquita Zuidema;Sarah J. Doherty

  • Planning, implementation, and scientific goals of the studies of emissions and atmospheric composition, clouds and climate coupling by regional surveys (SEAC4RS) field mission

    Owen B. Toon;Hal Maring;Jack E. Dibb;Richard Ferrare

  • The North Atlantic Aerosol and Marine Ecosystem Study (NAAMES): Science Motive and Mission Overview

    Michael J. Behrenfeld;Richard H. Moore;Chris A. Hostetler;Jason Graff

  • Retrieval of Aerosol Scattering and Absorption Properties from Photopolarimetric Observations over the Ocean during the CLAMS Experiment

    Jacek Chowdhary;Brian Cairns;Michael I. Mishchenko;Peter V. Hobbs

  • A multiparameter aerosol classification method and its application to retrievals from spaceborne polarimetry

    Philip B. Russell;Meloë Kacenelenbogen;John M. Livingston;Otto P. Hasekamp

  • The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation interaction and forcing: year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign

    Jim M. Haywood;Jim M. Haywood;Steven J. Abel;Paul A. Barrett;Nicolas Bellouin

  • Testing the MODIS Satellite Retrieval of Aerosol Fine-Mode Fraction

    Theodore L. Anderson;Yonghua Wu;D. Allen Chu;D. Allen Chu;Beat Schmid

  • Intercomparison of biomass burning aerosol optical properties from in situ and remote-sensing instruments in ORACLES-2016

    Kristina Pistone;Jens Redemann;Sarah Doherty;Paquita Zuidema

  • An Accuracy Assessment of the CALIOP/CALIPSO Version 2/Version 3 Daytime Aerosol Extinction Product Based on a Detailed Multi-Sensor, Multi-Platform Case Study

    M. Kacenelenbogen;M. A. Vaughan;J. Redemann;R. M. Hoff

  • Coordinated airborne, spaceborne, and ground‐based measurements of massive thick aerosol layers during the dry season in southern Africa

    B. Schmid;J. Redemann;P. B. Russell;P. V. Hobbs

  • Saharan dust transport to the Caribbean during PRIDE: 2. Transport, vertical profiles, and deposition in simulations of in situ and remote sensing observations

    P. R. Colarco;P. R. Colarco;O. B. Toon;J. S. Reid;J. M. Livingston

  • Comparison of Aerosol Single Scattering Albedos Derived by Diverse Techniques in Two North Atlantic Experiments

    P. B. Russell;J. Redemann;B. Schmid;R. W. Bergstrom

  • Sensitivity of Multiangle, Multispectral Polarimetric Remote Sensing Over Open Oceans to Water-Leaving Radiance: Analyses of RSP Data Acquired During the MILAGRO Campaign

    Jacek Chowdhary;Jacek Chowdhary;Brian Cairns;Brian Cairns;Fabien Waquet;Kirk Knobelspiesse;Kirk Knobelspiesse

  • Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of biomass-burning aerosols over the southeast Atlantic (SEA) and its sensitivity to absorbing properties: a regional climate modeling study

    Marc Mallet;Fabien Solmon;Pierre Nabat;Nellie Elguindi

  • Environmental snapshots from ACE-Asia

    Ralph Kahn;Jim Anderson;Theodore L. Anderson;Tim Bates

  • NASA LaRC airborne high spectral resolution lidar aerosol measurements during MILAGRO: observations and validation

    R. R. Rogers;J. W. Hair;C. A. Hostetler;R. A. Ferrare

  • Evaluation of daytime measurements of aerosols and water vapor made by an operational Raman lidar over the Southern Great Plains

    Richard Ferrare;David Turner;Marian Clayton;Beat Schmid

  • Biomass burning aerosol as a modulator of the droplet number in the southeast Atlantic region

    Mary Kacarab;K. Lee Thornhill;Amie Dobracki;Amie Dobracki;Steven G. Howell

  • SAFARI 2000-Southern African Regional Science Initiative : Coordinated airborne, spaceborne, and ground-based measurements of massive thick aerosol layers during the dry season in southern Africa

    B. Schmid;J. Redemann;P. B. Russell;P. V. Hobbs

Frequent Co-Authors

Yohei Shinozuka
Yohei Shinozuka Bay Area Environmental Research Institute
John M. Livingston
John M. Livingston SRI International
Beat Schmid
Beat Schmid Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Philip B. Russell
Philip B. Russell Ames Research Center
Brent N. Holben
Brent N. Holben Goddard Space Flight Center
Sharon Burton
Sharon Burton Langley Research Center
Peter Pilewskie
Peter Pilewskie University of Colorado Boulder
Paquita Zuidema
Paquita Zuidema University of Miami
Antony D. Clarke
Antony D. Clarke University of Hawaii at Manoa
Richard A. Ferrare
Richard A. Ferrare Langley Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in pursuing Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Advanced education options such as doctoral programs online no dissertation offer flexible paths for professionals aiming to deepen their expertise without the traditional dissertation barrier.

Many educators and practitioners consider transitioning from an EdS to EdD program to elevate their qualifications and impact in environmental policy and education fields. Discover more about the eds to edd program options that can align with environmental science career goals.

Social work intersects significantly with environmental health and community resilience, making fully funded online doctorates valuable. Explore fully funded dsw programs online for those looking to integrate social work with environmental advocacy at an advanced level.

For those starting out or seeking cost-effective options, the most affordable online general studies degree programs offer foundational knowledge with flexibility, which can be an excellent stepping stone into specialized environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Redemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles