World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
62
Citations
11070
World Ranking
3277
National Ranking
169

Gina M. Geffen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina M. Geffen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 223 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gina M. Geffen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina M. Geffen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gina M. Geffen is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and specializes in research within the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their work primarily focuses on pharmacology, cognitive neuroscience, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's research addresses topics including musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, pain management and the placebo effect, as well as empathy and medical education.

Gina M. Geffen has contributed to publications in the following venue:

  • Clinical Psychologist

Recent scholarly contributions include the paper titled Large-scale replication of psychological outcomes in a community-based interdisciplinary pain management program, published in 2021 in Clinical Psychologist.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Madeline L. Oehlerich
  • L. B. Geffen
  • Nathan Craig
  • Saul Geffen
  • Miriam Lovai

Best Publications

  • Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli.

    Gina Geffen;J. L. Bradshaw;G. Wallace

  • Selective attention: Perception or response?

    Anne Treisman;Gina Geffen

  • Performance measures of 16- to 86-year-old males and females on the auditory verbal learning test

    Gina Geffen;K. J. Moar;A. P. O'hanlon;C. R. Clark

  • Genetic influences on handedness: Data from 25,732 Australian and Dutch twin families

    Sarah E. Medland;Sarah E. Medland;David L. Duffy;Margaret J. Wright;Gina M. Geffen

  • Hemispheric asymmetry: verbal and spatial encoding of visual stimuli.

    Gina Geffen;John L. Bradshaw;Norman C. Nettleton

  • Catecholamines and the covert orientation of attention in humans

    C.R. Clark;G.M. Geffen;L.B. Geffen

  • The n-back as a dual-task: P300 morphology under divided attention

    Scott Watter;Gina M. Geffen;Laurie B. Geffen

  • ERP 'old/new' effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)

    Simon John Finnigan;Michael S Humphreys;Simon John Dennis;Gina Geffen

  • Genetic covariance among measures of information processing speed, working memory, and IQ

    M. Luciano;M. Luciano;M. J. Wright;G. A. Smith;G. M. Geffen

  • Covert orientation of visual attention in Parkinson's disease: an impairment in the maintenance of attention.

    M.J. Wright;R.J. Burns;G.M. Geffen;L.B. Geffen

  • Interhemispheric control of manual motor activity.

    Gina M. Geffen;Dean L. Jones;Laurence B. Geffen

  • Concussion in Contact Sports: Reliable Change Indices of Impairment and Recovery

    Anton D. Hinton-Bayre;Gina M. Geffen;Laurie B. Geffen;Ken A. McFarland

  • Genetics of cognition: outline of a collaborative twin study.

    Margie Wright;Eco De Geus;Juko Ando;Michelle Luciano;Michelle Luciano

  • Functional consequences of the transcallosal removal of intraventricular tumours

    M A Jeeves;D A Simpson;G Geffen

  • Mild head injury and speed of information processing: A prospective study of professional rugby league players

    Anton D. Hinton-bayre;Gina Geffen;Ken McFarland

  • Genetic variation of individual alpha frequency (IAF) and alpha power in a large adolescent twin sample.

    Christine M. Smit;Margaret J. Wright;Narelle K. Hansell;Gina M. Geffen

  • Selective attention and cerebral dominance in perceiving and responding to speech messages.

    Anne Treisman;Gina Geffen

  • Test-retest reliability of a new form of the auditory verbal learning test (AVLT)

    Gina M. Geffen;Peter Butterworth;Laurie B. Geffen

  • Catecholamines and attention. II: Pharmacological studies in normal humans.

    C.R. Clark;G.M. Geffen;L.B. Geffen

  • Athletes' age, sex, and years of education moderate the acute neuropsychological impact of sports-related concussion: a meta-analysis.

    Brooke K. Dougan;Mark S. Horswill;Gina M. Geffen

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret J. Wright
Margaret J. Wright University of Queensland
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Michelle Luciano
Michelle Luciano University of Edinburgh
Narelle K. Hansell
Narelle K. Hansell University of Queensland
Sarah E. Medland
Sarah E. Medland QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
David L. Duffy
David L. Duffy QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Mark S. Horswill
Mark S. Horswill University of Queensland
Annemaree Carroll
Annemaree Carroll University of Queensland
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland
George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse career journeys, especially in fields like counseling and therapy. For many prospective students, affordability and flexibility are major concerns. Fortunately, there are quality online options that allow you to study around your personal and professional commitments.

If you’re looking to minimize costs while maximizing your opportunities, start by exploring the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in New York and the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in Pennsylvania. These programs offer accredited online study at a fraction of the cost found elsewhere.

Major cities also provide affordable choices, such as several affordable online counseling master's programs in Philadelphia. If you’re considering options across the country, you’ll find plenty of nationally ranked choices among the most affordable online master's in counseling degree programs in America.

With these affordable online pathways, you can move forward in psychology or counseling and begin a rewarding career supporting mental health and wellbeing.

Best Scientists Citing Gina M. Geffen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles