World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
3929
World Ranking
12299
National Ranking
780

Enrico H. Gerding publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico H. Gerding sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 200 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Enrico H. Gerding D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico H. Gerding sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Enrico H. Gerding is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within computer science and engineering, with a focus on areas such as artificial intelligence, statistical and nonlinear physics, management science and operations research, electrical and electronic engineering, and automotive engineering.

Their published work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Auction Theory and Applications

Gerding has contributed papers to several publication venues. The most frequent include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • Energies

Some recent publications authored or co-authored include:

  • "Privacy and Trust in the Internet of Vehicles," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • "Reasoning about responsibility in autonomous systems: challenges and opportunities," 2022, AI & Society
  • "Understanding fraudulent returns and mitigation strategies in multichannel retailing," 2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
  • "Strategies and practices to reduce the ecological impact of product returns: An environmental sustainability framework for multichannel retail," 2023, Business Strategy and the Environment
  • "A Comprehensive Game-Theoretic Model for Electric Vehicle Charging Station Competition," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Throughout their research career, Gerding frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Sebastian Stein
  • Vahid Yazdanpanah
  • Timothy J. Norman
  • Markus Brede
  • Zhongqi Cai

Their work in computer science and engineering, particularly through contributions to artificial intelligence and automotive engineering, reflects engagement with evolving challenges in transportation systems, autonomous technology, and energy management.

Best Publications

  • Evaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition

    Tim Baarslag;Katsuhide Fujita;Enrico H. Gerding;Koen Hindriks

  • Financial news predicts stock market volatility better than close price

    Adam Atkins;Mahesan Niranjan;Enrico Gerding

  • Automated trading with performance weighted random forests and seasonality

    Ash Booth;Enrico Gerding;Frank Mcgroarty

  • Online mechanism design for electric vehicle charging

    Enrico H. Gerding;Valentin Robu;Sebastian Stein;David C. Parkes

  • A model-based online mechanism with pre-commitment and its application to electric vehicle charging

    Sebastian Stein;Enrico Gerding;Valentin Robu;Nicholas R. Jennings

  • Multi-Issue Negotiation Processes by Evolutionary Simulation, Validationand Social Extensions

    Enrico Gerding;David Van Bragt;Han La Poutré

  • Using Gaussian processes to optimise concession in complex negotiations against unknown opponents

    Colin R. Williams;Valentin Robu;Enrico H. Gerding;Nicholas R. Jennings

  • A revenue sharing mechanism for federated search and advertising

    Marco Brambilla;Sofia Ceppi;Nicola Gatti;Enrico H. Gerding

  • Intention-Aware Routing of Electric Vehicles

    Mathijs M. de Weerdt;Sebastian Stein;Enrico H. Gerding;Valentin Robu

  • An online mechanism for multi-unit demand and its application to plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging

    Valentin Robu;Enrico H. Gerding;Sebastian Stein;David C. Parkes

  • Characterizing effective auction mechanisms: insights from the 2007 TAC market design competition

    Jinzhong Niu;Kai Cai;Simon Parsons;Enrico Gerding

  • An Online Mechanism for Multi-Speed Electric Vehicle Charging

    Valentin Robu;Sebastian Stein;Enrico H. Gerding;David C. Parkes

  • Scientific approaches and techniques for negotiation. A game theoretic and artificial intelligence perspective

    Enrico H. Gerding;David D.B. Bragt;J. A. L Poutre

  • JCAT: a platform for the TAC market design competition

    Jinzhong Niu;Kai Cai;Simon Parsons;Enrico Gerding

  • Reward shaping for valuing communications during multi-agent coordination

    Simon A. Williamson;Enrico H. Gerding;Nicholas R. Jennings

  • Two-sided online markets for electric vehicle charging

    Enrico H. Gerding;Sebastian Stein;Valentin Robu;Dengji Zhao

  • Privacy and Trust in the Internet of Vehicles

    Efstathios Zavvos;Enrico H. Gerding;Vahid Yazdanpanah;Carsten Maple

  • Market-based recommendation: Agents that compete for consumer attention

    Sander M. Bohte;Enrico Gerding;Han La Poutré

  • Intention-aware routing to minimise delays at electric vehicle charging stations

    Mathijs M. De Weerdt;Enrico H. Gerding;Sebastian Stein;Valentin Robu

  • A scoring rule-based mechanism for aggregate demand prediction in the smart grid

    Harry Rose;Alex Rogers;Enrico H. Gerding

  • When will negotiation agents be able to represent us? The challenges and opportunities for autonomous negotiators

    Tim Baarslag;Michael Kaisers;Enrico H. Gerding;Catholijn M. Jonker

  • Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Nicola Gatti;Marco Rocco;Sofia Ceppi;Enrico H Gerding

  • Generalised fictitious play for a continuum of anonymous players

    Zinovi Rabinovich;Enrico Gerding;Maria Polukarov;Nicholas R. Jennings

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas R. Jennings
Nicholas R. Jennings Loughborough University
Alex Rogers
Alex Rogers University of Oxford
Valentin Robu
Valentin Robu Eindhoven University of Technology
mc schraefel
mc schraefel University of Southampton
Sarvapali D. Ramchurn
Sarvapali D. Ramchurn University of Southampton
Peter McBurney
Peter McBurney King's College London
Simon Parsons
Simon Parsons University of Lincoln
Catholijn M. Jonker
Catholijn M. Jonker Delft University of Technology
Toby Walsh
Toby Walsh University of New South Wales
Timothy J. Norman
Timothy J. Norman University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your studies beyond computer science can unlock additional opportunities in related STEM fields. If affordability is a top priority, consider exploring the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree programs, which provide a strong foundation in both practical and theoretical skills.

For students interested in interdisciplinary science, pursuing online physics degrees can open doors to numerous research and tech-centric careers. Physics blends problem-solving and analytical skills—critical assets in today’s job market.

The rapidly evolving field of data analytics is also ideal for computer science students aiming to specialize. The cheapest data science degree options allow you to gain expertise in big data, artificial intelligence, and predictive modeling at a lower cost.

If you are considering an advanced credential, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree can further diversify your skillset and career prospects within high-tech industries.

Each of these related online degrees complements the core competencies developed in a computer science program and can help you build a dynamic, future-ready career.

Best Scientists Citing Enrico H. Gerding

Trending Scientists