World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
82
Citations
26737
World Ranking
1325
National Ranking
797

John J. McArdle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. McArdle sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 233 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John J. McArdle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. McArdle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

John J. McArdle is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

Their work covers several subfields, including Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Business and International Management, and Biomedical Engineering.

Core topics addressed in their research focus on Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, Global trade and economics, Innovation and Socioeconomic Development, Biomedical and Engineering Education, Social Sciences and Governance, Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth, and ICT Impact and Policies.

Recent publications by John J. McArdle include:

  • Street Challenge Pedagogy: How Walking Down Main Street Broadens Entrepreneurship and Ecosystem Perspectives, 2021, Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy
  • Barriers to scale: the effect of regulations on entrepreneurial strategies in a nascent industry, 2024, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy
  • Other People's Money: CSR Goes to the Movies, 2020, Management Teaching Review

Other related papers coauthored with frequent collaborators are also noted, including works published in Central European Business Review and Journal of Canadian Studies.

Frequent co-authors in McArdle's research include:

  • Alice J. de Koning
  • Esat Durguti
  • Alice de Koning
  • Arlinda Sherifi
  • Muhamet J. Spahiu

Common publication venues for their research are:

  • Central European Business Review
  • Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy
  • Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy
  • Journal of Canadian Studies
  • Management Teaching Review

In recognition of scholarly contributions, John J. McArdle was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Latent Variable Modeling of Differences and Changes with Longitudinal Data

    John J McArdle

  • A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research

    John L. Horn;J. J. Mcardle

  • Latent Growth Curves within Developmental Structural Equation Models.

    J. J. McArdle;David Epstein

  • Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States.

    Brenda L. Plassman;Kenneth M. Langa;Gwenith G. Fisher;Steven G. Heeringa

  • Dynamic but Structural Equation Modeling of Repeated Measures Data

    J. J. McArdle

  • Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span.

    John J. McArdle;Emilio Ferrer-Caja;Fumiaki Hamagami;Richard W. Woodcock

  • Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data.

    John J. McArdle;Fumiaki Hamagami

  • Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model for moment structures.

    J. Jack McArdle;Roderick P. McDonald

  • Growth Curve Analysis in Contemporary Psychological Research

    John J. McArdle;John R. Nesselroade

  • Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models.

    McArdle Jj

  • Age changes in processing speed as a leading indicator of cognitive aging.

    Deborah Finkel;Chandra A. Reynolds;John J. McArdle;Nancy L. Pedersen

  • Investigating Ceiling Effects in Longitudinal Data Analysis

    Lijuan Wang;Zhiyong Zhang;John J. McArdle;Timothy A. Salthouse

  • Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural models.

    J. J. McArdle;Fumiaki Hamagami

  • Longitudinal Modeling of Developmental Changes in Psychological Research

    Emilio Ferrer;John J. McArdle

  • Alternative structural models for multivariate longitudinal data analysis.

    Emilio Ferrer;John J. McArdle

  • Neuropsychological Measures in Normal Individuals That Predict Subsequent Cognitive Decline

    Deborah Blacker;Hang Lee;Alona Muzikansky;Emily C. Martin;Emily C. Martin

  • Psychological foundations of financial planning for retirement.

    Douglas A. Hershey;Joy M. Jacobs-Lawson;John J. McArdle;Fumiaki Hamagami

  • Latent variable analyses of age trends of cognition in the Health and Retirement Study, 1992-2004.

    John J. McArdle;Gwenith G. Fisher;Kelly M. Kadlec

  • Using multivariate data to structure developmental change.

    J. J. McArdle;John R. Nesselroade

  • Structural Factor Analysis Experiments with Incomplete Data

    John J. McArdle

  • Contemporary psychometrics : a festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald

    Albert Maydeu-Olivares;John J. McArdle

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Nesselroade
John R. Nesselroade University of Virginia
Kevin J. Grimm
Kevin J. Grimm Arizona State University
Carol A. Prescott
Carol A. Prescott University of Southern California
James P. Smith
James P. Smith Princeton University
Nancy L. Pedersen
Nancy L. Pedersen Karolinska Institute
Deborah Finkel
Deborah Finkel Indiana University
Chandra A. Reynolds
Chandra A. Reynolds University of California, Riverside
Robert J. Willis
Robert J. Willis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Emilio Ferrer
Emilio Ferrer University of California, Davis
Ronald C. Johnson
Ronald C. Johnson University of Hawaii at Manoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up diverse career opportunities, especially when combined with fields like social work. Many students interested in mental health, counseling, or community outreach consider online degrees for greater flexibility and affordability.

Choosing the right program depends on your budget and career goals. For those in Kentucky, the cheapest online social work programs in Kentucky can make advanced study accessible without high tuition costs. Similarly, residents of Massachusetts may explore the most affordable online social work degree programs in Massachusetts for quality education at a lower price point.

If you’re considering a graduate degree, the affordable online social work master's degrees in the South offer variety and convenience for learners across southern states. Prospective students in Texas can also benefit from researching affordable online social work master's degrees in Texas.

Each pathway equips graduates for roles such as social workers, counselors, or mental health advocates. When selecting a program, consider both reputation and financial fit to launch a rewarding career in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing John J. McArdle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles