World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Dieter Uhl publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Uhl sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Dieter Uhl D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Uhl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter Uhl is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research primarily spans across Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Within these disciplines, their work has focused on several subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Molecular Biology, and Mechanics of Materials.

The main topics of Dieter Uhl's research cover a range of areas related to paleobotany, geology, and paleoclimatology. These include:

  • Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Fern and Epiphyte Biology

Their frequent co-authors reflect collaborative efforts in these fields and include André Jasper, Haytham El Atfy, Yongdong Wang, Rafael Spiekermann, and Aowei Xie.

Publications by Dieter Uhl have appeared in a variety of scientific venues, notably:

  • Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
  • Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
  • Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
  • Cretaceous Research
  • Palaeoworld

Examples of recent papers include:

  • Evidence for the repeated occurrence of wildfires in an upper Pliocene lignite deposit from Yunnan, SW China, 2022, International Journal of Coal Geology
  • Evidence of widespread wildfires in coal seams from the Middle Jurassic of Northwest China and its impact on paleoclimate, 2020, Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
  • Palaeobotanical experiences of plant diversity in deep time. 1: How well can we identify past plant diversity in the fossil record?, 2021, Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
  • Paleoclimate-induced wildfires in a paleomire in the Ordos Basin, Northern China during the Middle Jurassic greenhouse period, 2023, Chemical Geology
  • Palaeobotanical experiences of plant diversity in deep time. 2: How to measure and analyse past plant biodiversity, 2021, Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology

Best Publications

  • The role of the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau for the evolution of Tibetan biotas

    Adrien Favre;Martin Päckert;Steffen U. Pauls;Sonja C. Jähnig

  • Miocene climate in Europe — Patterns and evolution

    Angela A. Bruch;Dieter Uhl;Volker Mosbrugger

  • A Late Miocene climate model simulation with ECHAM4/ML and its quantitative validation with terrestrial proxy data

    Arne Micheels;Angela A. Bruch;Dieter Uhl;Dieter Uhl;Torsten Utescher

  • The burning of Gondwana: Permian fires on the southern continent—A palaeobotanical approach

    André Jasper;Margot Guerra-Sommer;Abdalla M.B. Abu Hamad;Marion Bamford

  • Late Moscovian terrestrial biotas and palaeoenvironments of Variscan Euramerica

    C.J. Cleal;S. Opluštil;B.A. Thomas;Y. Tenchov

  • Reconstructing palaeotemperatures using leaf floras – case studies for a comparison of leaf margin analysis and the coexistence approach

    D Uhl;V Mosbrugger;A Bruch;T Utescher

  • Cenozoic paleotemperatures and leaf physiognomy — A European perspective

    Dieter Uhl;Dieter Uhl;Stefan Klotz;Christopher Traiser;Christine Thiel

  • Plant biodiversity changes in Carboniferous tropical wetlands

    C. J. Cleal;D. Uhl;B. Cascales-Miñana;B. A. Thomas

  • Triassic and Jurassic palaeoclimate development in the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, Northwest China—a review and additional lithological data

    A. Rahman Ashraf;Yuewu Sun;Ge Sun;Ge Sun;Dieter Uhl

  • Wildfires in the Late Palaeozoic of Central Europe - The Zechstein (Upper Permian) of NW-Hesse (Germany)

    Dieter Uhl;Hans Kerp

  • The record of Triassic charcoal and other evidence for palaeo-wildfires: Signal for atmospheric oxygen levels, taphonomic biases or lack of fuel?

    Abdallah M.B. Abu Hamad;André Jasper;Dieter Uhl

  • Wildfires in the Late Palaeozoic of Central Europe—an overview of the Rotliegend (Upper Carboniferous-Lower Permian) of the Saar-Nahe Basin (SW-Germany)

    D. Uhl;S. Lausberg;R. Noll;K.R.G. Stapf

  • Na Duong (northern Vietnam) – an exceptional window into Eocene ecosystems from Southeast Asia

    Madelaine Böhme;Manuela Aiglstorfer;Pierre-Olivier Antoine;Erwin Appel

  • Evidence for palaeo-wildfire in the Late Permian palaeotropics – charcoalified wood from the Um Irna Formation of Jordan

    D. Uhl;A. Abu Hamad;A. Abu Hamad;H. Kerp;K. Bandel

  • Seasonality intensification and long-term winter cooling as a part of the Late Pliocene climate development

    Stefan Klotz;Stefan Klotz;Séverine Fauquette;Nathalie Combourieu-Nebout;Dieter Uhl;Dieter Uhl

  • The sensitivity of ECHAM4/ML to a double CO2 scenario for the Late Miocene and the comparison to terrestrial proxy data

    Anke Steppuhn;Arne Micheels;Arne Micheels;Angela A. Bruch;Dieter Uhl;Dieter Uhl

  • Refining CLAMP — Investigations towards improving the Climate Leaf Analysis Multivariate Program

    Vasilis Teodoridis;Petr Mazouch;Robert A. Spicer;Robert A. Spicer;Dieter Uhl

  • Palaeoclimate estimates for the Middle Miocene Schrotzburg flora (S Germany): a multi-method approach

    Dieter Uhl;Dieter Uhl;Angela A. Bruch;Angela A. Bruch;Christopher Traiser;Stefan Klotz

  • The antiquity of the Rhine River: stratigraphic coverage of the dinotheriensande (eppelsheim formation) of the Mainz Basin (Germany).

    Madelaine Böhme;Manuela Aiglstorfer;Dieter Uhl;Ottmar Kullmer

  • Fires in the mire: repeated fire events in Early Permian ‘peat forming’ vegetation of India

    André Jasper;Deepa Agnihotri;Rajni Tewari;Rafael Spiekermann

  • Source rock potential and paleoenvironment of the Miocene Rudeis and Kareem formations, Gulf of Suez, Egypt: An integrated palynofacies and organic geochemical approach

    Haytham El Atfy;Haytham El Atfy;Rainer Brocke;Dieter Uhl;Dieter Uhl;Bandar Ghassal

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Klotz
Stefan Klotz Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Volker Mosbrugger
Volker Mosbrugger American Museum of Natural History
Torsten Utescher
Torsten Utescher University of Bonn
Volker Mosbrugger
Volker Mosbrugger American Museum of Natural History
Leszek Marynowski
Leszek Marynowski University of Silesia
Christopher J. Cleal
Christopher J. Cleal University of Bristol
Madelaine Böhme
Madelaine Böhme University of Tübingen
Ralf Littke
Ralf Littke RWTH Aachen University
Michael Krings
Michael Krings Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jennifer C. McElwain
Jennifer C. McElwain Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to a range of interdisciplinary career options. For those interested in expanding their management skills, pursuing the best online human resource management masters degree can provide valuable expertise in leading teams and managing organizational resources.

Online education has become increasingly accessible, especially for mature learners. Many institutions now offer tailored options, such as online degree programs for seniors, helping older students pursue their academic and career goals alongside younger peers.

Additionally, careers connected to research and information management often benefit from a solid foundation in library science. Specialized options include ala accredited library science programs online, which ensure professional standards in cataloging and data organization.

Those looking to focus on information sciences more broadly might consider a library degree, equipping students with skills crucial for managing digital and physical knowledge resources in academic or public settings.

Best Scientists Citing Dieter Uhl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles