World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
13597
World Ranking
8045
National Ranking
17

David Chan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Chan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Chan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Chan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Chan is affiliated with Singapore Management University in Singapore and conducts research primarily within the Social Sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including Law, Social Psychology, Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The scientist's research topics focus on Legal principles and applications, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Health disparities and outcomes, Aging and Gerontology Research, Spinal Cord Injury Research, and Elder Abuse and Neglect.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by David Chan include:

  • Understanding the physical health associations of intra-individual variability in life satisfaction among older adults, 2025, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
  • John Schwenkler, Anscombe's Intention: A Guide. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. ISBN978-0-19-005203-4, $24.95, Pbk, 2021, The Journal of Value Inquiry
  • Correction to: John Schwenkler, Anscombe's Intention: A Guide. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. ISBN978-0-19-005203-4, $24.95, Pbk, 2021, The Journal of Value Inquiry
  • Vision Care as A Strategy to Prevent Falls Among People with Moderate or Severe Intellectual Disability in the Hostel Setting in Hong Kong, 2024, Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David Chan include:

  • Frosch Y. X. Quek
  • Kenneth Tan
  • Phil Wai Shun Leung
  • Alexander K. C. Leung
  • Carmen Sze Oi Tsang

The venues where David Chan often publishes include:

  • The Journal of Value Inquiry
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management

David Chan has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by World Scientific:

  • Meaning Matters, 2021

Best Publications

  • Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models

    David Chan

  • So Why Ask Me? Are Self-Report Data Really That Bad?

    David Chan

  • Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions.

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt

  • The Conceptualization and Analysis of Change Over Time: An Integrative Approach Incorporating Longitudinal Mean and Covariance Structures Analysis (LMACS) and Multiple Indicator Latent Growth Modeling (MLGM)

    David Chan

  • Personnel Selection: A Theoretical Approach

    Neal W Schmitt;David Chan

  • Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: a latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation.

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt

  • Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes.

    David Chan

  • Reactions to cognitive ability tests: the relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation.

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt;Richard P. DeShon;Cathy S. Clause

  • Situational Judgment and Job Performance

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt

  • What Is Method Variance and How Can We Cope With It? A Panel Discussion

    Michael T. Brannick;David Chan;James M. Conway;Charles E. Lance

  • Cognitive Misfit of Problem-Solving Style at Work: A Facet of Person-Organization Fit

    David Chan;David Chan

  • Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinations

    Neal Schmitt;William Rogers;David Chan;Lori Sheppard

  • Multilevel Methods: Future Directions in Measurement, Longitudinal Analyses, and Nonnormal Outcomes

    Paul D. Bliese;David Chan;Robert E. Ployhart

  • Understanding Adaptation to Changes in the Work Environment: Integrating Individual Difference and Learning Perspectives

    David Chan

  • Understanding pretest and posttest reactions to cognitive ability and personality tests

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt;Joshua M. Sacco;Richard P. DeShon

  • Justice in Organizations: Theory, Methods, and Applications

    Stephen W. Gilliland;David Chan

  • EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE SURVEYS IN A MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION: CONSIDERING LANGUAGE AND CULTURE IN ASSESSING MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE

    Ann Marie Ryan;David Chan;Robert E. Ployhart;L. Allen Slade

  • An Agenda for Future Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: A Construct‐Oriented Approach

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt

  • Detection of Differential Item Functioning on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory Using Multiple-Group Mean and Covariance Structure Analyses.

    David Chan

  • Longitudinal Research: A Panel Discussion on Conceptual Issues, Research Design, and Statistical Techniques

    Mo Wang;Daniel J. Beal;David Chan;Daniel A. Newman

  • Verbal overshadowing effects on Raven's advanced progressive matrices: Evidence for multidimensional performance determinants

    Richard P. DeShon;David Chan;Daniel A. Weissbein

Frequent Co-Authors

Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University
Richard P. DeShon
Richard P. DeShon Michigan State University
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Robert E. Ployhart
Robert E. Ployhart University of South Carolina
Angela K.-Y. Leung
Angela K.-Y. Leung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Jeffrey B. Vancouver
Jeffrey B. Vancouver Ohio University
Ed Diener
Ed Diener University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Robert J. Vandenberg
Robert J. Vandenberg University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of careers in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Many students now explore online degree options, which offer flexibility and access to accredited programs nationwide. These online pathways can help you meet state-specific requirements for various roles, such as becoming a licensed therapist or counselor.

If you’re interested in licensure, it’s important to understand the unique educational and practical experience criteria based on location. For details on how to become a licensed therapist in Gilbert or to learn more about Glendale licensed therapist education requirements, reviewing local guidelines is crucial. Similarly, read about how to become a licensed therapist in Greensboro or the process of becoming a licensed therapist in Henderson to understand region-specific pathways.

Exploring these diverse educational and career options can help you choose the best route toward licensure and a rewarding profession in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing David Chan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles