World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
95
Citations
35288
World Ranking
466
National Ranking
257

Jonathan Katz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Katz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 352 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jonathan Katz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Katz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Katz is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, predominantly in computer science and medicine, with a focus on various subfields and topics that reflect interdisciplinary expertise.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Medicine

The subfields in which Jonathan Katz has contributed are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Information Systems

The research topics of interest include:

  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs

Jonathan Katz has a significant number of publications, with notable recent papers including:

  • A Watermark for Large Language Models (2023), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Network-Agnostic State Machine Replication (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Honest-Majority Threshold ECDSA with Batch Generation of Key-Independent Presignatures (2025), published in IACR Communications in Cryptology
  • Exploring Burden Perceptions of Household Survey Respondents in the American Community Survey (2022), published in Journal of Official Statistics
  • RPPLNS: Pay-per-last-N-shares with a Randomised Twist (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

The most frequent co-authors collaborating with Jonathan Katz are:

  • Hemendra N. Shah
  • Robert Marcovich
  • Julian Loss
  • Archan Khandekar
  • Erica Blum

Jonathan Katz has published across several venues, with the most frequent being:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Urology
  • Cancer Research
  • BJUI Compass

In addition to articles, Jonathan Katz has authored books, including the title Cyber Security, Cryptology, and Machine Learning published in 2022 by Springer Science+Business Media.

Best Publications

  • A pairwise key predistribution scheme for wireless sensor networks

    Wenliang Du;Jing Deng;Yunghsiang S. Han;Pramod K. Varshney

  • Introduction to Modern Cryptography

    Jonathan Katz;Yehuda Lindell

  • Chosen-Ciphertext Security from Identity-Based Encryption

    Ran Canetti;Shai Halevi;Jonathan Katz

  • Predicate encryption supporting disjunctions, polynomial equations, and inner products

    Jonathan Katz;Amit Sahai;Brent Waters

  • Faster secure two-party computation using garbled circuits

    Yan Huang;David Evans;Jonathan Katz;Lior Malka

  • A forward-secure public-key encryption scheme

    Ran Canetti;Shai Halevi;Jonathan Katz

  • Introduction to Modern Cryptography (Chapman & Hall/CRC Cryptography and Network Security Series)

    Jonathan Katz;Yehuda Lindell

  • Efficient Password-Authenticated Key Exchange Using Human-Memorable Passwords

    Jonathan Katz;Rafail Ostrovsky;Moti Yung

  • Key-Insulated Public-Key Cryptosystems.

    Yevgeniy Dodis;Jonathan Katz;Shouhuai Xu;Moti Yung

  • Scalable Protocols for Authenticated Group Key Exchange

    Jonathan Katz;Moti Yung

  • Proofs of Storage from Homomorphic Identification Protocols

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Seny Kamara;Jonathan Katz

  • Toward secure key distribution in truly ad-hoc networks

    A. Khalili;J. Katz;W.A. Arbaugh

  • Signing a Linear Subspace: Signature Schemes for Network Coding

    Dan Boneh;David Freeman;Jonathan Katz;Brent Waters

  • Chosen-Ciphertext Security from Identity-Based Encryption

    Dan Boneh;Ran Canetti;Shai Halevi;Jonathan Katz

  • Introduction to Modern Cryptography, Second Edition

    Jonathan Katz;Yehuda Lindell

  • All Your Queries Are Belong to Us: The Power of File-Injection Attacks on Searchable Encryption.

    Yupeng Zhang;Jonathan Katz;Charalampos Papamanthou

  • Multi-input Functional Encryption

    Shafi Goldwasser;S. Dov Gordon;Vipul Goyal;Abhishek Jain

  • Efficiency improvements for signature schemes with tight security reductions

    Jonathan Katz;Nan Wang

  • Permacoin: Repurposing Bitcoin Work for Data Preservation

    Andrew Miller;Ari Juels;Elaine Shi;Bryan Parno

  • Private Set Intersection: Are Garbled Circuits Better than Custom Protocols?

    Yan Huang;David Evans;Jonathan Katz

  • Scalable Protocols for Authenticated Group Key Exchange

    Jonathan Katz;Moti Yung

  • A forward-secure public-key encryption scheme

    Ran Canetti;Shai Halevi;Jonathan Katz

  • AP airwise Key Predistribution Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks

    Wenliang Du;Jing Deng;Yunghsiang S. Han;Pramod K. Varshney

Frequent Co-Authors

Yehuda Lindell
Yehuda Lindell Bar-Ilan University
Elaine Shi
Elaine Shi Carnegie Mellon University
Yevgeniy Dodis
Yevgeniy Dodis New York University
Shai Halevi
Shai Halevi Amazon (United States)
Rafail Ostrovsky
Rafail Ostrovsky University of California, Los Angeles
Ran Canetti
Ran Canetti Boston University
Adam Smith
Adam Smith Boston University
Amy Hauck Newman
Amy Hauck Newman National Institutes of Health
Dan Boneh
Dan Boneh Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in computer science or related fields, there are diverse online degree options to explore. Completing an online program offers flexibility, allowing you to balance studies with work or other commitments. Options such as the accelerated cs degree can help you earn your qualification faster, opening career opportunities sooner.

If you’re considering interdisciplinary or alternative routes, studying environmental science can lead to roles in research, policy, or consulting. To learn more, visit what can you do with an environmental science major for insights into career paths.

Engineering is another rewarding avenue related to computer science. Degrees such as the environmental engineering bachelor's degree online or online mechanical engineering degrees offer practical knowledge with a technical edge. These programs are tailored for those seeking affordable, accredited education with strong job prospects.

By exploring these online degrees and allied career pathways, you can find a program and specialization that best suits your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Katz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles