World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
27716
World Ranking
13645
National Ranking
449

Graham Jackson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Jackson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 578 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Graham Jackson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Jackson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Graham Jackson is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia in Australia. Their research has primarily focused on medical and molecular biology fields, contributing notably to hematology, oncology, and genetics.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, the scientist has contributed to several subfields, such as:

  • Hematology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Immunology

The primary research topics pursued involve:

  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research

Graham Jackson has published in several prominent venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Blood
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Blood Cancer Journal
  • British Journal of Haematology

Selected recent papers include:

  • Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma: A European Myeloma Network (EMN) Report Within the HARMONY Project, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Recommendations for vaccination in multiple myeloma: a consensus of the European Myeloma Network, 2020, Leukemia
  • International harmonization in performing and reporting minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma trials, 2020, Leukemia
  • Real-world assessment of the clinical impact of symptomatic infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (COVID-19 disease) in patients with multiple myeloma receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy, 2020, British Journal of Haematology
  • Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone as Induction and Extended Consolidation Improves Outcome in Ultra-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma, 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Among frequent co-authors they have collaborated extensively with are:

  • Gordon Cook
  • Martin Kaiser
  • David A. Cairns
  • Mark T. Drayson
  • Charlotte Pawlyn

Best Publications

  • Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men

    Francesco Montorsi;Ganesan Adaikan;Edgardo Becher;Francois Giuliano

  • Burkitt's lymphoma

    Elizabeth M Molyneux;Rosemary Rochford;Beverly Griffin;Robert Newton

  • First-line treatment with zoledronic acid as compared with clodronic acid in multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): a randomised controlled trial

    Gareth J Morgan;Faith E Davies;Walter M Gregory;Kim Cocks

  • Management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease: recommendations of the Princeton Consensus Panel.

    Robert DeBusk;Yaacov Drory;Irwin Goldstein;Graham Jackson

  • The Princeton III Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease

    Ajay Nehra;Graham Jackson;Martin Miner;Kevin L. Billups

  • Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma

    Brian A. Walker;Eileen M. Boyle;Christopher P. Wardell;Alex Murison

  • A Systematic Review of the Association Between Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease

    Giorgio Gandaglia;Alberto Briganti;Graham Jackson;Robert A. Kloner

  • Minimal Residual Disease Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma: Impact on Outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study

    Andy C. Rawstron;J. Anthony Child;Ruth M. de Tute;Faith E. Davies

  • The role of maintenance thalidomide therapy in multiple myeloma: MRC Myeloma IX results and meta-analysis.

    Gareth J. Morgan;Walter M. Gregory;Faith E. Davies;Sue E. Bell

  • A genome-wide association study identifies six susceptibility loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    Maria Chiara Di Bernardo;Dalemari Crowther-Swanepoel;Peter Broderick;Emily Webb

  • Low Testosterone Associated With Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome Contributes to Sexual Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Men With Type 2 Diabetes

    Christina Wang;Graham Jackson;T. Hugh Jones;Alvin M. Matsumoto

  • Identification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myeloma.

    Brian A. Walker;Konstantinos Mavrommatis;Christopher P. Wardell;T. Cody Ashby

  • A high-risk, Double-Hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis

    Brian A. Walker;Konstantinos Mavrommatis;Christopher P. Wardell;T. Cody Ashby

  • Diagnosis and management of acute graft-versus-host disease.

    Fiona L. Dignan;Andrew Clark;Persis Amrolia;Jacqueline Cornish

  • A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial.

    K D Boyd;F M Ross;L Chiecchio;G P Dagrada

  • Pregnancy outcomes after peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective survey

    N Salooja;RM Szydlo;G Socie;B Rio

  • Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

    Graham H Jackson;Faith E Davies;Charlotte Pawlyn;Charlotte Pawlyn;David A Cairns

  • APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma

    Brian A Walker;Christopher P Wardell;Alex Murison;Eileen M Boyle

  • Interferon-γ and interleukin-6 gene polymorphisms associate with graft-versus-host disease in HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplantation

    James Cavet;Anne M. Dickinson;Jean Norden;Penelope R. A. Taylor

  • In situ dissection of the graft-versus-host activities of cytotoxic T cells specific for minor histocompatibility antigens

    Anne M. Dickinson;Xiao Nong Wang;Lisbet Sviland;Florry A. Vyth-Dreese

Frequent Co-Authors

Gareth J. Morgan
Gareth J. Morgan Boston University
Faith E. Davies
Faith E. Davies New York University Langone Medical Center
Mark T. Drayson
Mark T. Drayson University of Birmingham
Walter M Gregory
Walter M Gregory University of Leeds
Brian A Walker
Brian A Walker Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Nigel H. Russell
Nigel H. Russell University of Nottingham
Anne M. Dickinson
Anne M. Dickinson Newcastle University
Richard S. Houlston
Richard S. Houlston Institute of Cancer Research
Matthew Collin
Matthew Collin Newcastle University
Ernst Holler
Ernst Holler University of Regensburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can expand your career options beyond traditional medical school. The demand for certified professionals in specialized healthcare roles continues to grow, and many reputable programs are now available online—making it easier and more affordable to start or advance your career.

For those interested in medical office roles, understanding the medical coding certification cost can help you plan your education investment efficiently. If advanced practice nursing is your goal, several affordable NP programs offer flexible online curricula that fit your schedule.

Nurses seeking to begin their career or upskill can find affordable nursing programs online tailored to a range of experience levels. For those aiming for leadership or research roles, exploring the cheapest DNP programs online can be a cost-effective way to earn a terminal degree.

With these flexible, accredited online pathways, you can tailor your educational journey to suit your goals and budget, making a rewarding healthcare career more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Graham Jackson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles