World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
89
Citations
48971
World Ranking
632
National Ranking
337

Ran Canetti publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ran Canetti sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 282 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ran Canetti D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ran Canetti sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to cryptography and computer security

Overview

Ran Canetti is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a focus on cryptography and computer security. Their research spans various subfields, including artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, information systems, computer networks and communications, and law.

Their work covers several main topics, such as:

  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security

Ran Canetti has published in a variety of scholarly venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the ACM
  • Journal of Cryptology

Some notable papers by Ran Canetti include:

  • Universally Composable Security, 2020, Journal of the ACM
  • Reusable Fuzzy Extractors for Low-Entropy Distributions, 2020, Journal of Cryptology
  • Anonymous Collocation Discovery: Harnessing Privacy to Tame the Coronavirus, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Among frequent collaborators, Ran Canetti works regularly with Oxana Poburinnaya, Claudio Chamon, Eduardo R. Mucciolo, Andrei E. Ruckenstein, and Pratik Sarkar.

Ran Canetti has been recognized as an ACM Fellow in 2020 for contributions to cryptography and computer security.

Best Publications

  • Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols

    R. Canetti

  • HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication

    H. Krawczyk;M. Bellare;R. Canetti

  • Keying Hash Functions for Message Authentication

    Mihir Bellare;Ran Canetti;Hugo Krawczyk

  • The random oracle methodology, revisited

    Ran Canetti;Oded Goldreich;Shai Halevi

  • Analysis of Key-Exchange Protocols and Their Use for Building Secure Channels.

    Ran Canetti;Hugo Krawczyk

  • Security and Composition of Multiparty Cryptographic Protocols

    Ran Canetti

  • Universally composable notions of key exchange and secure channels

    Ran Canetti;Hugo Krawczyk

  • Efficient authentication and signing of multicast streams over lossy channels

    A. Perrig;R. Canetti;J.D. Tygar;Dawn Song

  • Chosen-Ciphertext Security from Identity-Based Encryption

    Ran Canetti;Shai Halevi;Jonathan Katz

  • The TESLA Broadcast Authentication Protocol

    Adrian Perrig;Ran Canetti;J. D. Tygar;Dawn Song

  • Multicast security: a taxonomy and some efficient constructions

    R. Canetti;J. Garay;G. Itkis;D. Micciancio

  • The random oracle methodology, revisited (preliminary version)

    Ran Canetti;Oded Goldreich;Shai Halevi

  • Efficient and Secure Source Authentication for Multicast.

    Adrian Perrig;Ran Canetti;Dawn Xiaodong Song;J. D. Tygar

  • Universally composable two-party and multi-party secure computation

    Ran Canetti;Yehuda Lindell;Rafail Ostrovsky;Amit Sahai

  • Universally Composable Commitments.

    Ran Canetti;Marc Fischlin

  • A forward-secure public-key encryption scheme

    Ran Canetti;Shai Halevi;Jonathan Katz

  • Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Proxy Re-Encryption.

    Ran Canetti;Susan Hohenberger

  • Adaptively secure multi-party computation

    Ran Canetti;Uri Feige;Oded Goldreich;Moni Naor

  • A Modular Approach to the Design and Analysis of Authentication and Key Exchange Protocols.

    Mihir Bellare;Ran Canetti;Hugo Krawczyk

  • A forward-secure public-key encryption scheme

    Ran Canetti;Shai Halevi;Jonathan Katz

  • Security and Composition of Multi-party Cryptographic Protocols.

    Ran Canetti

Frequent Co-Authors

Shai Halevi
Shai Halevi Amazon (United States)
Hugo Krawczyk
Hugo Krawczyk Amazon (United States)
Yehuda Lindell
Yehuda Lindell Bar-Ilan University
Shafi Goldwasser
Shafi Goldwasser University of California, Berkeley
Oded Goldreich
Oded Goldreich Weizmann Institute of Science
Jonathan Katz
Jonathan Katz University of Maryland, College Park
Alon Rosen
Alon Rosen Bocconi University
Rafael Pass
Rafael Pass Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology shapes today's workforce, online education offers flexible ways to advance your career. Many students interested in Computer Science also consider pursuing specialized online degrees closely linked to industry demand.

For those drawn to data analysis and AI, an online masters for data science can open doors to roles in tech, healthcare, and finance. If you’re interested in leadership and the built environment, an accelerated online construction management degree is ideal for moving up quickly in construction and engineering fields.

Business-minded students may look for an mba online cheap option, allowing you to gain essential management skills without a huge investment. Those eager for a faster pathway can also consider a 1 year masters degree to rapidly enhance credentials and job prospects.

Exploring online degree options can help you tailor your education to your career goals, combining convenience, affordability, and relevance to the evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Ran Canetti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles