World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
62
Citations
16328
World Ranking
2961
National Ranking
1295

Lawrence B. Schook publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence B. Schook sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 299 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Lawrence B. Schook D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence B. Schook sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Lawrence B. Schook is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Epidemiology, and Hepatology.

Their recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research, 2020, GigaScience
  • Epigenetic clock and DNA methylation analysis of porcine models of aging and obesity, 2021, GeroScience
  • Transarterial Embolization of Liver Cancer in a Transgenic Pig Model, 2021, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
  • Staging Liver Fibrosis by Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET in a Human-Sized Swine Model, 2022, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Electrothermal soft manipulator enabling safe transport and handling of thin cell/tissue sheets and bioelectronic devices, 2020, Science Advances

They frequently collaborate with other researchers, including:

  • Kyle M. Schachtschneider
  • Ron C. Gaba
  • Lobna Elkhadragy
  • Hooman Yarmohammadi
  • Stephen B. Solomon

Their work has been published predominantly in several venues, reflecting their multidisciplinary research approach. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Mammalian Genome
  • PLoS ONE

The main topics of their research encompass:

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Lawrence B. Schook has been recognized with the award of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution

    Martien A. M. Groenen;Alan L. Archibald;Hirohide Uenishi;Christopher K. Tuggle

  • The Genome Sequence of Taurine Cattle: A Window to Ruminant Biology and Evolution

    Christine G. Elsik;Christine G. Elsik;Christine G. Elsik;Ross L. Tellam;Kim C. Worley;Kim C. Worley;Richard A. Gibbs

  • Design of a High Density SNP Genotyping Assay in the Pig Using SNPs Identified and Characterized by Next Generation Sequencing Technology

    António M Ramos;Richard P M A Crooijmans;Nabeel A Affara;Andreia J. Amaral

  • Construction of a whole-genome radiation hybrid panel for high-resolution gene mapping in pigs.

    M. Yerle;P. Pinton;A. Robic;A. Alfonso

  • Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps

    William J. Murphy;Denis M. Larkin;Annelie Everts-Van Der Wind;Guillaume Bourque

  • An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research

    Amanda Warr;Nabeel Affara;Bronwen Aken;Hamid Beiki

  • A first-generation porcine whole-genome radiation hybrid map.

    Rachel J. Hawken;Jeremy Murtaugh;Gail H. Flickinger;Martine Yerle

  • IMpRH Server: an RH mapping server available on the Web

    Denis Milan;Rachel Hawken;Cédric Cabau;Sophie Leroux

  • Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: consequence of demography and the recombination landscape.

    Mirte Bosse;Hendrik Jan Megens;Ole Madsen;Yogesh Paudel

  • Mechanisms generating functionally heterogeneous macrophages: chaos revisited.

    Mark S. Rutherford;Alice Witsell;Lawrence B. Schook

  • Pig genome sequence - analysis and publication strategy

    Alan L. Archibald;Lars Bolund;Carol Churcher;Merete Fredholm

  • Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus

    Laurent A.F. Frantz;Joshua G. Schraiber;Ole Madsen;Hendrik Jan Megens

  • A genomic scan of porcine reproductive traits reveals possible quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for number of corpora lutea

    P. J. Wilkie;A. A. Paszek;C. W. Beattie;L. J. Alexander

  • Activation of adenosine A3 receptors on macrophages inhibits tumor necrosis factor-α

    Charlene D. McWhinney;Mark W. Dudley;Terry L. Bowlin;Norton P. Peet

  • A high density recombination map of the pig reveals a correlation between sex-specific recombination and GC content

    Flavie Tortereau;Flavie Tortereau;Bertrand Servin;Laurent Frantz;Hendrik Jan Megens

  • A high utility integrated map of the pig genome

    Sean J Humphray;Carol E Scott;Richard Clark;Brandy Marron

  • Swine in biomedical research: creating the building blocks of animal models.

    Lawrence B. Schook;Craig W. Beattie;Jonathan Beever;Sharon M. Donovan

  • Genetic resources, genome mapping and evolutionary genomics of the pig (Sus scrofa).

    Kefei Chen;Tara Baxter;William M. Muir;Martien A. Groenen

  • Twists and turns in the development and maintenance of the mammalian small intestine epithelium.

    Andrew L. Hauck;Kelly S. Swanson;Paul J. A. Kenis;Deborah E. Leckband

  • Dynamics of Mammalian ChromosomeEvolutionInferredfrom Multispecies Comparative Maps

    William J. Murphy;Denis M. Larkin;Annelie Everts-van der Wind;Guillaume Bourque

Frequent Co-Authors

Martien A. M. Groenen
Martien A. M. Groenen Wageningen University & Research
Alan Archibald
Alan Archibald University of Edinburgh
Hendrik-Jan Megens
Hendrik-Jan Megens Wageningen University & Research
Richard P. M. A. Crooijmans
Richard P. M. A. Crooijmans Wageningen University & Research
Gary A. Rohrer
Gary A. Rohrer Agricultural Research Service
Kelly S. Swanson
Kelly S. Swanson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ole Madsen
Ole Madsen Wageningen University & Research
Harris A. Lewin
Harris A. Lewin University of California, Davis
Christopher M. Counter
Christopher M. Counter Duke University
Joan K. Lunney
Joan K. Lunney Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in Genetics, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career options within healthcare and the sciences. Many students choose online nursing degree programs as a flexible and accessible way to build foundational knowledge in healthcare. These programs are designed to balance study with work or personal commitments, making them an excellent option for busy adults.

For those aiming for advanced clinical roles, online nurse practitioner programs offer specialized training, preparing graduates for broader responsibilities in patient care. Another attractive pathway is enrolling in the best dnp programs online, which can qualify you for leadership, research, and teaching positions in nursing.

If you are a registered nurse looking to further your education, understanding the average cost of rn to bsn programs can help you plan your academic journey while staying within budget. By pursuing these pathways, students can combine their interest in genetics with practical healthcare skills, leading to rewarding and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence B. Schook

Trending Scientists