World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
30235
World Ranking
13106
National Ranking
186

Stefan T. Engelter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan T. Engelter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 394 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stefan T. Engelter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan T. Engelter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan T. Engelter is affiliated with the University Hospital of Basel in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with specific expertise in epidemiology, neurology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and internal medicine.

Their work extensively covers several key topics in clinical and medical research including acute ischemic stroke management, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, intracranial aneurysms treatment and complications, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, and intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research.

Stefan T. Engelter has published significantly in multiple renowned scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include European Stroke Journal, Stroke, Annals of Neurology, Frontiers in Neurology, and Neurology.

Examples of recent papers authored or coauthored by Engelter demonstrate the breadth of their research focus:

  • Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • ESO guideline for the management of extracranial and intracranial artery dissection, 2021, European Stroke Journal
  • Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial, 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • Prior Anticoagulation in Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke-A Delphi Study, 2020, Frontiers in Neurology

The scientist collaborates frequently with several colleagues, reflecting an extensive research network. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Lyrer, Alexandros A. Polymeris, David Seiffge, Henrik Gensicke, and Gian Marco De Marchis.

The focus on studies related to stroke, vascular diseases, and anticoagulation therapy aligns with the list of major research topics and fields of study attributed to Stefan T. Engelter. Their publications contribute to the understanding and management of neurological and cardiovascular conditions with a focus on clinical outcomes and guidelines.

Best Publications

  • Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for Stroke

    Joseph P Broderick;Yuko Y Palesch;Andrew M Demchuk;Sharon D Yeatts

  • Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial

    Jörg Ederle;Joanna Dobson;Joanna Dobson;Roland L. Featherstone;Leo H. Bonati;Leo H. Bonati

  • Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis

    Stefan T. Engelter;Michal Gostynski;Susanna Papa;Maya Frei

  • Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry study.

    Wouter J. Schonewille;Christine A. C. Wijman;Patrik Michel;Christina M. Rueckert

  • New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS)

    Leo H Bonati;Leo H Bonati;Lisa M Jongen;Sven Haller;H Zwenneke Flach

  • Effect of a Novel Free Radical Scavenger, Edaravone (MCI-186), on Acute Brain Infarction

    Wolfgang Müllges;Dorothea Franke;Wilko Reents;Jörg Babin-Ebell

  • Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial

    Leo H Bonati;Leo H Bonati;Joanna Dobson;Roland L Featherstone;Jörg Ederle

  • Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection

    Philippe A Lyrer;Stefan T Engelter

  • Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection

    Stéphanie Debette;Stéphanie Debette;Annette Compter;Marc-Antoine Labeyrie;Maarten Uyttenboogaart

  • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis: The SEDAN Score

    Daniel Strbian;Stefan Engelter;Patrik Michel;Atte Meretoja

  • Copeptin: A novel, independent prognostic marker in patients with ischemic stroke

    Mira Katan;Felix Fluri;Nils G Morgenthaler;Philipp Schuetz

  • Antiplatelets Versus Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection

    Stefan T. Engelter;Tobias Brandt;Stéphanie Debette;Valeria Caso

  • Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520,000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes

    Rainer Malik;Ganesh Chauhan;Matthew Traylor;Muralidharan Sargurupremraj

  • Statin Therapy and Outcome After Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Trials

    Danielle Ní Chróinín;Kjell Asplund;Signild Åsberg;Elizabeth Callaly

  • Predicting outcome of IV thrombolysis–treated ischemic stroke patients The DRAGON score

    D. Strbian;A. Meretoja;F.J. Ahlhelm;J. Pitkäniemi

  • Differential features of carotid and vertebral artery dissections: The CADISP Study

    S. Debette;C. Grond-Ginsbach;M. Bodenant;M. Kloss

  • Safety of Thrombolysis in Stroke Mimics Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study

    Sanne M. Zinkstok;Stefan T. Engelter;Henrik Gensicke;Philippe A. Lyrer

  • Common variation in PHACTR1 is associated with susceptibility to cervical artery dissection

    Stéphanie Debette;Yoichiro Kamatani;Tiina M. Metso;Manja Kloss

  • Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients of >=80 versus <80 years of age: a systematic review across cohort studies

    Stefan T. Engelter;Leo H. Bonati;Philippe A. Lyrer

  • Etiology of first-ever ischaemic stroke in European young adults: the 15 cities young stroke study

    N. Yesilot Barlas;J. Putaala;U. Waje-Andreassen;S. Vassilopoulou

Frequent Co-Authors

Turgut Tatlisumak
Turgut Tatlisumak University of Gothenburg
Patrik Michel
Patrik Michel University of Lausanne
Marcel Arnold
Marcel Arnold University of Bern
Vincent Thijs
Vincent Thijs Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Urs Fischer
Urs Fischer University of Basel
Didier Leys
Didier Leys University of Lille
Valeria Caso
Valeria Caso University of Perugia
Heinrich Mattle
Heinrich Mattle University of Bern
Martin M. Brown
Martin M. Brown University College London
Andreas Luft
Andreas Luft University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring healthcare education in the USA now includes a variety of flexible online pathways. Whether you're looking to enhance your credentials or fast-track your entry into the field, online medical degrees offer compelling, accessible options.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, rn to bsn online programs without clinicals are a practical way to boost qualifications without stepping away from work. Licensed practical nurses looking for rapid entry can consider a 6 month lpn program to quickly gain essential skills.

For nurses pursuing specialist or leadership roles, doctoral programs are evolving, too. Busy professionals may benefit from the shortest dnp program online for efficient progression. Additionally, those seeking a less research-intensive path can explore dnp programs without dissertation, streamlining the process while maintaining professional standards.

Whether you’re advancing in nursing or starting a medical career, these online programs provide diverse opportunities tailored to your needs, balancing flexibility, speed, and depth of study.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan T. Engelter

Trending Scientists