World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
12653
World Ranking
9506
National Ranking
43

Norbert Krüger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norbert Krüger sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 248 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Norbert Krüger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norbert Krüger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Norbert Krüger is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their research encompasses multiple fields of study, primarily within computer science, engineering, and psychology. The main subfields addressed in their work include social psychology, human-computer interaction, control and systems engineering, computer vision and pattern recognition, and artificial intelligence.

The research topics explored by Norbert Krüger center on various aspects of robotics and interactive systems. These include:

  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Robotics and Automated Systems
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Persona Design and Applications

The scholar has contributed to a range of recent publications presented in diverse venues spanning fields related to robotics, human interaction, and control systems. Notable papers include:

  • "Integrative Social Robotics Hands-on," 2020, Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
  • "The SMOOTH-Robot: A Modular, Interactive Service Robot," 2021, Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • "Proactive Control for Online Individual User Adaptation in a Welfare Robot Guidance Scenario: Toward Supporting Elderly People," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • "Multi-view object pose distribution tracking for pre-grasp planning on mobile robots," 2022, 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
  • "Pre-Grasp Approaching on Mobile Robots: A Pre-Active Layered Approach," 2024, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications
  • SN Computer Science
  • Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems

Norbert Krüger's collaboration network features several recurring co-authors. The most frequent among these are:

  • Lakshadeep Naik
  • Leon Bodenhagen
  • Avgi Kollakidou
  • Christian Sønderskov Zarp
  • Eva Hornecker

Best Publications

  • Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching

    L. Wiskott;J.-M. Fellous;N. Kruger;C. von der Malsburg

  • Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching

    Laurenz Wiskott;Jean-Marc Fellous;Norbert Krüger;Christoph von der Malsburg

  • Deep Hierarchies in the Primate Visual Cortex: What Can We Learn for Computer Vision?

    N. Kruger;P. Janssen;S. Kalkan;M. Lappe

  • Face Recognition and Gender determination

    Laurenz Wiskott;Jean-Marc Fellous;Norbert Krüger;Christoph von der Malsburg

  • Object-action complexes: Grounded abstractions of sensory-motor processes

    Norbert Krüger;Christopher W. Geib;Justus H. Piater;Ronald P. A. Petrick

  • Learning Grasp Affordance Densities

    Renaud Detry;Dirk Kraft;Oliver Kroemer;Leon Bodenhagen

  • Determination of face position and pose with a learned representation based on labelled graphs

    N. Krüger;M. Pötzsch;C. von der Malsburg;C. von der Malsburg

  • Adaptation of manipulation skills in physical contact with the environment to reference force profiles

    Fares J. Abu-Dakka;Bojan Nemec;Jimmy A. JØrgensen;Thiusius R. Savarimuthu

  • A strategy for grasping unknown objects based on co-planarity and colour information

    Mila Popović;Dirk Kraft;Leon Bodenhagen;Emre Başeski

  • Pose estimation using local structure-specific shape and appearance context

    Anders Glent Buch;Dirk Kraft;Joni-Kristian Kamarainen;Henrik Gordon Petersen

  • BIRTH OF THE OBJECT: DETECTION OF OBJECTNESS AND EXTRACTION OF OBJECT SHAPE THROUGH OBJECT–ACTION COMPLEXES

    Dirk Kraft;Nicolas Pugeault;Nicolas Pugeault;Emre Baseski;Mila Popovic

  • Collinearity and Parallelism are Statistically Significant Second-Order Relations of Complex Cell Responses

    Norbert Krüger

  • A Simple Ontology of Manipulation Actions Based on Hand-Object Relations

    F. Worgotter;E. E. Aksoy;N. Kruger;J. Piater

  • An algorithm for the learning of weights in discrimination functions using a priori constraints

    N. Kruger

  • Cognitive agents - a procedural perspective relying on the predictability of Object-Action-Complexes (OACs)

    F. Wörgötter;A. Agostini;N. Krüger;N. Shylo

  • Object Action Complexes as an Interface for Planning and Robot Control

    Christopher Geib;Kira Mourao;Ron Petrick;Nico Pugeault

  • Symbols as Self-emergent Entities in an Optimization Process of Feature Extraction and Predictions

    Peter König;Norbert Krüger

  • Learning object-specific grasp affordance densities

    R. Detry;E. Baseski;M. Popovic;Y. Touati

  • A Survey of the Ontogeny of Tool Use: From Sensorimotor Experience to Planning

    Frank Guerin;Norbert Kruger;Dirk Kraft

  • A procedure for automatic analysis of images and image sequences based on two-dimensional shape primitives

    Michael Pötzsch;Norbert Krüger;Christoph von der Malsburg

Frequent Co-Authors

Florentin Wörgötter
Florentin Wörgötter University of Göttingen
Justus Piater
Justus Piater University of Innsbruck
Ales Ude
Ales Ude Jožef Stefan Institute
Tamim Asfour
Tamim Asfour Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Michael Felsberg
Michael Felsberg Linköping University
Markus Lappe
Markus Lappe University of Münster
Danica Kragic
Danica Kragic Royal Institute of Technology
Mark Steedman
Mark Steedman University of Edinburgh
Christoph von der Malsburg
Christoph von der Malsburg Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can open up a wide range of career pathways in technology, engineering, and science. For those looking to accelerate their studies, the fastest computer science degree programs allow students to earn a respected qualification in less time, making it easier to quickly start a new tech career or upskill for advancement.

Beyond computer science, related fields like engineering are also accessible through distance learning. There are several online mechanical engineering degrees and environmental engineer degree online programs designed for working professionals and students seeking flexibility. These programs often provide hands-on learning and the foundational knowledge needed for careers in growing industries.

If you're passionate about education and the environment, you might be interested in unique interdisciplinary roles. There are rewarding jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree, such as environmental educators, curriculum designers, and sustainability coordinators.

No matter your interests, online degrees in computer science and related fields provide flexible pathways to meaningful and future-ready careers.

Best Scientists Citing Norbert Krüger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles