World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
23656
World Ranking
15678
National Ranking
7887

John M. Hallenbeck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Hallenbeck sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 240 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John M. Hallenbeck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Hallenbeck sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Hallenbeck is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Specific subfields of study include molecular biology and physiology.

Their work addresses topics such as metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, adipose tissue and metabolism, and mitochondrial function and pathology.

Recent publications include a 2023 article titled Integrative transcriptomic and metabolic analyses of the mammalian hibernating brain identifies a key role for succinate dehydrogenase in ischemic tolerance, published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

  • Joshua D. Bernstock
  • Cory M. Willis
  • Monica Emili Garcia-Segura
  • Edoardo Gaude
  • Daniela Anni

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Ischemic tolerance and endogenous neuroprotection

    Ulrich Dirnagl;Roger P. Simon;John M. Hallenbeck

  • Polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes/macrophages in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia and stroke.

    P M Kochanek;J M Hallenbeck

  • Inflammation and stroke: putative role for cytokines, adhesion molecules and iNOS in brain response to ischemia.

    Gregory del Zoppo;Irene Ginis;John M. Hallenbeck;Constantino Iadecola

  • Polymorphonuclear leukocyte accumulation in brain regions with low blood flow during the early postischemic period.

    J M Hallenbeck;A J Dutka;T Tanishima;P M Kochanek

  • Peak plasma interleukin-6 and other peripheral markers of inflammation in the first week of ischaemic stroke correlate with brain infarct volume, stroke severity and long-term outcome

    Craig J. Smith;Craig J. Smith;Hedley C. A. Emsley;Hedley C. A. Emsley;Carole M. Gavin;Rachel F. Georgiou

  • Dual role of tumor necrosis factor alpha in brain injury

    Esther Shohami;Irene Ginis;John M Hallenbeck

  • The many faces of tumor necrosis factor in stroke.

    John M. Hallenbeck

  • TNF-α Pretreatment Induces Protective Effects Against Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Mice

    Hiroshi Nawashiro;Kaoru Tasaki;Christl A. Ruetzler;John M. Hallenbeck

  • Background Review and Current Concepts of Reperfusion Injury

    John M. Hallenbeck;Andrew J. Dutka

  • Interleukin-1 beta mRNA expression in ischemic rat cortex.

    T Liu;P C McDonnell;P R Young;R F White

  • Advances in the vascular pathophysiology of ischemic stroke.

    Gregory J del Zoppo;John M Hallenbeck

  • Lipopolysaccharide pre-treatment induces resistance against subsequent focal cerebral ischemic damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

    Kaoru Tasaki;Christl A Ruetzler;Toshiho Ohtsuki;David Martin

  • Progression in Acute Stroke Value of the Initial NIH Stroke Scale Score on Patient Stratification in Future Trials

    Thomas J. DeGraba;John M. Hallenbeck;Karen D. Pettigrew;Andrew J. Dutka

  • An early and sustained peripheral inflammatory response in acute ischaemic stroke: relationships with infection and atherosclerosis

    Hedley C.A. Emsley;Hedley C.A. Emsley;Craig J. Smith;Craig J. Smith;Carole M. Gavin;Rachel F. Georgiou;Rachel F. Georgiou

  • The Harms and Benefits of Inflammatory and Immune Responses in Vascular Disease

    Ángel Chamorro;John Hallenbeck

  • Suppression of protein synthesis in brain during hibernation involves inhibition of protein initiation and elongation.

    Kai U. Frerichs;Carolyn B. Smith;Michael Brenner;Donald J. DeGracia

  • Immunologic Privilege in the Central Nervous System and the Blood–Brain Barrier

    Leslie L Muldoon;Jorge I Alvarez;David J Begley;Ruben J Boado

  • Overexpression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in the brain exacerbates ischemic brain injury and is associated with recruitment of inflammatory cells.

    Yong Chen;John M Hallenbeck;Christl Ruetzler;David Bol

  • Growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein GADD34 assembles a novel signaling complex containing protein phosphatase 1 and inhibitor 1.

    John H. Connor;Douglas C. Weiser;Shi Li;John M. Hallenbeck

  • Local cerebral blood flow during hibernation, a model of natural tolerance to "cerebral ischemia".

    Kai U. Frerichs;Charles Kennedy;Louis Sokoloff;John M. Hallenbeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Dragan Maric
Dragan Maric National Institutes of Health
Patrick M. Kochanek
Patrick M. Kochanek University of Pittsburgh
Stefano Pluchino
Stefano Pluchino University of Cambridge
Giora Z. Feuerstein
Giora Z. Feuerstein Debina Diagnostics
Deborah A. Dawson
Deborah A. Dawson National Institutes of Health
Michael Brenner
Michael Brenner University of Alabama at Birmingham
Steven Warach
Steven Warach The University of Texas at Austin
Esther Shohami
Esther Shohami Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Louis Sokoloff
Louis Sokoloff National Institutes of Health
Stefanie N. Vogel
Stefanie N. Vogel University of Maryland, Baltimore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring medical careers beyond a traditional MD program, there are several flexible online degree options and alternative pathways in healthcare. For aspiring nurses, direct admit nursing programs can offer a streamlined path directly into nursing coursework without lengthy pre-requisites, making them ideal for students eager to start clinical training.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, accredited healthcare administration degree programs are available online—often in accelerated formats—preparing graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies.

If you're looking for programs that emphasize accessibility, consider absn programs that don't require teas, which allow career-changers and non-traditional students to pursue a nursing degree without standardized admission exams.

Additionally, for those seeking in-demand technical roles, there are various medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, helping students train affordably for essential positions in medical records and health information management.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Hallenbeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles