World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
12277
World Ranking
5894
National Ranking
2585

Mark B. Moss publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Moss sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark B. Moss D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Moss sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Pathology
  • Neuroscience

Mark B. Moss mainly focuses on Audiology, Neuroscience, White matter, Cognitive decline and Pathology. Mark B. Moss has researched Audiology in several fields, including Memory problems, Psychiatry, Developmental psychology, Normal control and Disease. The Developmental psychology study combines topics in areas such as Cognition and Cognitive disorder.

His research in Hippocampal formation, Hippocampus, Neocortex and Cerebral cortex are components of Neuroscience. Mark B. Moss has included themes like Nitric oxide synthase, Nitric oxide, Corpus callosum and Microglia in his White matter study. Mark B. Moss combines subjects such as Analysis of variance, Neuroglia, Senescence, Magnetic resonance imaging and Ageing with his study of Pathology.

His most cited work include:

  • Use of structural magnetic resonance imaging to predict who will get Alzheimer's disease. (568 citations)
  • MRI measures of entorhinal cortex vs hippocampus in preclinical AD. (474 citations)
  • Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests. (447 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Neuroscience, Cognition, Cognitive decline, Audiology and Prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience connects with themes related to White matter in his study. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Developmental psychology, Senescence and Primate.

His biological study deals with issues like Cognitive disorder, which deal with fields such as Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance and Neuropsychology. His work carried out in the field of Audiology brings together such families of science as Young adult, Normal control, Psychiatry and Memory problems. His Prefrontal cortex research includes themes of Cognitive psychology and Cognitive flexibility.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Neuroscience (48.67%)
  • Cognition (38.05%)
  • Cognitive decline (30.09%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2006-2019)?

  • Neuroscience (48.67%)
  • Prefrontal cortex (25.66%)
  • White matter (25.66%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Mark B. Moss mainly focuses on Neuroscience, Prefrontal cortex, White matter, Cognition and Cognitive decline. His Neuroscience research is mostly focused on the topic Frontal lobe. His White matter research incorporates elements of Forebrain, Diffusion MRI, Prospective cohort study and Anatomy.

The concepts of his Cognition study are interwoven with issues in Alzheimer's disease and Dementia. The various areas that Mark B. Moss examines in his Dementia study include Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance, Audiology, Neuropsychology and Clinical psychology. His Cognitive decline research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Hazard ratio, Proportional hazards model, Trail Making Test and Primate.

Between 2006 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Neuropsychological Measures in Normal Individuals That Predict Subsequent Cognitive Decline (222 citations)
  • Longitudinal change in cognitive performance among individuals with mild cognitive impairment. (130 citations)
  • Frontal connections and cognitive changes in normal aging rhesus monkeys: a DTI study. (95 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Pathology
  • Neuroscience

His primary areas of investigation include White matter, Forebrain, Frontal lobe, Neuroscience and Cerebral cortex. His White matter research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Bioinformatics, Cognitive test, Disease, Pathology and Cerebral amyloid angiopathy. His Frontal lobe research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Association fiber, Fractional anisotropy, Diffusion MRI, Superior longitudinal fasciculus and Corpus callosum.

Neuroscience is closely attributed to Cognitive psychology in his research. His Cerebral cortex study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Brain mapping, Caudate nucleus, Anatomy, Magnetic resonance imaging and Atrophy.

Best Publications

  • Use of structural magnetic resonance imaging to predict who will get Alzheimer's disease.

    Ronald J. Killiany;Teresa Gomez-Isla;Mark Moss;Ron Kikinis

  • MRI measures of entorhinal cortex vs hippocampus in preclinical AD.

    R. J. Killiany;B. T. Hyman;T. Gomez-Isla;M. B. Moss

  • Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests.

    Marilyn S. Albert;Mark B. Moss;Rudolph Tanzi;Kenneth Jones

  • White matter changes with normal aging

    C.R.G. Guttmann;F. A. Jolesz;R. Kikinis;R. J. Killiany

  • Differential Patterns of Memory Loss Among Patients With Alzheimer's Disease, Huntington's Disease, and Alcoholic Korsakoff's Syndrome

    Mark B. Moss;Marilyn S. Albert;Nelson Butters;Nelson Butters;Melanie Payne

  • Temporal Lobe Regions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identify Patients With Early Alzheimer's Disease

    Ronald J. Killiany;Mark B. Moss;Marilyn S. Albert;Tamas Sandor

  • Additional Factors Influencing Sensitivity in the Tetramethyl Benzidine Method for Horseradish Peroxidase Neurohistochemistry

    M M Mesulam;E Hegarty;H Barbas;K A Carson

  • Neurobiological Bases of Age-Related Cognitive Decline in the Rhesus Monkey

    A Peters;A Peters;D L Rosene;D L Rosene;M B Moss;M B Moss;T L Kemper

  • β-Secretase Activity Increases with Aging in Human, Monkey, and Mouse Brain

    Hiroaki Fukumoto;Douglas L. Rosene;Douglas L. Rosene;Mark B. Moss;Mark B. Moss;Susan Raju

  • Patterns of cognitive decline in aged rhesus monkeys.

    James G Herndon;Mark B Moss;Mark B Moss;Douglas L Rosene;Douglas L Rosene;Ronald J Killiany

  • Differentiation of amnesic and demented patients with the wechsler memory scale -revised

    Nelson Butters;David P. Salmon;C. Munro Cullum;Patricia Cairns

  • Hippocampal resections impair associative learning and recognition memory in the monkey

    H Mahut;S Zola-Morgan;M Moss

  • Neuropsychological Measures in Normal Individuals That Predict Subsequent Cognitive Decline

    Deborah Blacker;Hang Lee;Alona Muzikansky;Emily C. Martin;Emily C. Martin

  • Increased microglial activation and protein nitration in white matter of the aging monkey.

    Jacob A. Sloane;William Hollander;Mark B. Moss;Mark B. Moss;Douglas L. Rosene;Douglas L. Rosene

  • Concurrent discrimination learning of monkeys after hippocampal, entorhinal, or fornix lesions.

    M Moss;H Mahut;S Zola-Morgan

  • Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey.

    Lori L. Beason-Held;Douglas L. Rosene;Ronald J. Killiany;Mark B. Moss

  • The Effects of Aging on Area 46 of the Frontal Cortex of the Rhesus Monkey

    Alan Peters;Diana Leahu;Mark B. Moss;Karen J. McNally

  • Effects of aging on myelinated nerve fibers in monkey primary visual cortex.

    Alan Peters;Alan Peters;Mark B. Moss;Mark B. Moss;Claire Sethares

  • The effects of aging on layer 1 in area 46 of prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey.

    Alan Peters;Claire Sethares;Mark B. Moss

  • Longitudinal change in cognitive performance among individuals with mild cognitive impairment.

    Marilyn Albert;Deborah Blacker;Mark B Moss;Rudolph Tanzi

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas L. Rosene
Douglas L. Rosene Boston University
Ronald J. Killiany
Ronald J. Killiany Boston University
Marilyn S. Albert
Marilyn S. Albert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
James G. Herndon
James G. Herndon Emory University
Alan Peters
Alan Peters Boston University
Ferenc A. Jolesz
Ferenc A. Jolesz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Carmela R. Abraham
Carmela R. Abraham Boston University
Rudolph E. Tanzi
Rudolph E. Tanzi Harvard University
Bradley T. Hyman
Bradley T. Hyman Harvard University
Antoni Valero-Cabré
Antoni Valero-Cabré Sorbonne University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark B. Moss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles