World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
70
Citations
15853
World Ranking
1699
National Ranking
713

Philip B. Russell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip B. Russell sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 230 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Philip B. Russell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip B. Russell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Philip B. Russell is affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Sociology and Political Science. Their work covers topics related to Arctic and Russian Policy Studies.

Their recent publication record includes the paper titled Arctic Ice Loss Threatens National Security: A Path Forward, published in 2020 in the journal Orbis. This work has been cited 16 times, reflecting ongoing interest within academic and policy communities on the subject of Arctic environmental changes and their implications for national security.

Philip B. Russell has collaborated with several coauthors throughout their career. Frequent collaborators include:

  • A. W. Strawa
  • Gary Latshaw
  • Stanley Farkas
  • S. Zornetzer

Their publications have appeared in venues such as:

  • Orbis

The primary topics explored in their work focus on:

  • Arctic and Russian Policy Studies

Philip B. Russell received recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2005.

Best Publications

  • An overview of ACE-Asia: Strategies for quantifying the relationships between Asian aerosols and their climatic impacts

    Barry J. Huebert;Timothy Bates;Philip B. Russell;Guangyu Shi

  • Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition

    P. B. Russell;R. W. Bergstrom;Y. Shinozuka;A. D. Clarke

  • Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric aerosols

    Robert W. Bergstrom;Peter Pilewskie;Philip B. Russell;Jens Redemann

  • Wavelength Dependence of the Absorption of Black Carbon Particles: Predictions and Results from the TARFOX Experiment and Implications for the Aerosol Single Scattering Albedo

    Robert W. Bergstrom;Philip B. Russell;Phillip Hignett

  • Lidar measurement of particles and gases by elastic backscattering and differential absorption

    R. T. H. Collis;P. B. Russell

  • An overview of the MILAGRO 2006 Campaign: Mexico City emissions and their transport and transformation

    L. T. Molina;S. Madronich;J. S. Gaffney;E. Apel

  • The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results

    Daniel James Jacob;J. H. Crawford;H. Maring;A. D. Clarke

  • ACE-ASIA Regional Climatic and Atmospheric Chemical Effects of Asian Dust and Pollution

    John H. Seinfeld;Gregory R. Carmichael;Richard Arimoto;William C. Conant

  • Methodology for error analysis and simulation of lidar aerosol measurements

    Russell Pb;Swissler Tj;McCormick Mp

  • Pharmaceutical and personal care products in groundwater, subsurface drainage, soil, and wheat grain, following a high single application of municipal biosolids to a field

    N. Gottschall;E. Topp;C. Metcalfe;M. Edwards

  • Chemical apportionment of aerosol column optical depth off the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States

    Dean A. Hegg;John Livingston;Peter V. Hobbs;T. Novakov

  • Global to microscale evolution of the Pinatubo volcanic aerosol derived from diverse measurements and analyses

    P. B. Russell;J. M. Livingston;R. F. Pueschel;J. J. Bauman

  • Aerosol properties and radiative effects in the United States East Coast haze plume: An overview of the Tropospheric Aerosol Radiative Forcing Observational Experiment (TARFOX)

    Philip B. Russell;Peter V. Hobbs;Larry L. Stowe

  • Pinatubo and pre-Pinatubo optical-depth spectra: Mauna Loa measurements, comparisons, inferred particle size distributions, radiative effects, and relationship to lidar data

    P. B. Russell;J. M. Livingston;E. G. Dutton;R. F. Pueschel

  • Overview of the Summer 2004 Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment–North America (INTEX-A)

    Hanwant B. Singh;W. H. Brune;J. H. Crawford;D. J. Jacob

  • International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation (ICARTT): North America to Europe—Overview of the 2004 summer field study

    Fred C. Fehsenfeld;Gérard Ancellet;Timothy S. Bates;A. H. Goldstein

  • Forcings and chaos in interannual to decadal climate change

    J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;A. Lacis

  • Aerosol-induced radiative flux changes off the United States mid-Atlantic coast: Comparison of values calculated from sunphotometer and in situ data with those measured by airborne pyranometer

    P. B. Russell;J. M. Livingston;P. Hignett;S. Kinne

  • Evaluation of the Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) retrievals of dust aerosol over the ocean during PRIDE

    Robert C. Levy;Lorraine A. Remer;Didier Tanré;Yoram J. Kaufman

  • Analysis of measurements of Saharan dust by airborne and ground-based remote sensing methods during the Puerto Rico Dust Experiment (PRIDE)

    Jeffrey S. Reid;James E. Kinney;Douglas L. Westphal;Brent N. Holben

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Livingston
John M. Livingston SRI International
Jens Redemann
Jens Redemann University of Oklahoma
Brent N. Holben
Brent N. Holben Goddard Space Flight Center
Peter Pilewskie
Peter Pilewskie University of Colorado Boulder
Beat Schmid
Beat Schmid Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Hal Maring
Hal Maring National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Lorraine A. Remer
Lorraine A. Remer University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Sundar A. Christopher
Sundar A. Christopher University of Alabama in Huntsville
Jeffrey S. Reid
Jeffrey S. Reid United States Naval Research Laboratory
Ellsworth J. Welton
Ellsworth J. Welton Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career options and enhance expertise. Programs like online geoscience degree courses provide a strong foundation in earth systems, complementing environmental studies with a focus on geology and natural resources.

Many students also consider flexible and affordable options, such as an online general studies degree affordable program, which allows learners to tailor courses toward specific environmental interests while managing costs effectively.

For those aiming to advance toward leadership or policy-driven roles in social and environmental contexts, pursuing a dsw online programs can be a strategic step. These programs address social dimensions of environmental challenges and promote community-focused solutions.

Additionally, some students prefer programs recognized as the easiest bachelor degree options to balance workload while gaining essential skills for environmental careers. Choosing the right program depends on career goals, budget, and time commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Philip B. Russell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles