World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
6209
World Ranking
8492
National Ranking
85

Eunil Park publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eunil Park sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 135 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eunil Park D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eunil Park sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eunil Park is affiliated with Sungkyunkwan University in South Korea and has contributed extensively to research in computer science and social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, marketing, and information systems and management.

The scientist's research primarily addresses topics such as digital marketing and social media, technology adoption and user behaviour, sentiment analysis and opinion mining, customer service quality and loyalty, mental health via writing, consumer retail behavior studies, and complex network analysis techniques.

Key recent publications include:

  • A deep learning model for detecting mental illness from user content on social media (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Smart home and internet of things: A bibliometric study (2021, Journal of Cleaner Production)
  • Machine Learning for Mental Health in Social Media: Bibliometric Study (2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • Deep learning model based on expectation-confirmation theory to predict customer satisfaction in hospitality service (2022, Information Technology & Tourism)
  • Who will be your next customer: A machine learning approach to customer return visits in airline services (2020, Journal of Business Research)

Frequent coauthors in Park's research include:

  • Jina Kim
  • Dahye Jeong
  • Hyeongjin Ahn
  • Jinyoung Han
  • Ángel P. del Pobil

Park's work has appeared predominantly in these publication venues:

  • Telematics and Informatics
  • Journal Of Big Data
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

The combination of research fields and topics shows a strong interdisciplinary approach, integrating computational methods and social science theories. Park has addressed areas such as machine learning applications in mental health, consumer behaviour analysis, and the impact of technology adoption on user satisfaction.

Best Publications

  • An Integrated Adoption Model of Mobile Cloud Services: Exploration of Key Determinants and Extension of Technology Acceptance Model

    Eunil Park;Ki Joon Kim

  • Determinants of player acceptance of mobile social network games: An application of extended technology acceptance model

    Eunil Park;Seoin Baek;Jay Ohm;Hyun Joon Chang

  • Comprehensive Approaches to User Acceptance of Internet of Things in a Smart Home Environment

    Eunil Park;Yongwoo Cho;Jinyoung Han;Sang Jib Kwon

  • A deep learning model for detecting mental illness from user content on social media.

    Jina Kim;Jina Kim;Jieon Lee;Eunil Park;Jinyoung Han

  • Caregiving role in human–robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence

    Ki Joon Kim;Eunil Park;S. Shyam Sundar;S. Shyam Sundar

  • User acceptance of smart wearable devices: An expectation-confirmation model approach

    Eunil Park

  • The Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in Smart Cities: Technology Roadmap-oriented Approaches

    Eunil Park;Angel P. Del Pobil;Sang Jib Kwon

  • Smart home services as the next mainstream of the ICT industry: determinants of the adoption of smart home services

    Eunil Park;Sunghyun Kim;Youngseok Kim;Sang Jib Kwon

  • User acceptance of long‐term evolution (LTE) services: An application of extended technology acceptance model

    Eunil Park;Ki Joon Kim

  • An adoption model for virtual reality games: The roles of presence and enjoyment

    Yeon Ju Jang;Eunil Park

  • Understanding driver adoption of car navigation systems using the extended technology acceptance model

    Eunil Park;Heetae Kim;Jay Y. Ohm

  • Smart home and internet of things: A bibliometric study

    Wonyoung Choi;Jisu Kim;SangEun Lee;Eunil Park

  • Machine Learning for Mental Health in Social Media: Bibliometric Study

    Jina Kim;Daeun Lee;Eunil Park

  • Understanding customers' hotel revisiting behaviour: a sentiment analysis of online feedback reviews.

    Eunil Park;Jiwon Kang;Daejin Choi;Jinyoung Han

  • Understanding the emergence of wearable devices as next-generation tools for health communication

    Eunil Park;Ki Joon Kim;Sang Jib Kwon

  • Technology Acceptance Model for the Use of Tablet PCs

    Eunil Park;Angel P. Pobil

  • The effects of screen-size and communication modality on psychology of mobile device users

    Ki Joon Kim;S. Shyam Sundar;Eunil Park

  • Determinants of customer satisfaction with airline services: an analysis of customer feedback big data.

    Eunil Park;Yeonju Jang;Jina Kim;Nam Jeong Jeong

  • Beyond coolness: Predicting the technology adoption of interactive wearable devices

    Jina Kim;Eunil Park

  • Factors influencing users' employment of mobile map services

    Eunil Park;Jay Ohm

  • Driver acceptance of car navigation systems: integration of locational accuracy, processing speed, and service and display quality with technology acceptance model

    Eunil Park;Ki Joon Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Angel P. del Pobil
Angel P. del Pobil Jaume I University
Uichin Lee
Uichin Lee Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Dong-Hee Shin
Dong-Hee Shin Zayed University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a range of flexible and affordable pathways for students at every level. Many learners start with an accelerated associate degree online, which can be completed in as little as six months. This approach allows for a quick entry into IT support roles or a stepping stone toward more advanced qualifications.

For those interested in management or entrepreneurship, pursuing a business administration degree online cost comparison can help you find programs that deliver both value and quality. Many universities offer affordable tuition to keep education accessible.

It is also possible to earn the most affordable bachelor's degree online in computer science or related fields. These programs offer the academic depth and flexibility needed for working adults or students looking to minimize debt.

For those drawn to problem-solving and innovation, an engineering online degree can lead to dynamic tech careers. No matter your pathway, online study helps you balance life, work, and career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Eunil Park

Trending Scientists