World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
9779
World Ranking
6308
National Ranking
114

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
41
Citations
8885
World Ranking
6847
National Ranking
62

Gregory Peters publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory Peters sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Gregory Peters D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory Peters sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory Peters is affiliated with Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden and focuses on environmental science with an emphasis on sustainability and pollution. Their research explores various topics within the environmental impact of industrial processes and chemicals, contributing to a broad understanding of environmental sustainability and chemical toxicology.

The primary fields of study for Peters are Environmental Science, with subfields in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Environmental Engineering, and Pollution.

The main topics covered by Peters include:

  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Peters include:

  • The Need to Decelerate Fast Fashion in a Hot Climate - A Global Sustainability Perspective on the Garment Industry (2021, Journal of Cleaner Production)
  • The Environmental Price of Fast Fashion (2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment)
  • Review of Life-Cycle Based Methods for Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment and Their Applications (2020, Environmental Research Letters)
  • An Outdoor Aging Study to Investigate the Release of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) from Functional Textiles (2022, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • Environmental Impacts of Cotton and Opportunities for Improvement (2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment)

Peters frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

Co-authors regularly collaborating with Peters include:

  • Magdalena Svanström
  • Marta Behjat
  • Rickard Arvidsson
  • Hanna Holmquist
  • Hans Peter H. Arp

Best Publications

  • The environmental price of fast fashion

    Kirsi Niinimäki;Greg Peters;Helena Dahlbo;Patsy Perry

  • Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review

    Gustav A Sandin;Gregory Peters;Gregory Peters

  • Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Metropolitan Water Systems Planning

    Sven Lundie;Gregory M. Peters;Paul C. Beavis

  • Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment

    Anna Kounina;Anna Kounina;Manuele Margni;Manuele Margni;Jean-Baptiste Bayart;Anne-Marie Boulay

  • LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF FOOD WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS

    Sven Lundie;Gregory M. Peters

  • Life cycle assessment of clothing libraries: can collaborative consumption reduce the environmental impact of fast fashion?

    Bahareh Zamani;Gustav A Sandin;Gregory Peters;Gregory Peters

  • Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum.

    Hazel V. Rowley;Gregory M. Peters;Sven Lundie;Sven Lundie;Stephen J. Moore

  • Red meat production in australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies.

    Gregory M Peters;Hazel V Rowley;Stephen Wiedemann;Robyn Tucker

  • Review of life-cycle based methods for absolute environmental sustainability assessment and their applications

    Anders Bjorn;Anders Bjorn;Chanjief Chandrakumar;Anne-Marie Boulay;Gabor Doka

  • How city dwellers affect their resource hinterland a spatial impact study of Australian households

    Manfred Lenzen;Greg M. Peters

  • The need to decelerate fast fashion in a hot climate - A global sustainability perspective on the garment industry

    Gregory Peters;Mengyu Li;Manfred Lenzen

  • Properties, performance and associated hazards of state-of-the-art durable water repellent (DWR) chemistry for textile finishing

    H. Holmquist;Steffen Schellenberger;I. van der Veen;G. M. Peters

  • A Carbon Footprint of Textile Recycling: A Case Study in Sweden

    Bahareh Zamani;Magdalena Svanström;Gregory Peters;Tomas Rydberg

  • A life cycle assessment (LCA)-based approach to guiding an industry sector towards sustainability: the case of the Swedish apparel sector

    Sandra Roos;Bahareh Zamani;Gustav A. Sandin;Gregory Peters

  • Chemical contaminants in feedlot wastes: concentrations, effects and attenuation.

    S.J. Khan;D.J. Roser;C.M. Davies;G.M. Peters

  • Using the planetary boundaries framework for setting impact-reduction targets in LCA contexts

    Gustav A. Sandin;Gregory Peters;Magdalena Svanström

  • Environmental comparison of biosolids management systems using life cycle assessment.

    Gregory M. Peters;Hazel V. Rowley

  • Life cycle assessment of construction materials: the influence of assumptions in end-of-life modelling

    Gustav A. Sandin;Gustav A. Sandin;Gregory Peters;Magdalena Svanström

  • Accounting for water use in Australian red meat production

    Greg M. Peters;Stephen G. Wiedemann;Hazel V. Rowley;Robyn W. Tucker

  • Allocation in LCAs of biorefinery products: implications for results and decision-making

    Gustav A Sandin;Gustav A Sandin;Frida Røyne;Frida Røyne;Johanna Berlin;Gregory Peters

Frequent Co-Authors

Magdalena Svanström
Magdalena Svanström Chalmers University of Technology
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Nicholas J. Ashbolt Queensland University of Technology
Richard M. Stuetz
Richard M. Stuetz University of New South Wales
Ian T. Cousins
Ian T. Cousins Stockholm University
Stuart J. Khan
Stuart J. Khan University of Sydney
Hans Peter H. Arp
Hans Peter H. Arp Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Sander Bruun
Sander Bruun University of Copenhagen
Manuele Margni
Manuele Margni Polytechnique Montréal
William A. Maher
William A. Maher University of Canberra
Danny D. Reible
Danny D. Reible Texas Tech University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open new career pathways. Many professionals consider advanced education options like the education doctoral programs without dissertation, which offer flexible routes to deepen expertise without the traditional research commitment.

Transitioning from a master's to a doctoral level is also common. Programs such as the eds to edd program provide a streamlined path for educators looking to move into leadership positions or specialized research roles.

For those drawn to social work and community engagement within environmental contexts, affordable options like the cheapest online dsw programs offer opportunities to influence policy and support environmental justice initiatives.

Lastly, pursuing a broad foundation through one of the best affordable online general studies degree programs can provide versatile skills applicable across various environmental sectors, making them an excellent starting point for diverse career options.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles