World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13645 12840 449 438 578 27716

Graham Jackson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Graham Jackson between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Graham Jackson published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2023. 23 of the 684 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2023. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 6 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 31 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 11 publications
1976 2025

684 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Graham Jackson: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 3
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 1
1985 2
1986 0
1987 6
1988 1
1989 6
1990 3
1991 4
1992 3
1993 3
1994 9
1995 3
1996 0
1997 5
1998 4
1999 6
2000 10
2001 13
2002 19
2003 25
2004 31
2005 28
2006 29
2007 21
2008 17
2009 21
2010 22
2011 31
2012 39
2013 23
2014 26
2015 29
2016 26
2017 34
2018 16
2019 26
2020 17
2021 26
2022 26
2023 42
2024 12
2025 11
Total 684
Download as CSV

Graham Jackson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Jackson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 578 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 578
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Graham Jackson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Jackson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Graham Jackson is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia in Australia. Their research has primarily focused on medical and molecular biology fields, contributing notably to hematology, oncology, and genetics.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, the scientist has contributed to several subfields, such as:

  • Hematology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Immunology

The primary research topics pursued involve:

  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research

Graham Jackson has published in several prominent venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Blood
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Blood Cancer Journal
  • British Journal of Haematology

Selected recent papers include:

  • Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma: A European Myeloma Network (EMN) Report Within the HARMONY Project, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Recommendations for vaccination in multiple myeloma: a consensus of the European Myeloma Network, 2020, Leukemia
  • International harmonization in performing and reporting minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma trials, 2020, Leukemia
  • Real-world assessment of the clinical impact of symptomatic infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (COVID-19 disease) in patients with multiple myeloma receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy, 2020, British Journal of Haematology
  • Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone as Induction and Extended Consolidation Improves Outcome in Ultra-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma, 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Among frequent co-authors they have collaborated extensively with are:

  • Gordon Cook
  • Martin Kaiser
  • David A. Cairns
  • Mark T. Drayson
  • Charlotte Pawlyn

Best Publications

  • Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men

    Francesco Montorsi;Ganesan Adaikan;Edgardo Becher;Francois Giuliano

  • Burkitt's lymphoma

    Elizabeth M Molyneux;Rosemary Rochford;Beverly Griffin;Robert Newton

  • First-line treatment with zoledronic acid as compared with clodronic acid in multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): a randomised controlled trial

    Gareth J Morgan;Faith E Davies;Walter M Gregory;Kim Cocks

  • Management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease: recommendations of the Princeton Consensus Panel.

    Robert DeBusk;Yaacov Drory;Irwin Goldstein;Graham Jackson

  • The Princeton III Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease

    Ajay Nehra;Graham Jackson;Martin Miner;Kevin L. Billups

  • Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma

    Brian A. Walker;Eileen M. Boyle;Christopher P. Wardell;Alex Murison

  • A Systematic Review of the Association Between Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease

    Giorgio Gandaglia;Alberto Briganti;Graham Jackson;Robert A. Kloner

  • Minimal Residual Disease Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma: Impact on Outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study

    Andy C. Rawstron;J. Anthony Child;Ruth M. de Tute;Faith E. Davies

  • The role of maintenance thalidomide therapy in multiple myeloma: MRC Myeloma IX results and meta-analysis.

    Gareth J. Morgan;Walter M. Gregory;Faith E. Davies;Sue E. Bell

  • A genome-wide association study identifies six susceptibility loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    Maria Chiara Di Bernardo;Dalemari Crowther-Swanepoel;Peter Broderick;Emily Webb

  • Low Testosterone Associated With Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome Contributes to Sexual Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Men With Type 2 Diabetes

    Christina Wang;Graham Jackson;T. Hugh Jones;Alvin M. Matsumoto

  • Identification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myeloma.

    Brian A. Walker;Konstantinos Mavrommatis;Christopher P. Wardell;T. Cody Ashby

  • A high-risk, Double-Hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis

    Brian A. Walker;Konstantinos Mavrommatis;Christopher P. Wardell;T. Cody Ashby

  • Diagnosis and management of acute graft-versus-host disease.

    Fiona L. Dignan;Andrew Clark;Persis Amrolia;Jacqueline Cornish

  • A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial.

    K D Boyd;F M Ross;L Chiecchio;G P Dagrada

  • Pregnancy outcomes after peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective survey

    N Salooja;RM Szydlo;G Socie;B Rio

  • Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

    Graham H Jackson;Faith E Davies;Charlotte Pawlyn;Charlotte Pawlyn;David A Cairns

  • APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma

    Brian A Walker;Christopher P Wardell;Alex Murison;Eileen M Boyle

  • Interferon-γ and interleukin-6 gene polymorphisms associate with graft-versus-host disease in HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplantation

    James Cavet;Anne M. Dickinson;Jean Norden;Penelope R. A. Taylor

  • In situ dissection of the graft-versus-host activities of cytotoxic T cells specific for minor histocompatibility antigens

    Anne M. Dickinson;Xiao Nong Wang;Lisbet Sviland;Florry A. Vyth-Dreese

Frequent Co-Authors

Gareth J. Morgan
Gareth J. Morgan Boston University
Faith E. Davies
Faith E. Davies New York University Langone Medical Center
Mark T. Drayson
Mark T. Drayson University of Birmingham
Walter M Gregory
Walter M Gregory University of Leeds
Brian A Walker
Brian A Walker Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Nigel H. Russell
Nigel H. Russell University of Nottingham
Anne M. Dickinson
Anne M. Dickinson Newcastle University
Richard S. Houlston
Richard S. Houlston Institute of Cancer Research
Matthew Collin
Matthew Collin Newcastle University
Ernst Holler
Ernst Holler University of Regensburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can expand your career options beyond traditional medical school. The demand for certified professionals in specialized healthcare roles continues to grow, and many reputable programs are now available online—making it easier and more affordable to start or advance your career.

For those interested in medical office roles, understanding the medical coding certification cost can help you plan your education investment efficiently. If advanced practice nursing is your goal, several affordable NP programs offer flexible online curricula that fit your schedule.

Nurses seeking to begin their career or upskill can find affordable nursing programs online tailored to a range of experience levels. For those aiming for leadership or research roles, exploring the cheapest DNP programs online can be a cost-effective way to earn a terminal degree.

With these flexible, accredited online pathways, you can tailor your educational journey to suit your goals and budget, making a rewarding healthcare career more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Graham Jackson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles