World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Angel P. del Pobil

Angel P. del Pobil

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
4285
World Ranking
10936
National Ranking
179

Angel P. del Pobil publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angel P. del Pobil sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 273 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Angel P. del Pobil D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angel P. del Pobil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angel P. del Pobil is affiliated with Jaume I University in Spain. Their research spans the fields of Engineering and Computer Science, with significant contributions in subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Marketing.

Their scholarly work prominently addresses topics including Robot Manipulation and Learning, Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization, Customer Service Quality and Loyalty, Soft Robotics and Applications, Robotic Path Planning Algorithms, Digital Marketing and Social Media, and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies.

Angel P. del Pobil has authored multiple papers published in various academic journals. Among the recent papers are:

  • Deep learning model based on expectation-confirmation theory to predict customer satisfaction in hospitality service (2022, Information Technology & Tourism)
  • A deep hybrid learning model for customer repurchase behavior (2020, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services)
  • Can AI be a content generator? Effects of content generators and information delivery methods on the psychology of content consumers (2020, Telematics and Informatics)
  • Determinants of customer brand loyalty in the retail industry: A comparison between national and private brands in South Korea (2021, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services)
  • Design and analysis of a variable-stiffness robotic gripper (2021, Alexandria Engineering Journal)

Their work appears frequently in key publication venues such as:

  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
  • Sensors
  • Journal Of Big Data
  • Information Technology & Tourism
  • Telematics and Informatics

Angel P. del Pobil collaborates regularly with a set of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Eunil Park
  • Soyoung Oh
  • Jina Kim
  • Antonio Morales
  • Ester Martínez-Martín

Best Publications

  • When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: corepresentation of robotic actions.

    Anna Stenzel;Eris Chinellato;Maria A Tirado Bou;Ángel P Del Pobil

  • The Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in Smart Cities: Technology Roadmap-oriented Approaches

    Eunil Park;Angel P. Del Pobil;Sang Jib Kwon

  • Practical Motion Planning in Robotics: Current Approaches and Future Directions

    Kamal Gupta;Angel P. Pobil

  • Vision-based three-finger grasp synthesis constrained by hand geometry

    Antonio Morales;Pedro J. Sanz;Angel P. del Pobil;Andrew H. Fagg

  • Ranking planar grasp configurations for a three-finger hand

    E. Chinellato;R.B. Fisher;A. Morales;A.P. del Pobil

  • Technology Acceptance Model for the Use of Tablet PCs

    Eunil Park;Angel P. Pobil

  • Visual quality measures for Characterizing Planar robot grasps

    E. Chinellato;A. Morales;R.B. Fisher;A.P. del Pobil

  • Determinants of customer satisfaction with airline services: an analysis of customer feedback big data.

    Eunil Park;Yeonju Jang;Jina Kim;Nam Jeong Jeong

  • Tasks and Methods in Applied Artificial Intelligence

    Angel Pasqual del Pobil;J. Mira;Moonis Ali

  • Toward Replicable and Measurable Robotics Research [From the Guest Editors]

    Fabio Bonsignorio;Angel P. del Pobil

  • USING EXPERIENCE FOR ASSESSING GRASP RELIABILITY

    Antonio Morales;Eris Chinellato;Andrew H. Fagg;Angel P. del Pobil

  • Improving Image-Based Visual Servoing with Three-Dimensional Features

    E. Cervera;A. P. del Pobil;F. Berry;P. Martinet

  • The effects of a robot instructor's positive vs. negative feedbacks on attraction and acceptance towards the robot in classroom

    Eunil Park;Ki Joon Kim;Angel P. del Pobil

  • Users' attitudes toward service robots in South Korea

    Eunil Park;Angel P. del Pobil

  • Spatial Representation and Motion Planning

    Angel Pasqual del. Pobil;Miguel Angel. Serna

  • Benchmarks in Robotics Research

    Angel P. del Pobil

  • Modeling the user acceptance of long-term evolution (LTE) services

    Eunil Park;Angel P. del Pobil;Angel P. del Pobil

  • Object Detection and Recognition for Assistive Robots: Experimentation and Implementation

    Ester Martinez-Martin;Angel P. del Pobil

  • The Law of Attraction in Human-Robot Interaction

    Eunil Park;Dallae Jin;Dallae Jin;Angel P. del Pobil;Angel P. del Pobil

  • Vision-tactile-force integration and robot physical interaction

    Mario Prats;Pedro J. Sanz;Angel P. del Pobil

  • Robot Physical Interaction through the combination of Vision, Tactile and Force Feedback: Applications to Assistive Robotics

    Mario Prats;Ángel P. del Pobil;Pedro J. Sanz

Frequent Co-Authors

Eunil Park
Eunil Park Sungkyunkwan University
Markus Lappe
Markus Lappe University of Münster
Philippe Martinet
Philippe Martinet French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Linda B. Smith
Linda B. Smith Indiana University
Roman Liepelt
Roman Liepelt University of Hagen
Patrizia Fattori
Patrizia Fattori University of Bologna
Minoru Asada
Minoru Asada Osaka University
Yiannis Demiris
Yiannis Demiris Imperial College London
Fumiya Iida
Fumiya Iida University of Cambridge
Robert B. Fisher
Robert B. Fisher University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative paths to a career in computer science can open up a variety of opportunities. Many students are now considering specialized programs, such as a electrical engineering degree online admissions process, to broaden their technical skills and career prospects.

If you’re seeking a shortcut to a lucrative job, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These fast-tracked certifications can help you quickly gain credentials and enter high-demand fields without a four-year degree.

For those pursuing graduate studies, the quickest masters degree online options can lead to advanced qualifications in as little as one year. These accelerated programs help fast-track your career advancement while allowing you to study from anywhere.

When choosing the right course, it’s wise to focus on programs with strong market demand. You can explore the most valuable masters degrees to ensure your education leads to meaningful, sustainable job opportunities in the ever-evolving tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Angel P. del Pobil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles