World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5703 5298 333 325 296 9083

Ashleigh Lin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ashleigh Lin between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ashleigh Lin published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2021. 60 of the 337 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2021. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 28 publications
1992 2025

337 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ashleigh Lin: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 9
2011 12
2012 16
2013 13
2014 19
2015 17
2016 19
2017 19
2018 16
2019 11
2020 31
2021 37
2022 25
2023 21
2024 32
2025 28
Total 337
Download as CSV

Ashleigh Lin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashleigh Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 296 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113 296
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ashleigh Lin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashleigh Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ashleigh Lin is a researcher affiliated with the Telethon Kids Institute in Australia. Their work primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a significant focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, general health professions, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research covers various topics, including LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; schizophrenia research and treatment; child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development; sexuality, behavior, and technology; reproductive health and technologies; functional brain connectivity studies; and adolescent and pediatric healthcare.

Notable recent publications by Ashleigh Lin include:

  • Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Effectiveness, Acceptability, and Feasibility of Digital Health Interventions for LGBTIQ+ Young People: Systematic Review, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Mental health difficulties among trans and gender diverse young people with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD): Findings from Trans Pathways, 2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Misgendering and experiences of stigma in health care settings for transgender people, 2020, The Medical Journal of Australia
  • The psychological impact of paediatric burn injuries: a systematic review, 2021, BMC Public Health

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ashleigh Lin include:

  • Yael Perry (39 co-authored works)
  • Stephen J. Wood (34 co-authored works)
  • Penelope Strauss (30 co-authored works)
  • Alison R. Yung (27 co-authored works)
  • Patrick D. McGorry (25 co-authored works)

Ashleigh Lin's work has often appeared in the following publication venues:

  • International Journal of Transgender Health (11 publications)
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (10 publications)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (8 publications)
  • Schizophrenia Research (8 publications)
  • LGBTQ+ Family An Interdisciplinary Journal (7 publications)

Best Publications

  • Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk ("prodromal") for psychosis: the PACE 400 study

    Barnaby Nelson;Hok Pan Yuen;Stephen J Wood;Ashleigh Lin

  • The association between autism and schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A review of eight alternate models of co-occurrence

    Katharine Chisholm;Ashleigh Lin;Ahmad Abu-Akel;Stephen J. Wood

  • Cognitive deficits in youth with familial and clinical high risk to psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    E. Bora;A. Lin;Sj J. Wood;Sj J. Wood;Ar R. Yung;Ar R. Yung

  • Outcomes of Nontransitioned Cases in a Sample at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis

    Ashleigh Lin;Stephen J. Wood;Barnaby Nelson;Amanda Beavan

  • Central nervous system function in youth with type 1 diabetes 12 years after disease onset

    Elisabeth A. Northam;Debbie Rankins;Ashleigh Lin;R. Mark Wellard

  • Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis

    A. Lin;A. Lin;S.J. Wood;S.J. Wood;B. Nelson;W.J. Brewer

  • Risk perception and risk-taking behaviour during adolescence: the influence of personality and gender

    Renate L. E. P. Reniers;Laura Murphy;Ashleigh Lin;Sandra Para Bartolomé

  • Gender-affirming hormones and surgery in transgender children and adolescents.

    Simone Mahfouda;Julia K Moore;Aris Siafarikas;Aris Siafarikas;Timothy Hewitt

  • Neuropsychological profiles of young people with type 1 diabetes 12 yr after disease onset.

    Ashleigh Lin;Elisabeth A Northam;Elisabeth A Northam;Debbie Rankins;George A Werther

  • Sexual Trauma Increases the Risk of Developing Psychosis in an Ultra High-Risk “Prodromal” Population

    Andrew D Thompson;Andrew D Thompson;Barnaby Nelson;Hok Pan Yuen;Ashleigh Lin

  • Associations between negative life experiences and the mental health of trans and gender diverse young people in Australia: findings from Trans Pathways.

    Penelope Strauss;Angus Cook;Sam Winter;Vanessa Watson

  • Language skills of school-aged children prenatally exposed to antiepileptic drugs.

    C Nadebaum;VA Anderson;F Vajda;F Vajda;DC Reutens

  • Psychosocial well-being and functional outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes 12 years after disease onset

    Elisabeth A. Northam;Ashleigh Lin;Sue Finch;George A. Werther

  • Executive function outcomes following traumatic brain injury in young children: a five year follow-up.

    Caroline Nadebaum;Vicki Anderson;Cathy Catroppa

  • The Australian brain and cognition and antiepileptic drugs study: IQ in school-aged children exposed to sodium valproate and polytherapy.

    Caroline Nadebaum;Vicki Anderson;Frank Vajda;David Reutens

  • Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis.

    Maria Jalbrzikowski;Rebecca A. Hayes;Stephen J. Wood;Dorte Nordholm

  • Puberty suppression in transgender children and adolescents

    Simone Mahfouda;Julia K Moore;Aris Siafarikas;Florian D Zepf;Florian D Zepf

  • Prospective assessment of autism traits in children exposed to antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy.

    Amanda Gabrielle Wood;Caroline Elizabeth Nadebaum;Vicki Anne Anderson;David Charles Reutens

  • Declining transition rates to psychotic disorder in "ultra-high risk" clients: Investigation of a dilution effect

    Jessica A Hartmann;Hok Pan Yuen;Patrick D McGorry;Alison R Yung

  • Trans-Pathways: the mental health experiences and care pathways of trans young people - summary of results

    P. Strauss;A. Cook;Sam Winter;V. Watson

  • The relationship between coping and subclinical psychotic experiences in adolescents from the general population – a longitudinal study.

    Ashleigh Lin;J. T. W. Wigman;Barnaby Nelson;Wilma A. M. Vollebergh

  • Volumetric Abnormalities Predating the Onset of Schizophrenia and Affective Psychoses: An MRI Study in Subjects at Ultrahigh Risk of Psychosis

    Paola Dazzan;Bridget Soulsby;Andrea Mechelli;Stephen J Wood

  • Clinical staging in severe mental disorder: evidence from neurocognition and neuroimaging

    Ashleigh Lin;Renate L. E. P. Reniers;Stephen J. Wood

  • Childhood maltreatment and transition to psychotic disorder independently predict long-term functioning in young people at ultra-high risk for psychosis

    Alison Yung;Jack Cotter;Stephen Wood;Patrick McGorry

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen J. Wood
Stephen J. Wood University of Melbourne
Alison R. Yung
Alison R. Yung Deakin University
Barnaby Nelson
Barnaby Nelson University of Melbourne
Patrick D. McGorry
Patrick D. McGorry University of Melbourne
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis University of Melbourne
Dennis Velakoulis
Dennis Velakoulis University of Melbourne
Rosa Alati
Rosa Alati Curtin University
Sam Winter
Sam Winter Curtin University
Timothy W. Jones
Timothy W. Jones Tennessee Department of Health
Stefano Vicari
Stefano Vicari Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in studying psychology grows, many students are exploring flexible education options. Online psychology degrees offer the opportunity to balance coursework with work or family commitments. When considering an online program, cost-effectiveness is a major factor. For instance, several universities offer affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in Florida, making it easier for students to begin or advance their education without excessive debt.

Students in other states can also find excellent value programs. Georgia institutions provide some of the most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Georgia, while Minnesota schools are recognized for the most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Minnesota. New York colleges, too, offer affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in New York, helping learners across the country access affordable education.

Graduates of these programs open doors to a variety of rewarding pathways. Careers include counseling, human resources, social work, and research, or continuing to graduate school for specialized fields like clinical psychology. As online learning becomes more popular, it empowers students from all backgrounds to pursue meaningful careers in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Ashleigh Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles